<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>The American Journal of Medicine - Articles in Press</title><description>The American Journal of Medicine RSS feed: Articles in Press.    
 The American Journal of Medicine  - "The Green Journal" -  publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal 
medicine, both in academia and community-based practice.  The American Journal of Medicine  is the official journal of The Association 
of Professors of Medicine, a prestigious group comprised of chairs of departments of internal medicine at more than 125 medical schools 
across the country. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, 
including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance, and position papers on health care issues, 
medical education, and public policy.  The journal's ISI factor - the international measure of cited manuscripts and scientific impact 
- is fourteenth in the world among all general medical journals.
  
 The  AJM  publishes studies performed by multi-center groups 
in the various disciplines of medicine, including clinical trials and cohort studies from large patient populations, specifically: 

 
 Phase I, phase II, and phase III studies performed under the auspices of groups such as general clinical research centers, cooperative 
oncology groups, and the like.   
 Reports of patients with common presentations or diseases, especially studies that delineate 
the natural history and therapy of important conditions.  
 Reviews oriented to the practicing internist and  diagnostic puzzles, 
complete with images from a variety of specialties. 
 Careful physiological or pharmacological studies that explain normal function 
or the body's response to disease.  
 Analytic reviews such as meta-analyses and decision analyses that use a formal structure 
to summarize an important field.  
 
   </description><link>http://www.amjmed.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0002-9343</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005705/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100653X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009120/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100581X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009090/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004189/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004815/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006486/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311008540/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009156/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005821/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006450/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006462/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005705/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Variation in Use of Head Computed Tomography by Emergency Physicians - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005705/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Objective: 
Variation in emergency department head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with atraumatic headaches between hospitals is being measured nationwide. However, the magnitude of interphysician variation within a hospital is currently unknown. We hypothesized that there was significant variation in the rates of physician head CT use, both overall and for patients diagnosed with atraumatic headaches.

Methods: 
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency department of a large urban academic hospital, and institutional review board approval was obtained. All emergency department visits from 2009 were analyzed, and the primary outcome measure was whether or not head CT was performed. Logistic regression was used to control for patient, physician, and visit characteristics potentially associated with head CT ordering. The degree of interphysician variability was tested, both before and after controlling for these variables.

Results: 
Of 55,286 emergency department patient encounters, 4919 (8.9%) involved head CT examinations. Unadjusted head CT ordering rates per physician ranged from 4.4% to 16.9% overall and from 15.2% to 61.7% in patients diagnosed with atraumatic headaches, with both rates varying significantly between physicians. Two-fold variation in head CT ordering overall (6.5%-13.5%) and approximately 3-fold variation in head CT ordering for atraumatic headaches (21.2%-60.1%) persisted even after controlling for pertinent variables.

Conclusion: 
Emergency physicians vary significantly in their use of head CT both overall and in patients with atraumatic headaches. Further studies are needed to identify strategies to reduce interphysician variation in head CT use.
</description><dc:title>Variation in Use of Head Computed Tomography by Emergency Physicians - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Luciano M. Prevedello, Ali S. Raja, Richard D. Zane, Aaron Sodickson, Stuart Lipsitz, Louise Schneider, Richard Hanson, Srinivasan Mukundan, Ramin Khorasani</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.023</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>SPECIAL SECTION</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100653X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Closing of St Vincent's Hospital in New York City: What Happened to the House Staff Orphans? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100653X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>During a time when a significant percentage of the population is uninsured and the cost of medical care has become unmanageable, it is no surprise that hospitals have recently fallen prey to mounting debt and financial woes.</description><dc:title>The Closing of St Vincent's Hospital in New York City: What Happened to the House Staff Orphans? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Elizabeth Zheng, William H. Frishman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009120/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Thrombolytic Therapy in Unstable Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Saves Lives but Underused - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009120/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
Data are sparse and inconsistent regarding whether thrombolytic therapy reduces case fatality rate in unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism. We tested the hypothesis that thrombolytic therapy reduces case fatality rate in such patients.

Methods: 
In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate according to treatment was determined in unstable patients with pulmonary embolism who were discharged from short-stay hospitals throughout the United States from 1999 to 2008 by using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Unstable patients were in shock or ventilator dependent.

Results: 
Among unstable patients with pulmonary embolism, 21,390 of 72,230 (30%) received thrombolytic therapy. In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate in unstable patients with thrombolytic therapy was 3105 of 21,390 (15%) versus 23,820 of 50,840 (47%) without thrombolytic therapy (P&lt;.0001). All-cause case fatality rate in unstable patients with thrombolytic therapy plus a vena cava filter was 505 of 6630 (7.6%) versus 4260 of 12,850 (33%) with a filter alone (P&lt;.0001). Case fatality rate attributable to pulmonary embolism in unstable patients was 820 of 9810 (8.4%) with thrombolytic therapy versus 1080 of 2600 (42%) with no thrombolytic therapy (P&lt;.0001). Case fatality rate attributable to pulmonary embolism in unstable patients with thrombolytic therapy plus vena cava filter was 70 of 2590 (2.7%) versus 160 of 600 (27%) with a filter alone (P&lt;.0001).

