Advertisement

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Exchange: An Analysis of 23,000 Hospitalized Patients

Published:February 04, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.017

      Abstract

      Background

      Catheter exchange over a guidewire is frequently performed for malfunctioning peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Whether such exchanges are associated with venous thromboembolism is not known.

      Methods

      We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the association between PICC exchange and risk of thromboembolism. Adult hospitalized patients that received a PICC during clinical care at one of 51 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety consortium were included. The primary outcome was hazard of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (radiographically confirmed upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not.

      Results

      Of 23,010 patients that underwent PICC insertion in the study, 589 patients (2.6%) experienced a PICC exchange. Almost half of all exchanges were performed for catheter dislodgement or occlusion. A total of 480 patients (2.1%) experienced PICC-associated deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was greater in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not (3.6% vs 2.0%, P < .001). Median time to thrombosis was shorter among those that underwent exchange vs those that did not (5 vs 11 days, P = .02). Following adjustment, PICC exchange was independently associated with twofold greater risk of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.85) vs no exchange. The effect size of PICC exchange on thrombosis was second in magnitude to device lumens (HR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.66 and HR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.6-3.33 for double- and triple-lumen devices, respectively).

      Conclusion

      Guidewire exchange of PICCs may be associated with increased risk of thrombosis. As some exchanges may be preventable, consideration of risks and benefits of exchanges in clinical practice is needed.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Greene M.T.
        • Flanders S.A.
        • Woller S.C.
        • Bernstein S.J.
        • Chopra V.
        The association between PICC use and venous thromboembolism in upper and lower extremities.
        Am J Med. 2015; 128 (e1): 986-993
        • Chopra V.
        • Anand S.
        • Hickner A.
        • et al.
        Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Lancet. 2013; 382: 311-325
        • Hoshal Jr, V.L.
        Total intravenous nutrition with peripherally inserted silicone elastomer central venous catheters.
        Arch Surg. 1975; 110: 644-646
        • Chopra V.
        • Kuhn L.
        • Flanders S.A.
        • Saint S.
        • Krein S.L.
        Hospitalist experiences, practice, opinions, and knowledge regarding peripherally inserted central catheters: results of a national survey.
        J Hosp Med. 2013; 8: 635-638
        • Gibson C.
        • Connolly B.L.
        • Moineddin R.
        • Mahant S.
        • Filipescu D.
        • Amaral J.G.
        Peripherally inserted central catheters: use at a tertiary care pediatric center.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24: 1323-1331
        • Pikwer A.
        • Akeson J.
        • Lindgren S.
        Complications associated with peripheral or central routes for central venous cannulation.
        Anaesthesia. 2012; 67: 65-71
        • Song L.
        • Li H.
        Malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter: experience from 3,012 patients with cancer.
        Exp Ther Med. 2013; 6: 891-893
        • McCoy M.
        • Bedwell S.
        • Noori S.
        Exchange of peripherally inserted central catheters is associated with an increased risk for bloodstream infection.
        Am J Perinatol. 2011; 28: 419-424
        • Guttmann D.M.
        • Trerotola S.O.
        • Clark T.W.
        • et al.
        Malfunctioning and infected tunneled infusion catheters: over-the-wire catheter exchange versus catheter removal and replacement.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22 (quiz 646): 642-646
        • Greene M.T.
        • Spyropoulos A.C.
        • Chopra V.
        • et al.
        Validation of risk assessment models of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients.
        Am J Med. 2016; 129: 1001.e9-1001.e18
        • Grant P.J.
        • Greene M.T.
        • Chopra V.
        • Bernstein S.J.
        • Hofer T.P.
        • Flanders S.A.
        Assessing the caprini score for risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients.
        Am J Med. 2016; 129: 528-535
        • Herc E.
        • Patel P.
