Diagnostic Value of Chest Radiographs in Bedridden Patients Suspected of Having Pneumonia



      To assess the diagnostic value of the chest radiograph for the diagnosis of pneumonia in bedridden patients, using non-contrast-enhanced high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard.


      We prospectively evaluated bedridden patients hospitalized with moderate to high clinical probability of pneumonia. Chest radiographs were interpreted in a blinded fashion by 3 observers and classified as definite, normal, or uncertain for pneumonia. Chest CT was obtained within 12 hours of chest radiograph. We applied Bayesian analysis to assess the accuracy of chest radiograph in the diagnosis of pneumonia.


      In a 5-month period, 58 patients were evaluated, 31 (53%) were female. Their chest radiographs were interpreted as negative, uncertain, or positive for pneumonia in 31 (53%), 15 (26%), and 12 (21%) patients, respectively, while CT confirmed pneumonia in 11 (35%), 10 (67%), and in 10 (83%). The sensitivity of the chest radiograph to diagnose pneumonia was 65%, the specificity was 93%, the positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 83% and 65%, while the overall accuracy was 69% (95% confidence interval, 50%-79%).


      In bedridden patients with suspected pneumonia, a normal chest radiograph does not rule out the diagnosis, hence, a chest CT scan might provide valuable diagnostic information.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Marrie T.J.
        in: Hazzard W.R. Blass J.P. Halter J.B. Ouslander J.G. Tinetti M.E. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York2003: 1083-1097
        • Hackerling P.S.
        • Tape T.G.
        • Wingston R.S.
        • et al.
        Clinical prediction rule for pulmonary infiltrates.
        Ann Intern Med. 1990; 113: 664-670
        • Rothrock S.G.
        • Green S.M.
        • Costanzo K.A.
        • et al.
        High yield criteria for obtaining non-trauma chest radiography in the adult emergency department population.
        J Emerg Med. 2002; 23: 117-124
        • Basi S.K.
        • Marrie T.J.
        • Huang J.Q.
        • Majumdar S.R.
        Patients admitted to hospital with suspected pneumonia and normal chest radiography.
        Am J Med. 2004; 117: 305-311
        • Loeb M.B.
        • Carusone S.B.
        • Marrie T.J.
        • et al.
        Interobserver reliability of radiologists' interpretations of mobile chest radiographs for nursing home-acquired pneumonia.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006; 7: 416-419
        • Tanaka N.
        • Matsumoto T.
        • Kuramitsu T.
        • et al.
        High resolution CT findings in community-acquired pneumonia.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996; 20: 600-608
        • Le Blanche A.F.
        • Bazot M.
        • Frey I.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a new hands-up ergonomics for chest radiography in geriatric patients.
        Invest Radiol. 2002; 37: 35-39
        • Syrjälä H.
        • Broas M.
        • Suramo I.
        • et al.
        High resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia.
        Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27: 358-363
        • Wipf J.E.
        • Lipsky B.A.
        • Hirschmann J.V.
        • et al.
        Diagnosing pneumonia by physical examination.
        Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159: 1082-1087
        • Mayo J.R.
        • Aldrich J.
        • Muller N.L.
        Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society.
        Radiology. 2003; 228: 15-21

      Linked Article