Advertisement

The Grade Debate: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and perspectives on clerkship assessment across the UME to GME continuum

Published:January 09, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.01.001
      Student assessment in core clerkships guides learning and the achievement of expectations. However, tensions persist on the role of grading

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Low D
        • Pollack SW
        • Liao ZC
        • et al.
        Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Grading in Medical School.
        Teach Learn Med. 2019; 31 (Oct-Dec 2019): 487-496https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724
      1. Grading Systems Used in Medical School Programs. Association of American Medical Colleges. Accessed October 20, 2022, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/grading-systems-used-medical-school-programs

        • McDonald JA
        • Lai CJ
        • Lin MYC
        • O'Sullivan PS
        • Hauer KE.
        There Is a Lot of Change Afoot": A Qualitative Study of Faculty Adaptation to Elimination of Tiered Grades With Increased Emphasis on Feedback in Core Clerkships.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96 (02 01): 263-270https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003730
        • Bullock JL
        • Lai CJ
        • Lockspeiser T
        • et al.
        In Pursuit of Honors: A Multi-Institutional Study of Students' Perceptions of Clerkship Evaluation and Grading.
        Acad Med. 2019; 94 (11): S48-S56https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002905
        • Hernandez CA
        • Daroowalla F
        • LaRochelle JS
        • et al.
        Determining Grades in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey of Clerkship Directors.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96 (02 01): 249-255https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003815
        • Spring L
        • Robillard D
        • Gehlbach L
        • Simas TA.
        Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students' well-being and academic outcomes.
        Med Educ. 2011; 45 (Sep): 867-877https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03989.x
        • Reed DA
        • Shanafelt TD
        • Satele DW
        • et al.
        Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study.
        Acad Med. Nov 2011; 86: 1367-1373https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182305d81
        • Seligman L
        • Abdullahi A
        • Teherani A
        • Hauer KE.
        From Grading to Assessment for Learning: A Qualitative Study of Student Perceptions Surrounding Elimination of Core Clerkship Grades and Enhanced Formative Feedback.
        Teach Learn Med. 2021; 33 (Jun-Jul 2021): 314-325https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.1847654
        • Bullock JL
        • Seligman L
        • Lai CJ
        • O'Sullivan PS
        • Hauer KE.
        Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.
        Teach Learn Med. 2022; 34 (Apr-May 2022): 198-208https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1922285
      2. Dweck C. What Having a “Growth Mindset” Actually Means. Harvard Business Review.1-5.

        • Dhaliwal G
        • Hauer KE.
        Excellence in medical training: developing talent-not sorting it.
        Perspect Med Educ. 2021; 10 (12): 356-361https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00678-5
        • Richardson D
        • Kinnear B
        • Hauer KE
        • et al.
        Growth mindset in competency-based medical education.
        Med Teach. Jul 2021; 43: 751-757https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928036
        • Teherani A
        • Hauer KE
        • Fernandez A
        • King TE
        • Lucey C.
        How Small Differences in Assessed Clinical Performance Amplify to Large Differences in Grades and Awards: A Cascade With Serious Consequences for Students Underrepresented in Medicine.
        Acad Med. 2018; 93 (09): 1286-1292https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002323
        • Colson ER
        • Pérez M
        • Blaylock L
        • et al.
        Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Case Study: A Process for Understanding and Addressing Bias in Clerkship Grading.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95 (12): S131-S135https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003702
        • Hill KA
        • Desai MM
        • Chaudhry SI
        • et al.
        Association of Marginalized Identities With Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society and Gold Humanism Honor Society Membership Among Medical Students.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5 (09 01)e2229062https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29062
        • Lucey CR
        • Hauer KE
        • Boatright D
        • Fernandez A.
        Medical Education's Wicked Problem: Achieving Equity in Assessment for Medical Learners.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95 (12): S98-S108https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003717
        • Norcini J
        • Anderson MB
        • Bollela V
        • et al.
        2018 Consensus framework for good assessment.
        Med Teach. 2018; 40 (11): 1102-1109https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
        • Fyfe M
        • Horsburgh J
        • Blitz J
        • Chiavaroli N
        • Kumar S
        • Cleland J
        The do's, don'ts and don't knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools.
        Perspect Med Educ. 2022; 11 (01): 1-14https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00696-3
        • Alexander EK
        • Osman NY
        • Walling JL
        • Mitchell VG.
        Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools.
        Acad Med. 2012; 87 (Aug): 1070-1076https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0a2a
        • Zaidi NLB
        • Kreiter CD
        • Castaneda PR
        • et al.
        Generalizability of Competency Assessment Scores Across and Within Clerkships: How Students, Assessors, and Clerkships Matter.
        Acad Med. 2018; 93 (08): 1212-1217https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002262
        • Wass V
        • Van der Vleuten C
        • Shatzer J
        • Jones R.
        Assessment of clinical competence.
        Lancet. 2001; 357 (Mar 24): 945-949https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5
        • Gonnella JS
        • Erdmann JB
        • Hojat M.
        An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system.
        Med Educ. Apr 2004; 38: 425-434https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01774.x
        • Durning SJ
        • Hemmer PA.
        Commentary: grading: what is it good for?.
        Acad Med. Aug 2012; 87: 1002-1004https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0b3a
        • Greenburg DL
        • Durning SJ
        • Cohen DL
        • Cruess D
        • Jackson JL.
        Identifying medical students likely to exhibit poor professionalism and knowledge during internship.
        J Gen Intern Med. Dec 2007; 22: 1711-1717https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0405-z
        • Durning SJ
        • Dong T
        • Hemmer PA
        • et al.
        Are commonly used premedical school or medical school measures associated with board certification?.
        Mil Med. Apr 2015; 180: 18-23https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00569
        • Cullen MW
        • Reed DA
        • Halvorsen AJ
        • et al.
        Selection criteria for internal medicine residency applicants and professionalism ratings during internship.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2011; 86 (Mar): 197-202https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0655
      3. ERAS Statistics. Association of American Medical Colleges. Accessed March 30, 2022, https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/interactive-data/eras-statistics-data