        • Washer L.L.
        • Conlon A.
        • Flanders S.A.
        • Chopra V.
        A model to PREDICT central-line-associated bloodstream infection among patients with peripherally inserted central catheters: the MPC score.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 1155-1166
        • Quan H.
        • Sundararajan V.
        • Halfon P.
        • et al.
        Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
        Med Care. 2005; 43: 1130-1139
        • Chopra V.
        • Anand S.
        • Krein S.L.
        • Chenoweth C.
        • Saint S.
        Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence.
        Am J Med. 2012; 125: 733-741
        • Chopra V.
        • Ratz D.
        • Kuhn L.
        • Lopus T.
        • Chenoweth C.
        • Krein S.
        PICC-associated bloodstream infections: prevalence, patterns, and predictors.
        Am J Med. 2014; 127: 319-328
        • Pongruangporn M.
        • Ajenjo M.C.
        • Russo A.J.
        • et al.
        Patient- and device-specific risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 184-189
        • Lee E.W.
        • Wei L.J.
        • Amato D.A.
        • Leurgans S.
        Cox-type regression analysis for large numbers of small groups of correlated failure Time observations.
        Surviv Anal. 1992; 211: 237-247
        • Rubin D.
        Multiple imputation in sample surveys-a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1978; 20: 20-34
        • Evans R.S.
        • Sharp J.H.
        • Linford L.H.
        • et al.
        Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters.
        Chest. 2010; 138: 803-810
        • Chopra V.
        • Ratz D.
        • Kuhn L.
        • Lopus T.
        • Lee A.
        • Krein S.
        Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12: 847-854
        • O'Brien J.
        • Paquet F.
        • Lindsay R.
        • Valenti D.
        Insertion of PICCs with minimum number of lumens reduces complications and costs.
        J Am College Radiol. 2013; 10: 864-868
        • Evans R.S.
        • Sharp J.H.
        • Linford L.H.
        • et al.
        Reduction of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated DVT.
        Chest. 2013; 143: 627-633
        • Gnannt R.
        • Patel P.
        • Temple M.
        • et al.
        Peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric patients: to repair or not repair.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40: 845-851
        • Trerotola S.O.
        • Thompson S.
        • Chittams J.
        • Vierregger K.S.
        Analysis of tip malposition and correction in peripherally inserted central catheters placed at bedside by a dedicated nursing team.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18: 513-518
        • Leroyer C.
        • Lasheras A.
        • Marie V.
        • et al.
        Prospective follow-up of complications related to peripherally inserted central catheters.
        Med Mal Infect. 2013; 43: 350-355
        • Zerla P.A.
        • Canelli A.
        • Cerne L.
        • et al.
        Evaluating safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PICC securement by subcutaneously anchored stabilization device.
        J Vasc Access. 2017; 18: 238-242
        • Elen Hughes M.
        Reducing PICC migrations and improving patient outcomes.
        Br J Nurs. 2014; 23 (S14-S18): S12
        • Smith S.N.
        • Moureau N.
        • Vaughn V.M.
        • et al.
        Patterns and predictors of peripherally inserted central catheter occlusion: the 3P-O study.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28 (e2): 749-756
        • Baskin J.L.
        • Pui C.H.
        • Reiss U.
        • et al.
        Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long-term indwelling central venous catheters.
        Lancet. 2009; 374: 159-169
        • Kearon C.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Comerota A.J.
        • et al.
        Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.
        Chest. 2012; 141: e419S-e496S
        • Chopra V.
        • Kuhn L.
        • Coffey Jr, C.E.
        • et al.
        Hospitalist experiences, practice, opinions, and knowledge regarding peripherally inserted central catheters: a Michigan survey.
        J Hosp Med. 2013; 8: 309-314
        • Zakhour R.
        • Chaftari A.M.
        • Raad I.I.
        Catheter-related infections in patients with haematological malignancies: novel preventive and therapeutic strategies.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: e241-e250
        • Chopra V.
        • Flanders S.A.
        • Saint S.
        • et al.
        The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.
        Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163: S1-S40