Advertisement
Review| Volume 119, ISSUE 3, P203-216, March 2006

Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The study’s purpose was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease.

      Subjects and methods

      A search of the literature in all languages was performed incorporating both electronic and manual components. Manual reference checks of recent reviews and all original investigations supplemented the electronic searches.

      Results

      Average sensitivity for patient-based detection of significant (>50% or ≥50%) stenosis was 61 of 64 (95%) with 4-slice CT, 276 of 292 (95%) with 16-slice CT, and 47 of 47 (100%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 84% for 4-slice CT, 84% for 16-slice CT, and 100% for 64-slice CT. The sensitivity for a significant stenosis in evaluable segments was 307 of 372 (83%) with 4-slice CT, 1023 of 1160 (88%) with 16-slice CT, and 165 of 176 (94%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 93% or greater with all multidetector CT. Seventy-eight percent of segments were evaluable with 4-slice CT, 91% with 16-slice CT, and 100% with 64-slice CT. Stenoses in proximal and mid-segments were shown with a higher sensitivity than distal segments. Left main stenosis was identified with high sensitivity with all multidetector CT, but sensitivity in other vessels increased with an increasing number of detectors.

      Conclusion

      Multidetector CT has the potential to be used as a screening test in appropriate patients. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT seems to be reasonably sensitive and specific for the detection of significant coronary artery disease but has shortcomings. Preliminary data with 64-slice CT suggest that it is more sensitive and specific.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Dowe DA. The current status and future of coronary CT Angiography. Consultations in computed tomography. Available at: www.mhsource.com/mrp. Accessed December 9, 2004