        • Angus SV
        • Williams CM
        • Stewart EA
        • Sweet M
        • Kisielewski M
        • Willett LL.
        Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors' Screening Practices and Perceptions About Recruitment Challenges.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95 (04): 582-589https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003086
        • Mun F
        • Scott AR
        • Cui D
        • Chisty A
        • Hennrikus WL
        • Hennrikus EF.
        Internal medicine residency program director perceptions of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring: A cross-sectional survey.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100 (04 16): e25284https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025284
        • Kenny S
        • McInnes M
        • Singh V.
        Associations between residency selection strategies and doctor performance: a meta-analysis.
        Med Educ. Aug 2013; 47: 790-800https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12234
        • Golden BP
        • Henschen BL
        • Liss DT
        • Kiely SL
        • Didwania AK.
        Association Between Internal Medicine Residency Applicant Characteristics and Performance on ACGME Milestones During Intern Year.
        J Grad Med Educ. Apr 2021; 13: 213-222https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00603.1
        • Rohe DE
        • Barrier PA
        • Clark MM
        • Cook DA
        • Vickers KS
        • Decker PA.
        The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students.
        Mayo Clin Proc. Nov 2006; 81: 1443-1448https://doi.org/10.4065/81.11.1443
        • Bloodgood RA
        • Short JG
        • Jackson JM
        • Martindale JR.
        A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well-being.
        Acad Med. May 2009; 84: 655-662https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819f6d78
        • Guo R
        • Muir J.
        Toronto's Honours/Pass/Fail Debate: The Minority Position.
        University of Toronto Medical Journal. 2008; 85: 95-98
        • Govaerts MJB
        • van der Vleuten CPM
        • Holmboe ES.
        Managing tensions in assessment: moving beyond either-or thinking.
        Med Educ. 2019; 53 (01): 64-75https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13656
        • Hauer KE
        • Williams PM
        • Byerley JS
        • Swails JL
        • Barone MA.
        Blue Skies with Clouds: Envisioning the Future Ideal State and Identifying Ongoing Tensions in the UME-GME Transition.
        Acad Med. 2022; (Aug 9)https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004920
        • Hatala R
        • Sawatsky AP
        • Dudek N
        • Ginsburg S
        • Cook DA.
        Using In-Training Evaluation Report (ITER) Qualitative Comments to Assess Medical Students and Residents: A Systematic Review.
        Acad Med. 2017; 92 (06): 868-879https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001506
        • Rojek AE
        • Khanna R
        • Yim JWL
        • et al.
        Differences in Narrative Language in Evaluations of Medical Students by Gender and Under-represented Minority Status.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34 (05): 684-691https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04889-9
        • Wang A
        • Karunungan KL
        • Shlobin NA
        • et al.
        Residency Program Director Perceptions of Resident Performance Between Graduates of Medical Schools With Pass/Fail Versus Tiered Grading System for Clinical Clerkships: A Meta-Analysis.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96 (11 01): S216-S217https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004321
        • Desai SV
        • Asch DA
        • Bellini LM
        • et al.
        Education Outcomes in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2018; 378: 1494-1508https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800965
      4. Accountability CfP. The Coalition for Physician Accountability's Undergraduate Medical Education-Graduate Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC): Recommendations for Comprehensive Improvement of the UME-GME Transition. https://physicianaccountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/UGRC-Coalition-Report-FINAL.pdf

        • Pincavage AT
        • Osman NY
        • Alexandraki I
        • et al.
        AAIM Recommendations to Promote Equity in the Clerkship Clinical Learning Environment.
        Am J Med. Aug 2022; 135: 1021-1028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.014
        • Lewis K
        • O V
        • Garber AM
        • et al.
        AAIM Recommendations to Improve Learner Transitions.
        Am J Med. 2022; 135 (04): 536-542https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.01.001