Advertisement

Fibrate/Statin Initiation in Warfarin Users and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To evaluate whether initiation of a fibrate or statin increases the risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarin users.

      Methods

      We used Medicaid claims data (1999-2003) to perform an observational case-control study nested within person-time exposed to warfarin in those ≥18 years (n=353,489). Gastrointestinal bleeding cases were matched to 50 controls based on index date and state.

      Results

      Chronic warfarin users had an increased odds ratio of gastrointestinal bleeding upon initiation of gemfibrozil (1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-3.54] for the first prescription; 1.75; 95% CI, 0.77-3.95 for the second prescription); simvastatin (1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.07 for the first prescription; 1.60; 95% CI, 1.07-2.39 for the second prescription); or atorvastatin (1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.81 for the first prescription; 1.05; 95% CI, 0.73-1.52 for the second prescription). In contrast, no increased risk was found with pravastatin initiation (0.75; 95% CI, 0.39-1.46 for the first prescription; 0.90; 95% CI, 0.43-1.91 for the second prescription).

      Conclusions

      Initiation of a fibrate or statin that inhibits CYP3A4 enzymes, including atorvastatin, was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding. Initiation of pravastatin, which is mainly excreted unchanged, was not associated with an increased risk.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wysowski D.K.
        • Nourjah P.
        • Swartz L.
        Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action.
        Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1414-1419
        • Holbrook A.M.
        • Pereira J.A.
        • Labiris R.
        • et al.
        Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions.
        Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 1095-1106
        • Douketis J.D.
        • Arneklev K.
        • Goldhaber S.Z.
        • et al.
        Comparison of bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with ximelagatran or warfarin: assessment of incidence, case-fatality rate, time course and sites of bleeding, and risk factors for bleeding.
        Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 853-859
        • Sakaeda T.
        • Fujino H.
        • Komoto C.
        • et al.
        Effects of acid and lactone forms of eight HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on CYP-mediated metabolism and MDR1-mediated transport.
        Pharm Res. 2006; 23: 506-512
        • Wittkowsky A.K.
        • Boccuzzi S.J.
        • Wogen J.
        • et al.
        Frequency of concurrent use of warfarin with potentially interacting drugs.
        Pharmacotherapy. 2004; 24: 1668-1674
        • Hickmott H.
        • Wynne H.
        • Kamali F.
        The effect of simvastatin co-medication on warfarin anticoagulation response and dose requirements.
        Thromb Haemost. 2003; 89: 949-950
        • MICROMEDEX
        (Accessed August 10, 2007)
        • Wolters Kluwer Health
        Drug Facts & Comparisons 4.0.
        (Accessed July 7, 2007)
        • Miller D.B.
        • Spence J.D.
        Clinical pharmacokinetics of fibric acid derivatives (fibrates).
        Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998; 34: 155-162
        • Stern R.
        • Abel R.
        • Gibson G.L.
        • Besserer J.
        Atorvastatin does not alter the anticoagulant activity of warfarin.
        J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 37: 1062-1064
        • Haber L.T.
        • Maier A.
        • Gentry P.R.
        • et al.
        Genetic polymorphisms in assessing interindividual variability in delivered dose.
        Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002; 35: 177-197
        • Ahmad S.
        Gemfibrozil interaction with warfarin sodium (coumadin).
        Chest. 1990; 98: 1041-1042
        • Trilli L.E.
        • Kelley C.L.
        • Aspinall S.L.
        • Kroner B.A.
        Potential interaction between warfarin and fluvastatin.
        Ann Pharmacother. 1996; 30: 1399-1402
        • Kline S.S.
        • Harrell C.C.
        Potential warfarin-fluvastatin interaction.
        Ann Pharmacother. 1997; 31: 790
        • Rindone J.P.
        • Keng H.C.
        Gemfibrozil-warfarin drug interaction resulting in profound hypoprothrombinemia.
        Chest. 1998; 114: 641-642
        • Andrus M.R.
        Oral anticoagulant drug interactions with statins: case report of fluvastatin and review of the literature.
        Pharmacotherapy. 2004; 24: 285-290
        • Mann D.
        • Reynolds K.
        • Smith D.
        • Muntner P.
        Trends in statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels among US adults: impact of the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42: 1208-1215
        • Hennessy S.
        • Carson J.L.
        • Ray W.A.
        • Strom B.L.
        Medicaid databases.
        in: Strom B.L. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Chichester, UK2005: 281-294
        • MedPac: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Report to the Congress: New Approaches in Medicare.
        Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington, DC2004
        • Hennessy S.
        • Leonard C.E.
        • Palumbo C.M.
        • et al.
        Quality of Medicaid and Medicare data obtained through Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
        Med Care. 2007; 45: 1216-1220
        • Witt D.M.
        • Sadler M.A.
        • Shanahan R.L.
        • et al.
        Effect of a centralized clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service on the outcomes of anticoagulation therapy.
        Chest. 2005; 127: 1515-1522
        • West S.L.
        • Strom B.L.
        • Poole C.
        Validity of pharmacoepidemiologic drug and diagnosis data.
        in: Strom B.L. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Chichester, UK2005: 709-766
        • Flanders W.D.
        • Louv W.C.
        The exposure odds ratio in nested case-control studies with competing risks.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 124: 684-692
        • Tournier M.
        • Moride Y.
        • Lesk M.
        • et al.
        The depletion of susceptibles effect in the assessment of burden-of-illness: the example of age-related macular degeneration in the community-dwelling elderly population of Quebec.
        Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 15: e22-e35
        • Mickey R.M.
        • Greenland S.
        The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 125-137
        • Jacobson T.A.
        Comparative pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin when coadministered with cytochrome P450 inhibitors.
        Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94: 1140-1146
        • Neuvonen P.J.
        • Niemi M.
        • Backman J.T.
        Drug interactions with lipid-lowering drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance.
        Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 80: 565-581