        • Achenbach S.
        • Daniel W.G.
        Noninvasive coronary angiography-an acceptable alternative?.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1909-1910
        • Kennedy R.H.
        • Kennedy M.A.
        • Frye R.L.
        • et al.
        Cardiac-catheterization and cardiac-surgical facilities.
        N Engl J Med. 1982; 307: 986-993
        • Johnson L.W.
        • Lozner E.C.
        • Johnson S.
        • et al.
        Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989; 17: 5-10
      2. AHA Hospital Statistics, 2006 Edition. American Hospital Association, Chicago2006 (xiv,6,158,161)
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • et al.
        The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: W1-W12
        • Lijmer J.G.
        • Mol B.W.
        • Heisterkamp S.
        • et al.
        Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 1061-1066
        • Cook D.J.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • Haynes R.B.
        Systematic reviews.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 376-380
        • Austen W.G.
        • Edwards J.E.
        • Frye R.L.
        • et al.
        A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 1975; 51: 5-40
        • Gaudio C.
        • Mirabelli F.
        • Alessandra B.L.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenoses by multidetector-row spiral computed tomography; comparison with conventional angiography.
        Eur Rev Med Pharm Sci. 2005; 9: 13-21
        • Leber A.W.
        • Knez A.
        • Becker C.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography.
        Heart. 2003; 89: 633-639
        • Nieman K.
        • Rensing B.J.
        • van Geuns R.J.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease.
        Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 913-918
        • Nieman K.
        • Oudkerk M.
        • Rensing B.J.
        • et al.
        Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 599-603
        • Sato Y.
        • Matsumoto N.
        • Kato M.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by multislice spiral computed tomography using a new retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction technique.
        Circ J. 2003; 67: 401-405
        • Dirksen M.S.
        • Jukema J.W.
        • Bax J.J.
        • et al.
        Cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with unstable angina.
        Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 457-461
        • Becker C.R.
        • Knez A.
        • Leber A.
        • et al.
        Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002; 26: 750-755
        • Herzog C.
        • Ay M.
        • Engelmann K.
        • et al.
        Visualization techniques in multislice CT-coronary angiography of the heart. Correlations of axial, multiplanar, three-dimensional and virtual endoscopic imaging with the invasive diagnosis.
        Rofo. 2001; 173: 341-349
        • Giesler T.
        • Baum U.
        • Ropers D.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 911-916
        • Kopp A.F.
        • Schroeder S.
        • Kuettner A.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients.
        Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 1714-1725
        • Morgan-Hughes G.J.
        • Marshall A.J.
        • Roobottom C.A.
        Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography.
        Clin Radiol. 2003; 58: 378-383
        • Maruyama T.
        • Yoshizumi T.
        • Tamura R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography.
        Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93: 537-542
        • Matsuo S.
        • Nakamura Y.
        • Matsumoto T.
        • et al.
        Visual assessment of coronary artery stenosis with electrocardiographically-gated multislice computed tomography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004; 20: 67-69
        • Hoffmann M.H.K.
        • Shi H.
        • Schmitz B.L.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography.
        J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293: 2471-2478
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Moselewski F.
        • Cury R.C.
        • et al.
        Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 2638-2643
        • Nieman K.
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Lemos P.A.
        • Raaijmakers R.
        • Pattynama P.M.
        • de Feyter P.J.
        Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography.
        Circulation. 2002; 106: 2051-2054
        • Kuettner A.
        • Beck T.
        • Drosch T.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 123-127
        • Martuscelli E.
        • Romagnoli A.
        • D’Eliseo A.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses.
        Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 1043-1048
        • Ropers D.
        • Baum U.
        • Pohle K.
        • et al.
        Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.
        Circulation. 2003; 107: 664-666
        • Zhang Z.H.
        • Jin Z.Y.
        • Li D.J.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive imaging of coronary artery with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
        Chin Med Sci J. 2004; 19: 174-179
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Runza G.
        • Marano R.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments.
        Radiol Med. 2005; 109 (Torino): 91-97
        • Moon J.Y.
        • Chung N.
        • Choi B.W.
        • et al.
        The utility of multi-detector row spiral CT for detection of coronary artery stenoses.
        Yonsei Med J. 2005; 46: 86-94
        • Paul J.F.
        • Ohanessian A.
        • Caussin C.
        • et al.
        Visualization of coronary tree and detection of coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice, sub-millimeter computed tomography.
        Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004; 97: 31-36
        • Schuijf J.D.
        • Bax J.J.
        • Salm L.P.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography.
        Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 571-574
        • Mollet N.R.
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Krestin G.P.
        • et al.
        Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 128-132
        • Mollet N.R.
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Nieman K.
        • et al.
        Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 2265-2270
        • Kuettner A.
        • Trabold T.
        • Schroeder S.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1230-1237
        • Leta R.
        • Carreras F.
        • Alomar X.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16 multidetector-row spiral computed tomography.
        Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004; 57: 217-224
        • Martuscelli E.
        • Razzini C.
        • D’Eliseo A.
        • Marchei M.
        • Pisani E.
        • Romeo F.
        Limitations of four-slice multirow detector computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenosis.
        Ital Heart J. 2004; 5: 127-131
        • Achenbach S.
        • Giesler T.
        • Ropers D.
        • et al.
        Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography.
        Circulation. 2001; 103: 2535-2538
        • Knez A.
        • Becker C.R.
        • Leber A.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses.
        Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 1191-1194
        • Mennicke M.
        • Giesler T.
        • Ropers D.
        • et al.
        Influence of heart rate on image quality and detection of coronary stenoses with multislice spiral CT.
        Biomed Tech. 2002; 47 (Berl): 782-785
        • Leschka S.
        • Alkadhi H.
        • Plass A.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology.
        Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1482-1487
        • Jaeschke R.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Sackett D.L.
        • The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
        Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1994; 271: 703-707
        • Herzog C.
        • Abolmaali N.
        • Balzer J.O.
        • et al.
        Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT.
        Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 2670-2678
        • Becker C.R.
        • Knez A.
        • Ohnesorge B.
        • Schoepf U.J.
        • Reiser M.F.
        Imaging of noncalcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175: 423-424
        • Kopp A.F.
        • Schroeder S.
        • Baumbach A.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive characterization of coronary lesion morphology and composition by multislice CT.
        Eur Radiol. 2001; 11: 1607-1611
        • Schroeder S.
        • Kopp A.F.
        • Baumbach A.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1430-1435
        • Achenbach S.
        • Daniel W.G.
        Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis using computed tomography.
        Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004; 6: 213-218
        • De Feyter P.J.
        • Nieman K.
        Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. An emerging clinical modality.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1238-1240
      3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, HCUPnet, www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup. Accessed January 19, 2006.

