Clinical Studies| Volume 105, ISSUE 4, P266-274, October 1998

What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent?

  • Evelyn C.Y Chan
    Division of General Internal Medicine (ECYC), University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel P Sulmasy
    Requests for reprints should be addressed to Daniel Sulmasy, OFM, MD, PhD, The John J. Conley Department of Ethics, St. Vincents Hospital and Medical Center, 153 W. 11th Street, New York, NY 10011
    Center for Clinical Bioethics and the Division of General Internal Medicine (DPS), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.USA
    Search for articles by this author


      Purpose: Since prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is controversial, some authorities recommend that patients give informed consent before testing. We identified and compared what facts experts and patients thought men should know.
      Subjects and Methods: We recruited a Delphi panel of national experts (6 urologists and 6 non-urologists) and conducted 6 focus groups of couples (48 subjects) with 24 screened and unscreened men from a university hospital. We ranked key facts that experts and couples thought men ought to know before consenting to PSA screening and conducted a multidisciplinary focus group to help interpret the findings.
      Results: All participants would disclose that false positive and false negative results can occur and that it is not known whether PSA screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. The 12 experts would disclose the uncertain benefits of treating early, localized prostate cancer. All 24 couples would disclose that the PSA test is a blood test and that patients may worry about results. The 6 urologists would disclose that prostate cancer is often incurable when symptoms appear; the 6 non-urologists, that it can be asymptomatic. The 12 couples with screened men would disclose that the PSA test can detect cancer sooner than the digital rectal examination; the 12 couples with unscreened men, that PSA testing is controversial.
      Conclusions: Physicians and patients agree upon some facts that men should know about PSA screening before giving informed consent. However, physicians fail to emphasize other facts that patients find important. Physicians may differ by expertise; patients, by experience. Our findings provide content for informed consent for PSA screening, and our method may be useful for other controversial tests.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Woolf S.H.
        Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen—an examination of the evidence.
        NEJM. 1995; 333: 1401-1405
      1. Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. American Urological Association Executive Committee Report. Baltimore, Md: American Urological Association; May 1992.

        • Mettlin C.
        • Jones G.
        • Averett H.
        • et al.
        Defining and updating the American Cancer Society guidelines for the cancer-related checkup.
        CA: Cancer Clin J. 1993; 43: 42-46
      2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.

      3. Physician Data Query [computer database]. Prostate cancer screening state-of-the-art statement. Bethesda, Md: National Cance r Institute; 1996.

        • Gohagan J.K.
        • Prorok P.C.
        • Kramer B.S.
        • Cornett J.E.
        Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute.
        J Urol. 1994; 152: 1905-1909
        • Kramer B.S.
        • Brown M.L.
        • Prorok P.C.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer screening: what we know and what we need to know.
        Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119: 914-923
        • Wilt T.
        • Brawer M.K.
        The prostate cancer intervention versus observation trial: a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy versus expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
        J Urol. 1994; 152: 1910-1914
        • American College of Physicians
        Clinical guideline: screening for prostate cancer.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 480-484
      4. Glode ML. Prostate cancer screening: a place for informed consent? Hosp Pract 1994;September 15;29(9):8–12.

        • Brett A.S.
        The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1995; 10: 266-270
        • Hahn D.L.
        • Roberts R.G.
        PSA screening for asymptomatic prostate cancer.
        J Fam Pract. 1993; 37: 432-435
        • Marshall K.G.
        Screening for prostate cancer.
        Can Fam Phys. 1993; 39: 2385-2390
        • Beauchamp T.L.
        • Childress J.F.
        Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York1994: 120-188
        • Faden R.R.
        • Beauchamp T.L.
        A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press, New York1986
        • Sprung C.L.
        • Winick B.J.
        Informed consent in theory and practice.
        Crit Care Med. 1989; 17: 1346-1354
        • Sulmasy D.P.
        • Lehmann L.S.
        • Levine D.M.
        • Faden R.R.
        Patient’s perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures.
        J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5: 189-194
        • White C.
        • Mason A.
        • Feehan M.
        • Templeton P.A.
        Informed consent for percutaneous lung biopsy.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165: 1139-1142
      5. Lidz CW, Meisel A, Holden JL, et al. Informed consent and the structure of medical care. In: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making Health Care Decisions. Volume II. Appendices. Empirical studies of informed consent. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982:317–410.

        • Stanley B.
        • Guido J.
        • Stanley M.
        • DiAnn S.
        The elderly patient and informed consent: empirical findings.
        JAMA. 1984; 252: 1302-1306
        • Geller G.
        • Botkin J.R.
        • Green M.J.
        • et al.
        Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 1467-1474
        • Delbecq A.L.
        • Van de Ven A.H.
        • Gustafson D.H.
        Group Techniques for Program Planning. Green Briar Press, Middleton, Wisconsin1986
      6. Health Promotion for Men 50+. American Association of Retired Persons, Washington, DC1994
        • Rubenstein L.
        Strategies to overcome barriers to early detection of cancer among older adults.
        Cancer. 1994; 74: 2190-2193
        • Stair J.
        Public awareness of screening programs.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992; 19: 93-94
        • Mainous III, A.G.
        • Hagen M.D.
        Public awareness of prostate cancer and the prostate specific antigen test.
        Cancer Pract. 1994; 2: 217-221
        • Flood A.B.
        • Wennberg J.E.
        • Nease R.F.
        • et al.
        The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1996; 11: 342-349
      7. Jaroff L. The man’s cancer. Time 1996;April 1:58–65.

      8. Grove A. Taking on prostate cancer. Fortune 1996;May 13:55–72.

      9. Stipp D. The gender gap in cancer research. Fortune 1996;May 13:74–76.

        • McCoy C.B.
        • Anwyl R.S.
        • Metsch L.R.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer in Florida.
        Cancer Pract. 1995; 3: 88-93
        • Diefenbach P.N.
        • Ganz P.A.
        • Pawlow A.J.
        • Guthrie D.
        Screening by the prostate-specific antigen test.
        J Cancer Educ. 1996; 11: 39-44
        • Denmark-Wahnefried W.
        • Strigo T.
        • Catoe K.
        • et al.
        Knowledge, beliefs and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screening.
        Urology. 1995; 46: 346-3451
        • Wolf A.M.D.
        • Nasser J.F.
        • Wolf A.M.
        • Schorling J.B.
        The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.
        Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 1333-1336
        • Wolf A.M.D.
        • Philbrick J.T.
        • Schorling J.B.
        Predictors of interest in prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent.
        Am J Med. 1997; 103: 308-314
        • Ingelfinger F.J.
        Informed (but uneducated) consent.
        NEJM. 1972; 287: 465-466
      10. Marshall KG. Informed consent for tests for prostate cancer. JAMA 1995;274:127–128. Letter.

        • Lidz C.W.
        • Appelbaum P.S.
        • Meisel J.D.
        Two models of implementing informed consent.
        Arch Intern Med. 1998; 148: 1385-1389
        • Giardiello F.M.
        • Brensinger J.D.
        • Petersen G.M.
        • et al.
        The use and interpretation of commercial apc gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis.
        NEJM. 1997; 336: 823-827