Advertisement
Clinical Research Study|Articles in Press

The association between PCSK9 inhibitor use and sepsis – A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials

      Clinical Significance

      • PCSK9 inhibitors are a class of novel, potent lipid-lowering therapies.
      • Respiratory infections are common adverse events reported by PCSK9 inhibitor users.
      • This meta-analysis found no association of PCSK9 inhibitor use with sepsis and severe infections.

      ABSTRACT

      Aims

      To determine the impact of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor use on incident sepsis and other severe infections.

      Methods

      We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrial.gov up to September 14, 2021 for double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials of alirocumab, evolocumab, or inclisiran with >100 participants in each arm and report of serious adverse events related to infection. Data were synthesized with the fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel model to generate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each outcome for PCSK9 inhibitor versus placebo. Main outcome was sepsis. Other outcomes were total severe infections, severe bacterial and viral infections, and severe organ system-specific infections including respiratory tract, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tract infections.

      Results

      Twenty studies of 64,984 participants were included (alirocumab: n=7; evolocumab: n=9; inclisiran: n=4). Sepsis was reported in 292 (0.51%) participants from 11 trials (PCSK9 inhibitor 0.47%; placebo 0.56%). PCSK9 inhibitor use was not associated with risk of sepsis compared with placebo (Summary RR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.67-1.07, P=.16); nor was it associated with any severe infection (0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.03), severe bacterial (0.96, 95%CI 0.81-1.14) and viral infections (1.03, 95%CI 0.78-1.37); nor with any severe organ system-specific infection (all P values >0.05). The between-study heterogeneity in all analyses was small.

      Conclusion

      There was neither a beneficial nor a harmful association between PCSK9 inhibitors and risk of sepsis or severe infections. These findings provide reassurance regarding the safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients who are concerned about potential drug side effects related to infections.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Karatasakis A
        • Danek BA
        • Karacsonyi J
        • et al.
        Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A Meta-Analysis of 35 Randomized Controlled Trials.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006910
        • Reinhart K
        • Daniels R
        • Kissoon N
        • Machado FR
        • Schachter RD
        • Finfer S.
        Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 414-417https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1707170
        • Yuan Y
        • Wu W
        • Sun S
        • Zhang Y
        • Chen Z.
        PCSK9: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Sepsis.
        J Immunol Res. 2020; 20202687692https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2687692
        • Momtazi AA
        • Banach M
        • Sahebkar A.
        PCSK9 inhibitors in sepsis: a new potential indication?.
        Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017; 26: 137-139https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2017.1272570
        • Feng Q
        • Wei WQ
        • Chaugai S
        • et al.
        A Genetic Approach to the Association Between PCSK9 and Sepsis.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2e1911130https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11130
        • Walley KR
        • Thain KR
        • Russell JA
        • et al.
        PCSK9 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and septic shock outcome.
        Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6: 258ra143https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008782
        • Boyd JH
        • Fjell CD
        • Russell JA
        • Sirounis D
        • Cirstea MS
        • Walley KR.
        Increased Plasma PCSK9 Levels Are Associated with Reduced Endotoxin Clearance and the Development of Acute Organ Failures during Sepsis.
        J Innate Immun. 2016; 8: 211-220https://doi.org/10.1159/000442976
        • Leung AKK
        • Genga KR
        • Topchiy E
        • et al.
        Reduced Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) function increases lipoteichoic acid clearance and improves outcomes in Gram positive septic shock patients.
        Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 10588https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46745-0
        • Genga KR
        • Lo C
        • Cirstea MS
        • et al.
        Impact of PCSK9 loss-of-function genotype on 1-year mortality and recurrent infection in sepsis survivors.
        EBioMedicine. 2018; 38: 257-264https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.032
        • Innocenti F
        • Gori AM
        • Giusti B
        • et al.
        Plasma PCSK9 levels and sepsis severity: an early assessment in the emergency department.
        Clin Exp Med. 2021; 21: 101-107https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-020-00658-9
        • Vuorio A
        • Kovanen PT.
        PCSK9 inhibitors for COVID-19: an opportunity to enhance the antiviral action of interferon in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.
        J Intern Med. 2021; 289: 749-751https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13210
        • Gan ES
        • Tan HC
        • Le DHT
        • et al.
        Dengue virus induces PCSK9 expression to alter antiviral responses and disease outcomes.
        J Clin Invest. 2020; 130: 5223-5234https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI137536
        • Scicali R
        • Di Pino A
        • Piro S
        • Rabuazzo AM
        • Purrello F.
        May statins and PCSK9 inhibitors be protective from COVID-19 in familial hypercholesterolemia subjects?.
        Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020; 30: 1068-1069https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.003
        • Gurgoze MT
        • Muller-Hansma AHG
        • Schreuder MM
        • Galema-Boers AMH
        • Boersma E
        • Roeters van Lennep JE
        Adverse Events Associated With PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Real-World Experience.
        Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 105: 496-504https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1193
      1. Australian product information - Leqvio®(Inclisiran). Accessible from: http://www.guildlink.com.au/gc/ws/nv/pi.cfm?product=nvpleqin. Last Accessed by: 29 Nov 2021.

        • Khademi F
        • Momtazi-Borojeni AA
        • Reiner Z
        • Banach M
        • Al-Rasadi KA
        • Sahebkar A.
        PCSK9 and infection: A potentially useful or dangerous association?.
        J Cell Physiol. 2018; 233: 2920-2927https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26040
        • Liberati A
        • Altman DG
        • Tetzlaff J
        • et al.
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2700https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
      2. Highlights of prescribing information - PRALUENT®(Alirocumab). Accessible from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/125559s029s030lbl.pdf; Last Accessed by: 29 Nov 2021.

