Advertisement

Defining the Ideal Qualities of Mentorship: A Qualitative Analysis of the Characteristics of Outstanding Mentors

      Abstract

      Objective

      The study's objective was to identify the important qualities of outstanding mentors as described by their mentees' letters of nomination for a prestigious lifetime achievement award in mentorship.

      Methods

      The Lifetime Achievement in Mentorship Award at the University of California, San Francisco, recognizes a faculty member who has demonstrated sustained mentoring excellence in the academic health sciences. Recommendation letters in support of the top 10 nominees in 2008 (n=53 letters) were analyzed using grounded theory and constant comparative technique until thematic saturation was achieved.

      Results

      In 2008, 29 faculty members (of>1000 eligible senior faculty) were nominated. Nominees were 53 to 78 years old, and 30% were women. The nominees represented 4 schools (Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy and Dentistry) and 22 departments/divisions. Five themes emerged from the analysis. Outstanding mentors: 1) exhibit admirable personal qualitites, including enthusiasm, compassion, and selflessness; 2) act as a career guide, offering a vision but purposefully tailoring support to each mentee; 3) make strong time commitments with regular, frequent, and high-quality meetings; 4) support personal/professional balance; and 5) leave a legacy of how to be a good mentor through role modeling and instituting policies that set global expectations and standards for mentorship.

      Conclusion

      This is the first study to describe the qualities of admired mentors by analyzing nomination letters for a prestigious mentoring award. Our results give new insight into how mentors foster the careers of junior faculty in the academic health sciences. The results can guide academic leaders on how to train and evaluate mentors.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beasley B.W.
        • Simon S.D.
        • Wright S.M.
        A time to be promoted.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 123-129
        • Emans S.J.
        • Goldberg C.T.
        • Milstein M.E.
        • Dobriner J.
        Creating a faculty development office in an academic pediatric hospital: challenges and successes.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: 390-401
        • Kosoko-Lasaki O.
        • Sonnino R.E.
        • Voytko M.L.
        Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 2006; 98: 1449-1459
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marusic A.
        Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 1103-1115
        • Barker E.R.
        Mentoring—a complex relationship.
        J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006; 18: 56-61
        • Rabatin J.S.
        • Lipkin Jr, M.
        • Rubin A.S.
        • Schachter A.
        • Nathan M.
        • Kalet A.
        A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of fifteen hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 569-573
        • Thorndyke L.E.
        • Gusic M.E.
        • George J.H.
        • Quillen D.A.
        • Milner R.J.
        Empowering junior faculty: Penn State's faculty development and mentoring program.
        Acad Med. 2006; 81: 668-673
        • Chew L.D.
        • Watanabe J.M.
        • Buchwald D.
        • Lessler D.S.
        Junior faculty's perspectives on mentoring.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: 652
        • Ramanan R.A.
        • Taylor W.C.
        • Davis R.B.
        • Phillips R.S.
        Mentoring matters.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 340-345
        • Steiner J.F.
        • Lanphear B.P.
        • Curtis P.
        • Vu K.O.
        Indicators of early research productivity among primary care fellows.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 854-860
        • Palepu A.
        • Friedman R.H.
        • Barnett R.C.
        • et al.
        Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools.
        Acad Med. 1998; 73: 318-323
        • Zeind C.S.
        • Zdanowicz M.
        • MacDonald K.
        • Parkhurst C.
        • King C.
        • Wizwer P.
        Developing a sustainable faculty mentoring program.
        Am J Pharm Educ. 2005; 69: 100-106
        • Wingard D.L.
        • Garman K.A.
        • Reznik V.
        Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine.
        Acad Med. 2004; 79: S9-S11
        • Tracy E.E.
        • Jagsi R.
        • Starr R.
        • Tarbell N.J.
        Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 1846-1850
        • Morzinski J.A.
        • Diehr S.
        • Bower D.J.
        • Simpson D.E.
        A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty.
        Fam Med. 1996; 28: 434-438
        • Feldman M.D.
        • Arean P.A.
        • Marshall S.J.
        • Lovett M.
        • O'Sullivan P.O.
        Does mentoring matter?.
        Med Educ Online. 2010 Apr 23; 15https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063
        • Ramanan R.A.
        • Phillips R.S.
        • Davis R.B.
        • Silen W.
        • Reede J.Y.
        Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction.
        Am J Med. 2002; 112: 336-341
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marusic A.
        A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. 2009.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 25: 72-78
        • Strauss A.
        • Corbin J.
        Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA1998
        • Duda R.B.
        Mentorship in academic medicine: a critical component for all faculty and academic advancement.
        Curr Surg. 2004; 61: 325-327
        • Johnson J.C.
        • Williams B.
        • Jayadevappa R.
        Mentoring program for minority faculty at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
        Acad Med. 1999; 74: 376-379
        • Koopman R.J.
        • Thiedke C.C.
        Views of family medicine department chairs about mentoring junior faculty.
        Med Teach. 2005; 27: 734-737
        • Schrubbe K.F.
        Mentorship: a critical component for professional growth and academic success.
        J Dent Educ. 2004; 68: 324-328
        • Allen T.D.
        • Eby L.T.
        • Lentz E.
        Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: closing the gap between research and practice.
        J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91: 567-578