Advertisement

A randomized trial of povidone-iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contamination

      Abstract

      Background: Contamination of blood cultures creates problems in their interpretation and unneeded resource utilization. Because skin flora comprise the major group of contaminant species, more effective skin disinfection at the venipuncture site could reduce contamination.
      Subjects and methods: We performed a randomized trial in adult inpatients at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Antecubital venipuncture sites were randomly disinfected with povidone-iodine or iodine tincture, and blood cultures (two bottles, 10 mL of blood) were drawn by professional phlebotomists. Scoring of contaminant species was restricted to skin flora. Hospital resource utilization was compared among patients with contaminated blood cultures and those with sterile blood cultures.
      Results: Of the 3,851 blood cultures collected during the study, 120 (3.1%) were contaminated with skin flora. The contamination rate for blood cultures collected after povidone-iodine was 3.8% (74 of 1,947), compared with a rate of 2.4% (46 of 1,904, P = 0.01) after iodine tincture. The difference in mean total hospital costs for patients with contaminated blood cultures and those with sterile blood cultures was $4,100 (95% confidence interval: $740 to $7,400, P = 0.02).
      Conclusions: Iodine tincture is superior to povidone-iodine for venipuncture site antisepsis before blood culture sampling. Because of the high costs associated with contaminated blood cultures, hospitals should consider switching from povidone-iodine to iodine tincture. Reduction of the contamination rate may improve the quality of patient care and reduce hospital costs.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • MacGregor R.R.
        • Beaty H.N.
        Evaluation of positive blood cultures.
        Arch Intern Med. 1972; 130: 84-87
        • Weinstein M.P.
        • Reller L.B.
        • Murphy J.R.
        • Lichtenstein A.
        The clinical significance of positive blood cultures.
        Rev Infect Dis. 1983; 5: 35-53
        • Bates D.W.
        • Goldman L.
        • Lee T.H.
        Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.
        JAMA. 1991; 265: 365-369
        • Strand C.L.
        • Wajsbort R.R.
        • Sturmann K.
        Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate.
        JAMA. 1993; : 1004-1006
        • Little J.R.
        • Trovillion E.
        • Fraser V.
        High frequency of pseudobacteremia at a university hospital.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18: 200-202
        • Weinstein M.P.
        • Towns M.L.
        • Quartey S.M.
        • et al.
        The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s.
        Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 24: 609-619
        • King T.C.
        • Price P.B.
        An evaluation of iodophors as skin antiseptics.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963; 116: 361-365
        • Goldman M.
        • Roy G.
        • Frechette N.
        • Decary F.
        • Masssicotte L.
        • Delage G.
        Evaluation of donor skin disinfection methods.
        Transfusion. 1997; 37: 309-312
        • Weinbaum F.I.
        • Lavie S.
        • Danek M.
        • Sixsmith D.
        • Heinrich G.F.
        • Mills S.S.
        Doing it right the first time.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35: 563-565
        • Kahn M.G.
        • Steib S.A.
        • Dunagan W.C.
        • Fraser V.J.
        Monitoring expert system performance using continuous user feedback.
        J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 1996; : 216-223
        • Charlson M.E.
        • Pompei P.
        • Ales K.L.
        • MacKenzie C.R.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies.
        J Chron Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
        • Taplin D.
        • Rebel G.
        • Zaias N.
        The human skin as a source of Mima-Herellea infections.
        JAMA. 1963; 186: 952-955
        • Glew R.H.
        • Moellering R.C.
        • Kunz L.J.
        Infections with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Herrellea vaginicola).
        Medicine. 1977; 56: 79-97
        • Rannem T.
        • Ladefoged K.
        • Hegnhoj F.
        • Hylander Moller E.
        • Bruun B.
        • Farnum S.
        Catheter-related sepsis in long-term parenteral nutrition with Broviac catheters. An evaluation of different disinfectants.
        Clin Nutrition. 1990; 9: 131-136
      1. Selwyn S, Ellis H. Skin bacteria and skin disinfection reconsidered. BMJ. 1972 Jan 15; 1(793):136–140.

        • Brown E.
        • Wenzel R.P.
        • Hendley J.O.
        Exploration of the microbial anatomy of normal human skin by using plasmid profiles of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
        J Infect Dis. 1989; 160: 644-650
        • Bates D.W.
        • Cook F.C.
        • Goldman L.
        • Lee T.H.
        Predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients. A prospectively validated model.
        Ann Intern Med. 1990; 113: 495-500
        • Welby P.L.
        • Keller D.S.
        • Storch G.A.
        Comparison of automated Difco ESP blood culture system with biphasic BBL Septi-Chek System for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33: 1084-1088
        • Schifman R.B.
        • Pindur A.
        The effect of skin disinfection materials on reducing blood culture contamination.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1993; 99: 536-538
        • Schifman R.B.
        • Strand C.L.
        • Meier F.A.
        • Howanitz P.J.
        Blood culture contamination.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998; 122: 216-221
        • Surdulescu S.
        • Utamsingh D.
        • Shekar R.
        Phlebotomy teams reduce blood-culture contamination rate and save money.
        Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998; 6: 60-62
        • Bryant J.K.
        • Strand C.L.
        Reliability of blood cultures collected from intravascular catheter versus venipuncture.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1987; 88: 113-116
        • Aronson M.D.
        • Bor D.H.
        Blood cultures.
        Ann Int Med. 1987; 106: 246-253