Advertisement

Environmentally Mediated Health Disparities

Published:February 22, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.02.008

      Abstract

      We describe important settings where environmental exposure leads to disease disparities. Lead exposure in urban settings disproportionately impacts the urban Black poor. Native Americans have been forcibly relocated to areas of the West that have arsenic-contaminated groundwater or exposure to radionuclides near mines and nuclear development. Latino farm workers are disproportionately exposed to pesticides and herbicides. These chemicals are associated with cancer, neuropsychiatric disorders, renal failure, and respiratory disorders. The rural poor, both white and of color, are disproportionately impacted by hydraulic fracturing, exposing residents to volatile organic compounds such as toluene and benzene and heavy metals such as lead and arsenic. The urban and rural poor are both exposed to air pollution that significantly impact health. Short- and long-term ambient air pollution exposure has been associated with all-cause cardiovascular disease, stroke, blood pressure, and ischemic heart disease. Cancer due to air pollution has disproportionately impacted poor communities like “Cancer Alley” where numerous industrial sources are geographically clustered. Understanding local environmental hazards and available resources to address them can enhance the quality of medical care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Crowley R
        • Mathew S
        • Hilden D
        Environmental health: a position paper from the American College of Physicians.
        Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175: 1591-1593https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-1864
        • Senay E
        • Hantel A.
        Environmental health: translating policy into action.
        Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175: 1612-1613https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-2808
        • Institute of Medicine (US) Subcommittee on Physician Shortage
        Addressing the Physician Shortage in Occupational and Environmental Medicine: Report of a Study.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC1991https://doi.org/10.17226/9494
        • Craft-Blacksheare MG
        Lessons learned from the crisis in Flint, Michigan regarding the effects of contaminated water on maternal and child health.
        J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017; 46: 258-266https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.10.012
        • White D
        • Gala T.
        Environmental Injustice? Disparities in the exposure to environmental lead poisoning and risks among children in the Chicago neighborhoods.
        Am J Public Health. 2022; 10: 124-133https://doi.org/10.12691/ajphr-10-3-5
        • Caballero-Gómez H
        • White HK
        • O'Shea MJ
        • et al.
        Spatial analysis and lead-risk assessment of Philadelphia, USA.
        Geo Health. 2022; 6e2021GH000519https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000519
        • Mason LH
        • Harp JP
        • Han DY.
        Pb neurotoxicity: neuropsychological effects of lead toxicity.
        Biomed Res Int. 2014; 840547https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/8405475
        • Yeter D
        • Banks EC
        • Aschner M.
        Disparity in risk factor severity for early childhood blood lead among predominantly African-American black children: the 1999 to 2010 US NHANES.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 1552https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051552
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Testing children for lead poisoning. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/prevention/testing-children-for-lead-poisoning.htm. Accessed January 10, 2023.

        • Hu H
        • Rabinowitz M
        • Smith D.
        Bone lead as a biological marker in epidemiologic studies of chronic toxicity: conceptual paradigms.
        Environ Health Perspect. 1998; 106: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.981061
        • Weisskopf MG
        • Weuve J
        • Nie H
        • et al.
        Association of cumulative lead exposure with Parkinson's disease.
        Environ. Health Perspect. 2010; 118: 160-1613https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10 02339
        • Gorell JM
        • Peterson EL
        • Rybicki BA
        • Johnson CC
        Multiple risk factors for Parkinson's disease.
        J Neurol Sci. 2004; 217: 169-174https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jns.2003.09.014
        • Chin-Chan M
        • Navarro-Yepes J
        • Quintanilla-Vega B.
        Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases.
        Front Cell Neurosci. 2015; 10: 124https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00124
        • Reuben A
        • Schaefer JD
        • Moffitt TE
        • et al.
        Association of childhood lead exposure with adult personality traits and lifelong mental health.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 2019; 76: 418-425https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry 2018.4192
        • Lewis J
        • Hoover J
        • MacKenzie D.
        Mining and environmental health disparities in Native American communities.
        Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017; 4: 130-141https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0140-5
        • Lynch RA
        • Malcoe LH
        • Halinka L
        • et al.
        The relationship between residential lead exposures and elevated blood lead levels in a rural mining community.
        J Environ Health. 2000; 63: 9-15
        • Moore-Nall A
        The legacy of uranium development on or near Indian reservations and health implications rekindling public awareness.
        Geosciences. 2015; 5: 15-29https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences5010015
      2. US Geological Survey (USGS). Groundwater Quality in Colorado Plateau Aquifers, Western USA. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2021/3012/fs20213012.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2023.

