Advertisement

When More Is Better: Underused Advanced Imaging Exams That Can Improve Outcomes and Reduce Cost of Care

      Abstract

      Appropriate use of resources is a tenet of care transformation efforts, with a national campaign to reduce low-value imaging. The next level of performance improvement is to bolster evidence-based screening, imaging surveillance, and diagnostic innovation, which can avert more costly, higher-risk elements of unnecessary care like emergent interventions. Clinical scenarios in which underused advanced imaging can improve outcomes and reduce total cost of care are reviewed, including abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance, coronary artery disease diagnosis, and renal mass characterization. Reliable abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance imaging reduces emergency surgery and can be driven by radiologists incorporating best practice standardized recommendations in imaging interpretations. Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with stable and unstable chest pain can reduce downstream resource use while improving outcomes. Preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reliably distinguishes oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma to obviate unnecessary nephrectomy. As technological advances in diagnostic, molecular, and interventional radiology improve our ability to detect and cure disease, analyses of cost effectiveness will be critical to radiology leadership and sustainability in the transition to a value-based reimbursement model.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Medicare.gov. Use of medical imaging, hospital compare. Available at:https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/Outpatient-Measures.html Accessed February 25, 2019.

      2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. MACRA. Available at:https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/value-based-programs/macra-mips-and-apms/macra-mips-and-apms.html. Accessed February 25, 2019.

      3. American College of Radiology. ACR proposes 2018 diagnostic imaging quality measures set. Available at:https://www.acr.org/Practice-Management-Quality-Informatics/Quality-Care-News/Newsletter/Quality-and-Safety-eNews-March-2018/ACR-Proposes-2018-Diagnostic-Imaging-Quality-Measure-Set. Accessed February 25, 2019

      4. US Preventative Services Task Force. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Available at:https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening1. Accessed December 29, 2019

        • van Walraven C
        • Wong J
        • Morant K
        • Jennings A
        • Jetty P
        • Forster A
        Incidence, follow-up, and outcomes of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms..
        J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52: 282-289.e2
        • Mell MW
        • Baker LC
        • Dalman RL
        • Hlatky MA
        Gaps in preoperative surveillance and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms among Medicare beneficiaries.
        J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 583-588
      5. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Follow-up (Without Repair) https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3102391/Narrative/. Accessed April 10, 2021.

        • Chaikof EL
        • Brewster DC
        • Dalman RL
        • et al.
        The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines.
        J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50: 2
        • van Walraven C
        • Wong J
        • Morant K
        • et al.
        The influence of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysm monitoring on patient outcomes.
        J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54: 1290-1297
      6. American College of Radiology. Increasing radiology value in patient care: Standardized evidence-based surveillance recommendations for AAA. Available at:https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/NOINDEX/Abstracts/2018/18063_Ahmed.pdf?la=en. Accessed February 3, 2020

        • Haider AH
        • Obirieze A
        • Velopulos CG
        • et al.
        Incremental cost of emergency versus elective surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 262: 260-266
        • Oliver-Williams C
        • Sweeting MJ
        • Jacomelli J
        • et al.
        Safety of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance in the NAAASP.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: 1371-1380
        • Kim DC
        • Herskovits EH
        • Johnson PT
        Science to practice: IT solutions to drive standardized report recommendations for abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: 865-869
        • Benjamin EJ
        • Muntner P
        • Alonso A
        • et al.
        Heart Disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: e56-e528
      7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Heart Disease Fact Sheet. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fs_heart_disease.htm. Accessed February 9, 2019.