Conclusion: 
In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate and case fatality rate attributable to pulmonary embolism in unstable patients was lower in those who received thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy resulted in a lower case fatality rate than using vena cava filters alone, and the combination resulted in an even lower case fatality rate. Thrombolytic therapy in combination with a vena cava filter in unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism seems indicated.
</description><dc:title>Thrombolytic Therapy in Unstable Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Saves Lives but Underused - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Paul D. Stein, Fadi Matta</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100581X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Canary in the Coal Mine: Cardiac Troponins in Noncoronary Diseases - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS000293431100581X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The development and refinement of assays measuring serum concentrations of cardiac-specific troponins have added greatly to our ability to diagnosis and manage patients with signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndromes. Troponin samples also are frequently obtained to “rule out” myocardial infarction or ischemia in a host of different acute clinical settings and in less acute illness to determine if cardiac involvement might be present. The improved sensitivity of newer-generation assays has allowed detection of ever smaller elevations, often in patients with no evidence of clinical heart diseases.</description><dc:title>Canary in the Coal Mine: Cardiac Troponins in Noncoronary Diseases - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Stephen A. Geraci</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.014</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009090/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Renin-Angiotensin Inhibition in Systolic Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009090/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
The role of renin-angiotensin inhibition in older patients with systolic heart failure with chronic kidney disease remains unclear.

Methods: 
Of the 1665 patients (aged≥65 years) with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction&lt;45%) and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate&lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2), 1046 received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Propensity scores for the receipt of these drugs, estimated for each of the 1665 patients, were used to assemble a matched cohort of 444 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving these drugs who were balanced on 56 baseline characteristics.

Results: 
During more than 8 years of follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 75% and 79% of matched patients with chronic kidney disease receiving and not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.996; P=.045). There was no significant association with heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.03; P=.094). Similar mortality reduction (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-1.00; P=.046) occurred in a subgroup of matched patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among 171 pairs of propensity-matched patients without chronic kidney disease, the use of these drugs was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94; P=.015) and heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P=.023).

Conclusion: 
Discharge prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers was associated with a significant modest reduction in all-cause mortality in older patients with systolic heart failure with chronic kidney disease, including those with more advanced chronic kidney disease.
</description><dc:title>Renin-Angiotensin Inhibition in Systolic Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ali Ahmed, Gregg C. Fonarow, Yan Zhang, Paul W. Sanders, Richard M. Allman, Donna K. Arnett, Margaret A. Feller, Thomas E. Love, Inmaculada B. Aban, Raynald Levesque, O. James Ekundayo, Louis J. Dell'Italia, George L. Bakris, Michael W. Rich</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004189/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Revitalizing the History and Clinical Examination - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004189/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>History-taking and the physical examination of the patient have come into dire straits in recent years. A superficial history missing many key findings; cutting the patient's story short within seconds; the frequent adoption of a “computer-centered” rather than patient-centered approach; the cursory examination of patients through their clothes; the carrying of the stethoscope around the neck but of no other essential instruments—all these habits have become prevalent today and may become even more widespread in the foreseeable future.</description><dc:title>Revitalizing the History and Clinical Examination - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ami Schattner</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.05.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004815/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Impact of Vena Cava Filters on In-Hospital Case Fatality Rate from Pulmonary Embolism - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311004815/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
The effects of vena cava filters on case fatality rate are not clear, although they are used increasingly in patients with pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this investigation is to determine categories of patients with pulmonary embolism in whom vena cava filters reduce in-hospital case fatality rate.

Methods: 
In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate according to the use of vena cava filters was determined in patients with pulmonary embolism discharged from short-stay hospitals throughout the United States using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Results: 
In-hospital case fatality rate was marginally lower in stable patients who received a vena cava filter: 21,420 of 297,700 (7.2%) versus 135,240 of 1,712,800 (7.9%) (P&lt;.0001). Filters did not improve in-hospital case fatality rate if deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed in stable patients. A few stable patients (1.4%) received thrombolytic therapy. Such patients who received a vena cava filter had a lower case fatality rate than those who did not: 550 of 8550 (6.4%) versus 2950 of 19,050 (15%) (P&lt;.0001). Unstable patients who received thrombolytic therapy had a lower in-hospital case fatality rate with vena cava filters than those who did not: 505 of 6630 (7.6%) versus 2600 of 14,760 (18%) (P&lt;.0001). Unstable patients who did not receive thrombolytic therapy also had a lower in-hospital case fatality rate with a vena cava filter: 4260 of 12,850 (33%) versus 19,560 of 38,000 (51%) (P&lt;.0001).

