Advertisement
Clinical research study| Volume 118, ISSUE 5, P536-543, May 2005

Download started.

Ok

A comparison of two hospitalist models with traditional care in a community teaching hospital

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Many studies have documented significant length of stay reduction and cost savings when hospitalist care is compared with traditional care. However, less is known about the concurrent performance of more than one hospitalist model in a single site.

      Subjects and methods

      This retrospective cohort study of 10 595 patients was conducted between July 2001 and June 2002 in a tertiary care community-based teaching hospital. Risk-adjusted length of stay, variable costs, 30-day readmission rates, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality were measured for patients treated by Community Physicians, Private Hospitalists and Academic Hospitalists.

      Results

      There was a 20% reduction in length of stay on the Academic Hospitalist service (p <.0001) and 8% on the Private Hospitalist service (P = .049) compared with Community Physicians. Similarly, total costs were 10% less on the Academic (P <.0001) and 6% less on the Private Hospitalist (P = .02) services compared with Community Physicians. The length of stay of Academic Hospitalists was 13% shorter than that of Private Hospitalists (P = .002); differences in costs between hospitalist groups were not statistically significant. Differences in in-hospital and 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rates among the 3 physician groups were also not statistically significant.

      Conclusions

      The impact on patient outcomes and resource utilization may vary with the hospitalist model used. Future studies should examine the specific organizational characteristics of hospitalists that contribute to improved patient care and resource utilization.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wachter R.M.
        • Goldman L.
        The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American health care system.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 514-517
        • Wachter R.M.
        • Katz P.
        • Showstack J.
        • Bindman A.B.
        • Goldman L.
        Reorganizing an academic medical service.
        JAMA. 1998; 279: 1560-1565
        • Wachter R.M.
        An introduction to the hospitalist model.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 338-342
        • Wachter R.M.
        The evolution of the hospitalist model in the United States.
        Med Clin North Am. 2002; 86: 687-706
        • Wachter R.M.
        • Goldman L.
        The hospitalist movement 5 years later.
        JAMA. 2002; 287: 487-494
        • Auerbach A.D.
        • Wachter R.M.
        • Katz P.
        • Showstack J.
        • Baron R.B.
        • Goldman L.
        Implementation of a voluntary hospitalist service at a community teaching hospital.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 859-865
        • Davis K.M.
        • Koch K.
        • Harvey J.K.
        • Wilson R.
        • Englert J.
        • Gerard P.D.
        Effects of hospitalists on cost, outcomes, and patient satisfaction in a rural health system.
        Am J Med. 2000; 108: 621-626
        • Meltzer D.
        • Manning W.G.
        • Morrison J.
        • et al.
        Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medicine service.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 866-874
        • Lindenauer P.K.
        • Chehabeddine R.
        • Pekow P.
        • Fitzgerald J.
        • Benjamin E.M.
        Quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure.
        Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 1251-1256
        • Molinari C.
        • Short R.
        Effects of an HMO hospitalist program on inpatient utilization.
        Am J Manag Care. 2001; 7: 1051-1057
        • Diamond H.S.
        • Goldberg E.
        • Janosky J.
        The effect of full-time faculty hospitalists on the efficiency of care at a community teaching hospital.
        Ann Intern Med. 1998; 129: 197-203
        • Craig D.
        • Hartka L.
        • Likosky W.H.
        • et al.
        Implementation of a hospitalist system in a large health maintenance organization.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 355-359
        • Tingle L.E.
        • Lambert C.T.
        Comparison of a family practice teaching service and a hospitalist model.
        Fam Med. 2001; 33: 511-515
        • Halpert A.P.
        • Pearson S.D.
        • LeWine H.E.
        • McKean S.C.W.
        The impact of an inpatient physician program on quality, utilization, and satisfaction.
        Am J Manag Care. 2000; 6: 549-555
        • Smith P.C.
        • Westfall J.M.
        • Nicholas R.A.
        Primary care family physicians and 2 hospitalist models.
        J Fam Pract. 2002; 51: 1021-1027
        • Lindenauer P.K.
        • Pantilat S.Z.
        • Katz P.P.
        • Wachter R.M.
        Hospitalists and the practice of inpatient medicine.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 343-349
        • National Association of Inpatient Physicians
        Definition of a hospitalist (editorial).
        Hospitalist. 2000; 4: 3
        • Yeh M.M.
        • Cahill D.F.
        Quantifying physician teaching productivity using clinical relative value units.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14: 617-621
        • Gonella J.S.
        • Hornbrook M.C.
        • Louis D.Z.
        Staging of disease.
        JAMA. 1984; 251: 637-644
        • Iezzoni L.I.
        • Ash A.S.
        • Shwartz M.
        • et al.
        Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured.
        Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123: 763-770