Advertisement

Early Invasive Versus Initial Conservative Treatment Strategies in Octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI

      Abstract

      Background

      Previous studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). However, there are limited data for patients ≥80 years of age in these studies.

      Methods

      We used the 2003-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients ≥80 years of age (octogenarians) with UA/NSTEMI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare in-hospital outcomes in octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI undergoing early invasive (coronary angiography within 48 hours of admission, with or without revascularization) versus initial conservative treatment.

      Results

      Among 968,542 octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI, 806,902 (83.3%) were managed using an initial conservative approach and 161,640 (16.7%) using an early invasive strategy. Patients in the early invasive group were more likely to be younger, men, white, and had a higher prevalence of smoking, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, known coronary artery disease, carotid artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in octogenarians in the early invasive group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.78). Early invasive strategy was associated with lower rates of acute ischemic stroke (adjusted OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.66), intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.510.70), gastrointestinal bleeding (adjusted OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.65), and shorter average length of stay (5.3 vs 5.8 days, P <.001), but higher cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR 2.14; 95% CI, 2.06-2.23) and total hospital cost (23,584 vs 13,278 USD).

      Conclusion

      Compared with an initial conservative approach, an early invasive strategy in octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and shorter length of stay, but higher cardiogenic shock and total hospital cost.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jneid H.
        • Anderson J.L.
        • Wright R.S.
        • et al.
        2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.
        Circulation. 2012; 126: 875-910
        • Wallentin L.
        • Lagerqvist B.
        • Husted S.
        • Kontny F.
        • Stahle E.
        • Swahn E.
        Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 9-16
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Weintraub W.S.
        • Demopoulos L.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1879-1887
        • Fox K.A.
        • Poole-Wilson P.A.
        • Henderson R.A.
        • et al.
        Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina.
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 743-751
        • Fox K.A.
        • Poole-Wilson P.
        • Clayton T.C.
        • et al.
        5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2005; 366: 914-920
        • Ottervanger J.P.
        • Armstrong P.
        • Barnathan E.S.
        • et al.
        Association of revascularisation with low mortality in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, a report from GUSTO IV-ACS.
        Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 1494-1501
        • Alexander K.P.
        • Newby L.K.
        • Cannon C.P.
        • et al.
        Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
        Circulation. 2007; 115: 2549-2569
        • Jennings S.M.
        • Bennett K.
        • Lonergan M.
        • Shelley E.
        Trends in hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction in Ireland, 1997-2008.
        Heart. 2012; 98: 1285-1289
        • Khera S.
        • Kolte D.
        • Palaniswamy C.
        • et al.
        ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly - Temporal Trends in incidence, utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in the United States.
        Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 6; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.06.021
        • Elixhauser A.
        • Steiner C.
        • Harris D.R.
        • Coffey R.M.
        Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
        Med Care. 1998; 36: 8-27
        • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
        HCUP Comorbidity Software; 1-14-2013.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2013
        • Austin P.C.
        Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research.
        Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2009; 38: 1228-1234
        • Rittger H.
        • Schnupp S.
        • Sinha A.M.
        • et al.
        Predictors of treatment in acute coronary syndromes in the elderly: impact on decision making and clinical outcome after interventional versus conservative treatment.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 80: 735-743
        • Alexander K.P.
        • Roe M.T.
        • Chen A.Y.
        • et al.
        Evolution in cardiovascular care for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1479-1487
        • Bach R.G.
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Weintraub W.S.
        • et al.
        The effect of routine, early invasive management on outcome for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
        Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 186-195
        • Devlin G.
        • Gore J.M.
        • Elliott J.
        • et al.
        Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.
        Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 1275-1282
        • Bauer T.
        • Koeth O.
        • Junger C.
        • et al.
        Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
        Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 2873-2878
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Roe M.T.
        • Peterson E.D.
        • et al.
        Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative.
        JAMA. 2004; 292: 2096-2104
        • de Winter R.J.
        • Windhausen F.
        • Cornel J.H.
        • et al.
        Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1095-1104
        • Swahn E.
        • Alfredsson J.
        • Afzal R.
        • et al.
        Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials.
        Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 51-60
        • O'Donoghue M.
        • Boden W.E.
        • Braunwald E.
        • et al.
        Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
        JAMA. 2008; 300: 71-80