      3. Highlights of prescribing information - REPATHA® (Evolocumab) Accessible from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/125522orig2s000lbl.pdf. Last Accessed by: 29 Nov 2021.

      4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Inclisiran for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. Accessible from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta733. Last accessed by: 29 Nov 2021.

      5. FDA approves add-on therapy to lower cholesterol among certain high-risk adults. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-add-therapy-lower-cholesterol-among-certain-high-risk-adults.

        • Wu L
        • Ingle T
        • Liu Z
        • et al.
        Study of serious adverse drug reactions using FDA-approved drug labeling and MedDRA.
        BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20: 97https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2628-5
      6. Department of Health and Human Service. 42CFR Part 11. Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-09-21/pdf/2016-22129.pdf.

        • Giugliano RP
        • Desai NR
        • Kohli P
        • et al.
        Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in combination with a statin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (LAPLACE-TIMI 57): A randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 study.
        The Lancet. 2012; 380: 2007-2017
        • Robinson JG
        • Nedergaard BS
        • Rogers WJ
        • et al.
        Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 1870-1882https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.4030
        • Blom DJ
        • Hala T
        • Bolognese M
        • et al.
        A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1809-1819https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1316222
        • Kastelein JJ
        • Ginsberg HN
        • Langslet G
        • et al.
        ODYSSEY FH I and FH II: 78 week results with alirocumab treatment in 735 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.
        Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 2996-3003https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv370
        • Robinson JG
        • Farnier M
        • Krempf M
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1489-1499https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501031
        • Kereiakes DJ
        • Robinson JG
        • Cannon CP
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab among high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated statin therapy: the ODYSSEY COMBO I study.
        Am Heart J. 2015; 169 (e13): 906-915https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.004
        • Kiyosue A
        • Honarpour N
        • Kurtz C
        • Xue A
        • Wasserman SM
        • Hirayama A.
        A Phase 3 Study of Evolocumab (AMG 145) in Statin-Treated Japanese Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk.
        Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117: 40-47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.021
        • Roth EM
        • Moriarty PM
        • Bergeron J
        • et al.
        A phase III randomized trial evaluating alirocumab 300 mg every 4 weeks as monotherapy or add-on to statin: ODYSSEY CHOICE I.
        Atherosclerosis. 2016; 254: 254-262https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.043
        • Nicholls SJ
        • Puri R
        • Anderson T
        • et al.
        Effect of Evolocumab on Progression of Coronary Disease in Statin-Treated Patients: the GLAGOV Randomized Clinical Trial.
        JAMA. 2016; 316: 2373-2384https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16951
        • Sabatine MS
        • Giugliano RP
        • Keech AC
        • et al.
        Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1713-1722https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615664
        • Ray KK
        • Landmesser U
        • Leiter LA
        • et al.
        Inclisiran in patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated LDL cholesterol.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1430-1440
        • Leiter LA
        • Cariou B
        • Muller-Wieland D
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: The ODYSSEY DM-INSULIN randomized trial.
        Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 19: 1781-1792
        • Schwartz GG
        • Szarek M
        • Bhatt DL
        • et al.
        Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2097-2107
        • Lorenzatti AJ
        • Eliaschewitz FG
        • Chen Y
        • et al.
        Randomised study of evolocumab in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia on background statin: primary results of the BERSON clinical trial.
        Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 21: 1455-1463https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13680
        • Rosenson RS
        • Daviglus ML
        • Handelsman Y
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: primary results of the randomised controlled BANTING study.
        Diabetologia. 2019; 62: 948-958https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4856-7
        • Boccara F
        • Kumar PN
        • Caramelli B
        • et al.
        Evolocumab in HIV-Infected Patients With Dyslipidemia: Primary Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind BEIJERINCK Study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 2570-2584
        • Raal FJ
        • Kallend D
        • Ray KK
        • et al.
        Inclisiran for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1520-1530
        • Ray KK
        • Wright RS
        • Kallend D
        • et al.
        Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1507-1519https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912387
        • Janik MJ
        • Urbach DV
        • van Nieuwenhuizen E
        • et al.
        Alirocumab treatment and neurocognitive function according to the CANTAB scale in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        Atherosclerosis. 2021; 331: 20-27https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.06.913
        • Grundy SM
        • Stone NJ
        • Bailey AL
        • et al.
        2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: e1082-ee143https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625
        • Mankowski RT
        • Yende S
        • Angus DC.
        Long-term impact of sepsis on cardiovascular health.
        Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45: 78-81https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5173-1
        • Walkey AJ.
        Preventing cardiovascular complications of acute infection: a missed opportunity?.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: 1375-1377https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008712
        • Corrales-Medina VF
        • Musher DM
        • Shachkina S
        • Chirinos JA.
        Acute pneumonia and the cardiovascular system.
        Lancet. 2013 Feb 9; 381 (Epub 2013 Jan 16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61266-5): 496-505https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61266-5
        • Fathi M
        • Markazi-Moghaddam N
        • Ramezankhani A.
        A systematic review on risk factors associated with sepsis in patients admitted to intensive care units.
        Aust Crit Care. 2019; 32: 155-164https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.02.005
        • Koh GC
        • Peacock SJ
        • van der Poll T
        • Wiersinga WJ.
        The impact of diabetes on the pathogenesis of sepsis.
        Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 31: 379-388https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1337-4
        • Fang L
        • Karakiulakis G
        • Roth M.
        Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?.
        Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8: e21https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8
        • Navarese EP
        • Podhajski P
        • Gurbel PA
        • et al.
        PCSK9 Inhibition During the Inflammatory Stage of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023; 81: 224-234https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.030