        • Fihn SD
        • Gardin JM
        • Abrams J
        • et al.
        2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2564-2603
        • Dehmer GJ
        • Weaver D
        • Roe MT
        • et al.
        A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2017-2031
        • Gueret P
        • Deux JF
        • Bonello L
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (from the Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study).
        Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111: 471-478
        • Hoffmann U
        • Ferencik M
        • Udelson JE
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).
        Circulation. 2017; 135: 2320-2332
        • Newby D
        CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): An open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 2383-2391
        • Wolny R
        • Pregowski J
        • Kruk M
        • et al.
        Computed tomography angiography versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions in bifurcation lesions – a prospective randomized pilot study.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017; 11: 119-128
        • Williams MC
        • Hunter A
        • Shah ASV
        • et al.
        Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 1759-1768
        • Newby DE
        • Adamson PD
        • Berry C
        • et al.
        Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 924-933
        • Bittencourt MS
        • Hulten EA
        • Murthy VL
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes after evaluation of stable chest pain by coronary computed tomographic angiography versus usual care: a meta-analysis.
        Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9: 1-9
        • Agus AM
        • McKavanagh P
        • Lusk L
        • et al.
        The cost-effectiveness of cardiac computed tomography for patients with stable chest pain.
        Heart. 2016; 102: 356-362
        • McKavanagh P
        • Lusk L
        • Ball PA
        • et al.
        A comparison of cardiac computerized tomography and exercise stress electrocardiogram test for the investigation of stable chest pain: The clinical results of the CAPP randomized prospective trial.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16: 441-448
        • Douglas PS
        • De Bruyne B
        • Pontone G
        • et al.
        1-Year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM Study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 435-445
        • Lubbers M
        • Dedic A
        • Coenen A
        • et al.
        Calcium imaging and selective computed tomography angiography in comparison to functional testing for suspected coronary artery disease: the multicentre, randomized CRESCENT trial.
        Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 1232-1243
        • Van Waardhuizen CN
        • Khanji MY
        • Genders TSS
        • et al.
        Comparative cost-effectiveness of non-invasive imaging tests in patients presenting with chronic stable chest pain with suspected coronary artery disease: A systematic review.
        Eur Hear J - Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016; 2: 245-260
        • Rudziński PN
        • Kruk M
        • Kępka C
        • et al.
        The value of coronary artery computed tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease: CAT-CAD randomized trial.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018; 12: 472-479
        • Knuuti J
        • Wijns W
        • Saraste A
        • et al.
        2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
        Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 407-477
        • Hamilton-Craig C
        • Fifoot A
        • Hansen M
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG–a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177: 867-873
        • Hoffmann U
        • Truong QA
        • Schoenfeld DA
        • et al.
        Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 299-308
        • Litt HI
        • Gatsonis C
        • Snyder B
        • et al.
        CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1393-1403
        • Miller AH
        • Pepe PE
        • Peshock R
        • et al.
        Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 458-467
        • Chang SA
        • Choi SI
        • Choi EK
        • et al.
        Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain.
        Am Heart J. 2008; 156: 375-383
        • El-Hayek G
        • Benjo A
        • Uretsky S
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care strategy for the evaluation of low risk chest pain: are randomized controlled trials and cohort studies showing the same evidence?.
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177: 238-245
        • D'Ascenzo F
        • Cerrato E
        • Biondi-Zoccai G
        • et al.
        Coronary computed tomographic angiography for detection of coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 14: 782-789
        • Goldstein JA
        • Chinnaiyan KM
        • Abidov A
        • et al.
        The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1414-1422
        • Bunch AM
        A systematic review of the predictive value of a coronary computed tomography angiography as compared with coronary calcium scoring in alternative noninvasive technique in detecting coronary artery disease and evaluating acute coronary syndrome in an acute care setting.
        Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2012; 31: 73-83
        • Takakuwa KM
        • Keith SW
        • Estepa AT
        • Shofer FS
        A meta-analysis of 64-section coronary CT angiography findings for predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.
        Acad Radiol. 2011; 18: 1522-1528
        • Ferencik M
        • Liu T
        • Mayrhofer T
        • et al.
        Hs-troponin I followed by CT angiography improves acute coronary syndrome risk stratification accuracy and work-up in acute chest pain patients: results from ROMICAT II Trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 1272-1281
        • Ferencik M
        • Mayrhofer T
        • Puchner SB
        • et al.
        Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain–Results from the ROMICAT II trial.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015; 9: 538-545
        • Puchner SB
        • Liu T
        • Mayrhofer T
        • et al.
        High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 684-692
        • Dedic A
        • Lubbers MM
        • Schaap J
        • et al.
        Coronary CT angiography for suspected ACS in the era of high-sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 16-26
        • Linde JJ
        • Hove JD
        • Sørgaard M
        • et al.
        Long-term clinical impact of coronary CT angiography in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: the randomized controlled CATCH Trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 1404-1413
        • Linde JJ
        • Kofoed KF
        • Sørgaard M
        • et al.
        Cardiac computed tomography guided treatment strategy in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: results from the randomised, controlled trial: CArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain (CATCH).
        Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 5257-5262
        • Levsky JM
        • Spevack DM
        • Travin MI
        • et al.
        Coronary computed tomography angiography versus radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chest pain admitted to telemetry: a randomized trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163: 174-183
        • Gill IS
        • Aron M
        • Gervais DA
        • Jewett MA
        Clinical practice. Small renal mass.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 624-634
        • Herts BR
        • Silverman SG
        • Hindman NM
        • et al.
        Management of the incidental renal mass on CT: a white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: 264-273
        • Reynolds AM
        • Porter KK
        Characterizing indeterminate renal masses with molecular imaging: the role of 99m Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2017; 18: 86
        • Patel HD
        • Johnson MH
        • Pierorazio PM
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy and risks of biopsy in the diagnosis of a renal mass suspicious for localized renal cell carcinoma: systematic review of the literature.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 1340-1347
        • Patel HD
        • Semerjian A
        • Gupta M
        • et al.
        Surgical removal of renal tumors with low metastatic potential based on clinical radiographic size: a systematic review of the literature.
        Urol Oncol. 2019; 37: 519-524
        • Asnis-Alibozek AG
        • Fine MJ
        • Russo P
        • et al.
        Cost of care for malignant and benign renal masses.
        Am J Manag Care. 2013; 19: 617-624
        • Johnson DC
        • Vukina J
        • Smith AB
        • et al.
        Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate.
        J Urol. 2015; 193: 30-35
        • Gorin MA
        • Rowe SP
        • Baras AS
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors.
        Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 413-416
        • Rowe SP
        • Gorin MA
        • Gordetsky J
        • et al.
        Initial experience using 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT for the differentiation of oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma.
        Clin Nucl Med. 2015; 40: 309-313
        • Tzortzakakis A
        • Gustafsson O
        • Karlsson M
        • Ekström-Ehn L
        • Ghaffarpour R
        • Axelsson R
        Visual evaluation and differentiation of renal oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas by means of.
        EJNMMI Res. 2017; 7: 29
        • Sheikhbahaei S
        • Jones CS
        • Porter KK
        • et al.
        Defining the added value of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT to conventional cross-sectional imaging in the characterization of enhancing solid renal masses.
        Clin Nucl Med. 2017; 42: e188-e193
        • Campbell SP
        • Tzortzakakis A
        • Javadi MS
        • et al.
        Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the characterization of renal masses: a pictorial guide.
        Br J Radiol. 2018; 9120170526
        • Rowe SP
        • Gorin MA
        • Solnes LB
        • et al.
        Correlation of 99mTc-sestamibi uptake in renal masses with mitochondrial content and multi-drug resistance pump expression.
        EJNMMI Res. 2017; 7: 80
        • Gormley TS
        • Van Every MJ
        • Moreno AJ
        Renal oncocytoma: preoperative diagnosis using technetium 99m sestamibi imaging.
        Urology. 1996; 48: 33-39