        • Garcia M.J.
        Noninvasive coronary angiography. Hype or new paradigm?.
        J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293: 2531-2533
        • Schroeder S.
        • Kopp A.F.
        • Kuettner A.
        • et al.
        Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography.
        Clin Imaging. 2002; 26: 106-111
      4. Application Guide. Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Forchheim2004
        • Hunold P.
        • Vogt F.M.
        • Schmermund A.
        • et al.
        Radiation exposure during cardiac CT.
        Radiology. 2003; 226: 145-152
      5. Annals of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP). Available at: http://www.icrp.org/docs/Summary_B-scan_ICRP_60_Ann_ICRP_1990_Recs.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2006.

        • Crean A.
        • Dutka D.
        • Coulden R.
        Cardiac imaging using nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 2004; 42: 619-634
        • Tardif J.C.
        • Vannan M.A.
        • Taylor K.
        • Schwartz S.L.
        • Pandian N.G.
        Delineation of extended lengths of coronary arteries by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 909-919
        • Caiati C.
        • Montaldo C.
        • Zedda N.
        • Bina A.
        • Iliceto S.
        New noninvasive method for coronary flow reserve assessment.
        Circulation. 1999; 99: 771-778
        • Dix W.R.
        • Kupper W.
        • Dill T.
        • et al.
        Comparison of intravenous coronary angiography using synchrotron radiation with selective coronary angiography.
        J Synchrotron Radiat. 2003; 10: 219-227
        • Achenbach S.
        • Moshage W.
        • Ropers D.
        • Nossen J.
        • Daniel W.G.
        Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1964-1971
        • Schmermund A.
        • Rensing B.J.
        • Sheedy P.F.
        • Bell M.R.
        • Rumberger J.A.
        Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1547-1554
        • Budoff M.J.
        • Oudiz R.J.
        • Zalace C.P.
        • et al.
        Intravenous three-dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography.
        Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 840-845
        • Manning W.J.
        • Li W.
        • Edelman R.R.
        A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 828-832
        • Stuber M.
        • Botnar R.M.
        • Kissinger K.V.
        • Manning W.J.
        Free-breathing black-blood coronary MR angiography.
        Radiology. 2001; 219: 278-283
        • Regenfus M.
        • Ropers D.
        • Achenbach S.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 44-50
        • van Geuns R.J.
        • Wielopolski P.A.
        • de Bruin H.G.
        • et al.
        MR coronary angiography with breath-hold targeted volumes.
        Radiology. 2000; 217: 270-277
        • Ikonen A.E.
        • Manninen H.I.
        • Vainio P.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional respiratory-gated coronary MR angiography with reference to X-ray coronary angiography.
        Acta Radiol. 2003; 44: 583-589
        • Kim W.Y.
        • Danias P.G.
        • Stuber M.
        • et al.
        Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1863-1869
        • Kaandorp T.A.M.
        • Lamb H.J.
        • Bax J.J.
        • van der Wall E.E.
        • de Roos A.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary arteries, the ischemic cascade, and myocardial infarction.
        Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 200-208
        • White R.D.
        • Breen J.F.
        Current and future clinical applications of contrast-enhanced cardiac CT.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001; 17: 477-478
        • Achenbach S.
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Ferencik M.
        • Wicky S.
        • Brady T.J.
        Tomographic coronary angiography by EBCT and MDCT.
        Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2003; 46: 185-195
        • Kondos G.T.
        • Hoff J.A.
        • Sevrukov A.
        • et al.
        Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events.
        Circulation. 2003; 107: 2571-2576
        • Shaw L.J.
        • Raggi P.
        • Schisterman E.
        • Berman D.S.
        • Callister T.Q.
        Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality.
        Radiology. 2003; 228: 826-833