Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 88, ISSUE 6, SUPPLEMENT 1, S15-S19, June 20, 1990

Download started.

Ok

Comparative efficacy of loperamide hydrocholoride and bismuth subsalicylate in the management of acute diarrhea

  • Herberg L. Dupont
    Correspondence
    Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Herbert L. DuPont, Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1.728 Freeman Building, 6431 Fannin, Houston, Texas 77030.
    Affiliations
    Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jesus Flores Sanchez
    Affiliations
    Departments of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Services, University Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA

    Administrative Services, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Charles D. Ericcson
    Affiliations
    Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jaime Mendiola Gomez
    Affiliations
    Departments of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Services, University Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA

    Administrative Services, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Margaret W. Dupont
    Affiliations
    Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alexandro Cruz Luna
    Affiliations
    Departments of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Services, University Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA

    Administrative Services, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • John J. Mathewson
    Affiliations
    Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      An open-label, parallel comparison of loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium® A-D)
      Imodium® A–D liquid brand loperamide hydrochloride is a registered trademark of McNeil Consumer Products Company.
      Imodium® A–D liquid brand loperamide hydrochloride is a registered trademark of McNeil Consumer Products Company.
      ; and bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol®)
      Pepto-Bismol® brand bismuth subsalicylate is a registered trademark of Procter & Gamble.
      Pepto-Bismol® brand bismuth subsalicylate is a registered trademark of Procter & Gamble.
      ; was conducted using nonprescription dosages in adult students with acute diarrhea (three or more unformed stools in the preceding 24 hours plus at least one additional symptom of enteric infection). For the two-day study period, the daily dosage was limited to 8 mg (40 ml) for loperamide-treated subjects and to 4.9 g for bismuth subsalicylate-treated subjects. At these dosages, loperamide significantly reduced the average number of unformed bowel movements relative to bismuth subsalicylate. Following the initial dose of treatment, control of diarrhea was maintained significantly longer with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. Time to last unformed stool was significantly shorter with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. In providing overall subjective relief, subjects rated loperamide significantly better than bismuth subsalicylate at the end of the 24 hours. Both treatments were well tolerated, and none of the minor adverse effects reported resulted in discontinuation of therapy. It was concluded that loperamide is effective at a daily dosage limit of 8 mg (40 ml) for the treatment of acute nonspecific diarrhea and provides faster, more effective relief than bismuth subsalicylate.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nelemans FA
        • Zeivelder WG
        A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of loperamide (Imodium®) in acute diarrhea.
        J Drug Res. 1976; 2: 54-59
        • Amery W
        • Duyck F
        • Polak J
        • et al.
        A multicentre double-blind study in acute diarrhoea comparing loperamide (R18553) with two common antidiarrhoeal agents and a placebo.
        Curr Ther Res. 1975; 17: 263-270
        • Comett J
        • Aspeling R
        • Mallegol D
        A double-blind comparative evaluation of loperamide versus diphenoxylate with atropine in acute diarrhea.
        Curr Ther Res. 1977; 21: 629-637
        • Dom J
        • Leyman R
        • Schuermans V
        • et al.
        Loperamide (R18553), a novel type of antidiarrheal agent.
        Arzneimittelforschung. 1974; 24: 1660-1665
        • Johnson PC
        • Ericsson CD
        • Dupont HL
        • et al.
        Comparison of loperamide with bismuth subsalicylate for the treatment of acute travelers' diarrhea.
        JAMA. 1986; 255: 757-760