Advertisement

A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope

      Abstract

      Background

      The initial management of syncope or presyncope typically involves short-term cardiac monitoring using a Holter monitor. A loop recorder is used to extend the period of monitoring to increase the probability of obtaining a symptom-rhythm correlation. Loop recorders and Holter monitors are both used commonly, but their utility has not been compared prospectively.

      Methods

      Patients with syncope or presyncope referred for a Holter monitor or a loop recorder were assigned randomly to receive either a 48-hour Holter monitor or a loop recorder for 1 month as an initial diagnostic strategy. If the initial strategy was unsuccessful, patients were offered crossover to the alternate strategy.

      Results

      One hundred patients (mean [± SD] age, 56 ± 20 years; 44 women) with syncope (n = 21), presyncope (n = 29), or both (n = 50) were enrolled. Of the 49 patients assigned randomly to an external loop recorder first, 31 (63%) had an arrhythmia identified or excluded, versus 12 (24%) of 51 patients assigned to a Holter monitor initially (P <0.0001). Arrhythmia was identified as a cause of syncope in 1 patient with a loop recorder, compared with no patients with a Holter monitor (P = 0.31). Of the 29 patients with negative results with Holter monitoring who went on to receive a loop recorder, 13 (45%) had arrhythmia excluded, compared with none of the 4 patients who crossed over to receive a Holter monitor. The overall probability of obtaining a symptom-rhythm correlation was 56% (44/78) for loop recorders versus 22% (12/55) for Holter monitors (P <0.0001). Despite patient education and test transmissions, 13 (23%) of 57 patients who had recurrence of their symptoms failed to activate their loop recorder properly.

      Conclusion

      Loop recorders have a much higher diagnostic yield for patients with syncope or presyncope as compared with Holter monitors. The utility of loop recorders is limited by some patients’ inability to operate them correctly.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kapoor W.N.
        Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 1990; 69: 160-175
        • Kapoor W.N.
        Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope.
        JAMA. 1992; 268: 2553-2560
        • Sarasin F.P.
        • Louis-Simonet M.
        • Carballo D.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope.
        Am J Med. 2001; 111: 177-184
        • Linzer M.
        • Yang E.H.
        • Estes N.A.
        • et al.
        Diagnosing syncope. Part 2.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 76-86
        • Bass E.B.
        • Curtiss E.I.
        • Arena V.C.
        • et al.
        The duration of Holter monitoring in patients with syncope. Is 24 hours enough?.
        Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150: 1073-1078
        • Kapoor W.N.
        • Cha R.
        • Peterson J.R.
        • et al.
        Prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with syncope. Importance of frequent or repetitive ventricular ectopy.
        Am J Med. 1987; 82: 20-28
        • Gibson T.C.
        • Heitzman M.R.
        Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope.
        Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53: 1013-1017
        • Kala R.
        • Viitasalo M.T.
        • Toivonen L.
        • Eisalo A.
        Ambulatory ECG recording in patients referred because of syncope or dizziness.
        Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1982; 668: 13-19
        • Zeldis S.M.
        • Levine B.J.
        • Michelson E.L.
        • Morganroth J.
        Cardiovascular complaints. Correlation with cardiac arrhythmias on 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring.
        Chest. 1980; 78: 456-461
        • Clark P.I.
        • Glasser S.P.
        • Spoto E.
        Arrhythmias detected by ambulatory monitoring. Lack of correlation with symptoms of dizziness and syncope.
        Chest. 1980; 77: 722-725
        • Boudoulas H.
        • Schaal S.F.
        • Lewis R.P.
        • Robinson J.L.
        Superiority of 24-hour outpatient monitoring over multi-stage exercise testing for the evaluation of syncope.
        J Electrocardiol. 1979; 12: 103-108
        • Jonas S.
        • Klein I.
        • Dimant J.
        Importance of Holter monitoring in patients with periodic cerebral symptoms.
        Ann Neurol. 1977; 1: 470-474
        • Linzer M.
        • Pritchett E.L.
        • Pontinen M.
        • et al.
        Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope.
        Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 214-219
        • Cumbee S.R.
        • Pryor R.E.
        • Linzer M.
        Cardiac loop ECG recording.
        South Med J. 1990; 83: 39-43
        • Brown A.P.
        • Dawkins K.D.
        • Davies J.G.
        Detection of arrhythmias.
        Br Heart J. 1987; 58: 251-253
        • Zimetbaum P.
        • Kim K.Y.
        • Ho K.K.
        • et al.
        Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in general clinical practice.
        Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79: 371-372
        • Zimetbaum P.J.
        • Kim K.Y.
        • Josephson M.E.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128: 890-895
        • Krahn A.D.
        • Klein G.J.
        • Yee R.
        • Skanes A.C.
        Randomized assessment of syncope trial.
        Circulation. 2001; 104: 46-51
        • Krahn A.D.
        • Klein G.J.
        • Yee R.
        • et al.
        Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators.
        Circulation. 1999; 99: 406-410
        • Krahn A.D.
        • Klein G.J.
        • Yee R.
        • Norris C.
        Final results from a pilot study with an implantable loop recorder to determine the etiology of syncope in patients with negative noninvasive and invasive testing.
        Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 117-119