      3. National Center for Farmworker Health. A Profile of Migrant Health. Available at: http://www.ncfh.org/uploads/3/8/6/8/38685499/uds_report_2020_final.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2023.

        • Arcury TA
        • Grzywacz JG
        • Isom S
        • et al.
        Seasonal variation in the measurement of urinary pesticide metabolites among Latino farmworkers in eastern North Carolina.
        Int J Occup Environ Health. 2009; 15: 339-350https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2009.15.4.339
      4. Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics. Clinic Directory. Available at: http://www.aoec.org/index.htm. Accessed January 12, 2023.

        • Zwickl K.
        The demographics of fracking: a spatial analysis for four US states.
        Ecol Econ. 2019; 161: 202-215https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.001
        • Johnston JE
        • Lim E
        • Roh H.
        Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: a review of the evidence.
        Sci Total Environ. 2019; 20: 187-199https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.483
        • McDermott-Levy R
        • Kaktins N
        • Sattler B
        Fracking, the environment, and health.
        Am J Nurs. 2013; 113: 45-51https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000431272.83277.f4
        • Clark CJ
        • Johnson NP
        • Soriano Jr, M
        • et al.
        Unconventional oil and gas development exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case–control study in Pennsylvania, 2009–2017.
        Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130087001https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11092
        • Ogneva-Himmelberger Y
        • Huang L.
        Spatial distribution of unconventional gas wells and human populations in the Marcellus Shale in the United States: vulnerability analysis.
        Appl Geography. 2015; 60: 65-174https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.011
      5. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Private Drinking Water Wells. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/privatewells. Accessed November18, 2022.

      6. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Private Well Density Map. Available at:https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7ffe9ca0a2044e9c8e2b8f256c99525f. Accessed November 18, 2022.

      7. Groundwater Protection Council (GWPC). Fracfocus. Available at: https://fracfocus.org/. Accessed November 20, 2022.

        • Hajat A
        • Hsia C
        • O'Neill MS
        Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review.
        Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015; 2: 440-450https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0069-5
        • Wang Y
        • Puthussery JV
        • Yu H
        • et al.
        Sources of cellular oxidative potential of water-soluble fine ambient particulate matter in the Midwestern United States.
        J Hazard Mater. 2022; 425127777https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127777
      8. National Interagency Coordination Center Map. Homepage. Available at: https://www.nifc.gov/nicc/index.htm. Accessed November 20, 2022.

        • Aguilera R
        • Corringham T
        • Gershunov A
        • et al.
        Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California.
        Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 1493https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21708-0
      9. World Health Organization (WHO) Interagency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Outdoor Air Pollution: A Leading Environmental Cause of Cancer Deaths. Available at: https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr221_E.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2022.

      10. Wood A, Howarth M. Federal and state regulatory systems perpetuate environmental injustice in the United States: industrial ethylene oxide emissions as a case study [e-pub ahead of print]. Environmental Justice. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0120. Accessed November 20, 2022.

        • Long EC
        Controlled human exposure to diesel exhaust: results illuminate health effects of traffic-related air pollution and inform future directions.
        Part Fibre Toxicol. 2022; 19: 11
        • Nyadanu SD
        • Dunne J
        • Tessema G
        • et al.
        Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: an umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
        Environ Pollut. 2022; 306119465https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.11946
        • Chen J
        • Fang J
        • Zhang Y
        • et al.
        Associations of adverse pregnancy outcomes with high ambient air pollution exposure: results from the Project ELEFANT.
        Sci Total Environ. 2021; 761143218https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143218
        • Niu Z
        • Habre R
        • Chavez TA
        • et al.
        Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight by maternal individual- and neighborhood-level stressors.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e2238174https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38174
        • Marshall L
        • Weir E
        • Abelsohn A
        • et al.
        Identifying and managing adverse environmental health effects: 1. Taking an exposure history.
        CMAJ. 2002; 166: 1049-1055
      11. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Homepage. Available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov. Accessed January 10, 2023.