Improving Herpes Zoster Vaccination Rates Through Use of a Clinical Pharmacist and a Personal Health Record



      Preventative health services, including herpes zoster vaccination rates, remain low despite known benefits. A new care model to improve preventative health services is warranted. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the functions of an electronic medical record, in combination with a pharmacist as part of the care team, can improve the herpes zoster vaccination rate.


      This study was a 6-month, randomized controlled trial at a General Internal Medicine clinic at The Ohio State University. The 2589 patients aged 60 years and older without documented herpes zoster vaccination in the electronic medical record were stratified on the basis of activated personal health record status, an online tool used to share health information between patient and provider. Of the 674 personal health record users, 250 were randomized to receive information regarding the herpes zoster vaccination via an electronic message and 424 were randomized to standard of care. Likewise, of the 1915 nonpersonal health record users, 250 were randomized to receive the same information via the US Postal Service and 1665 were randomized to standard of care. After pharmacist chart review, eligible patients were mailed a herpes zoster vaccine prescription. Herpes zoster vaccination rates were compared by chi-square tests.


      Intervention recipients had significantly higher vaccination rates than controls in both personal health record (relative risk, 2.7; P = .0007) and nonpersonal health record (relative risk, 2.9; P = .0001) patient populations.


      Communication outside of face-to-face office visits, by both personal health record electronic message and information by mail, can improve preventative health intervention rates compared with standard care.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • National Commission on Prevention Priorities
        Preventative Care: A National Profile on Use, Disparities, and Health Benefits.
        Partnership for Prevention, Washington, DC2007
        • Hensrud D.D.
        Clinical preventative medicine in primary care: background and practice: 1. Rationale and current preventative practices.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75: 165-172
        • Fiore A.E.
        • Uyeki T.M.
        • Broder K.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011; 60: 1128-1132
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        National Mid-Season Flu Vaccination Coverage: National Flu Survey, United States, 2011-12 Influenza Season.
        US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA2011 (Available at:) (Accessed November 28, 2012)
      1. Prevention of pneumococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997; 46: 1-24
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        2009 Adult Vaccination Coverage, The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
        US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA2009 (Available at:) (Accessed November 28, 2011)
        • Maciosek M.V.
        • Coffield A.B.
        • Edwards N.M.
        • Flottemesch T.J.
        • Goodman M.J.
        • Solberg L.I.
        Priorities among effective clinical preventative services: results of a systematic review and analysis.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 52-61
        • Pollak K.I.
        • Krause K.M.
        • Yarnall K.S.
        • Gradison M.
        • Michener J.L.
        • Ostbye T.
        Estimated time spent on preventative services by primary care physicians.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 245
        • Yarnall K.S.H.
        • Pollak K.I.
        • Ostbye T.
        • Krause K.M.
        • Michener J.L.
        Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?.
        Am J Pub Health. 2003; 93: 635-641
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Prevention of herpes zoster: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008; 57: 1-30
        • Oxman M.N.
        • Levin M.J.
        • Johnson G.R.
        • et al.
        A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2271-2284
        • CDC
        Adult vaccination coverage–United States, 2010.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61: 66-72
        • Aldrich N.
        • Benson W.F.
        CDC Seeks to Protect Older Adults With Shingles Vaccine Message.
        US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA2008 (Available at:) (Accessed October 1, 2010)
        • Hurley L.P.
        • Lindley M.C.
        • Harpaz R.
        • et al.
        Barriers to the use of herpes zoster vaccine.
        Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 555-560
        • Lu P.J.
        • Euler G.L.
        • Jumaan A.O.
        • Harpaz R.
        Herpes zoster vaccination among adults aged 60 years or older in the United States, 2007: uptake of the first new vaccine to target seniors.
        Vaccine. 2009; 27: 882-887
        • Blumenthal D.
        Stimulating the adoption of health information technology.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1477-1479
        • Romano M.J.
        • Stafford R.S.
        Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.
        Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 897-903
        • Hillestad R.
        • Bigelow J.
        • Bower A.
        • et al.
        Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? potential health benefits, savings, and costs.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24: 1103-1117
        • Young J.
        • Eley D.
        • Fahey P.
        • Patterson E.
        • Hegney D.
        Enabling research in general practice: increasing functionality of electronic medical records.
        Aust Fam Physician. 2010; 39: 506-509
        • Wagner E.H.
        Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?.
        Eff Clin Pract. 1998; 1: 2-4
      2. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Patient-centered medical home standards and guidelines: 2011. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2012.

        • Abrons J.P.
        • Smith M.
        Patient-centered medical homes: primer for pharmacists.
        J Am Pharm Assoc. 2011; 51: e38-e48
        • Zellmer W.A.
        The future of health-system pharmacy: opportunities and challenges in practice model change.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2012; 46: S41-S45
        • Hoffman R.M.
        • Steel S.R.
        • Yee E.F.
        • et al.
        A system-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake.
        Am J Manag Care. 2011; 17: 49-55