Conclusion: 
At present, it seems prudent to consider a vena cava filter in patients with pulmonary embolism who are receiving thrombolytic therapy and in unstable patients who may not be candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Future prospective study is warranted to better define in which patients a filter is appropriate.
</description><dc:title>Impact of Vena Cava Filters on In-Hospital Case Fatality Rate from Pulmonary Embolism - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Paul D. Stein, Fadi Matta, Daniel C. Keyes, Gary L. Willyerd</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.05.025</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>SPECIAL SECTION</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006486/abstract?rss=yes"><title>High Hospital Occupancy Is Associated with Increased Risk for Patients Boarding in the Emergency Department - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006486/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
Boarding admitted patients in the emergency department due to high hospital occupancy is a worldwide problem. However, whether or not emergency department-boarded patients managed by emergency department providers subjects them to increased serious complications needs further clarification.

Methods: 
A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship of patient's age, sex, arrival hours, diagnostic category, triage category, daily emergency department visits, and daily hospital occupancy to the occurrence of serious complications within 24 hours for 20,276 emergency admissions in a 4-year period.

Results: 
A vast majority of study days (86.5%) saw very high occupancy ≥90%. Serious complications incidence was 13.62 per 1000 patient days when hospital occupancy was ≤90%, and it increased significantly to 17.10 and 22.52 per 1000 patient days for occupancy at 90%-95% and ≥95%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for serious complications included daily occupancy ≥95% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.39), triage category (adjusted OR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.17-0.24), and specific diagnoses (injury and poisoning [adjusted OR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.22-2.84], respiratory [adjusted OR 2.48; 95% CI, 1.37-4.49], and circulatory [adjusted OR 3.24; 95% CI, 1.80-5.80]).

Conclusion: 
High hospital occupancy was associated with an increased incidence of serious complications within 24 hours for patients admitted but still boarded in the emergency department and managed by emergency department providers.
</description><dc:title>High Hospital Occupancy Is Associated with Increased Risk for Patients Boarding in the Emergency Department - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jian-Cang Zhou, Kong-Han Pan, Dao-Yang Zhou, San-Wei Zheng, Jian-Qing Zhu, Qiu-Ping Xu, Chang-Liang Wang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.030</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311008540/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Cardiovascular Risk Profile of Atherosclerotic Gastrointestinal Ischemia is Different from Other Vascular Beds - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311008540/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
The distribution of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic gastrointestinal ischemia due to atherosclerosis of the splanchnic vessels (chronic splanchnic syndrome) is not well studied. The aim of this study was to determine the cardiovascular risk factor pattern in patients with chronic splanchnic syndrome.

Methods: 
From April 2003 to September 2007, atherosclerotic risk factors in consecutive patients with chronic splanchnic syndrome were compared prospectively with the general atherosclerotic risk profile in Western Europe and worldwide risk profile of coronary heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and cerebral vascular disease.

Results: 
Of 376 analyzed patients, 97 were diagnosed with chronic splanchnic syndrome. Data from 90 patients were available for analysis (7 were excluded because of incomplete data). Mean age was 63 years (range 28-86 years), and 74% were female. Fifty-nine percent of the patients had atherosclerotic disease in other vascular beds. Smoking was reported in 57%, and increased bodyweight in 21%. Hypercholesterolemia was present in 53%, hypertension in 62%, and diabetes in 21%.

Conclusions: 
The atherosclerotic risk profile in patients with chronic splanchnic syndrome differed from other atherosclerotic diseases with a female preponderance, lower incidence of obesity/increased bodyweight, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Reduced caloric intake, related to the postprandial pain, may explain the observed differences.
</description><dc:title>The Cardiovascular Risk Profile of Atherosclerotic Gastrointestinal Ischemia is Different from Other Vascular Beds - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Renzo P. Veenstra, Rinze W.F. ter Steege, Robert H. Geelkerken, Ad B. Huisman, Jeroen J. Kolkman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009156/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Interpretation of Point-of-care INR Results in Patients Treated with Dabigatran - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311009156/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
Point-of-care devices for measurement of the international normalized ratio (INR) are commonly used to monitor therapy and maintain therapeutic levels of anticoagulation in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran, a new oral, reversible direct thrombin inhibitor approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation does not require routine coagulation monitoring. However, case reports have identified falsely elevated point-of-care INR levels in patients treated with dabigatran using one of these devices (Hemochron). This in vitro study was designed to verify this issue.

Methods: 
We compared INR levels in whole blood and plasma using a Hemochron Jr. Signature+ point-of-care device (International Technidyne Corporation, Edison, NJ) with routine laboratory monitoring, using blood from healthy volunteers that was spiked with increasing concentrations of dabigatran.

Results: 
Prothrombin time and INR levels were increased about 2- to 4-fold with the point-of-care device compared with laboratory measures across the plasma dabigatran concentration range 50-1400 ng/mL. At plasma concentrations of dabigatran likely to be observed in patients, at a dose of 150 mg twice daily (60-275 ng/mL), whole blood point-of-care INR values increased from 1.7 to 4.0, versus 1.1 to 1.5 measured with the laboratory coagulometer. Similar differences in prothrombin time were observed in plasma samples.

Conclusions: 
INR levels in patients taking dabigatran are substantially higher using a Hemochron Jr. point-of-care device compared with laboratory values. We discourage the use of these devices specifically, as well as the use of the INR in general, for measuring the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran.
</description><dc:title>Interpretation of Point-of-care INR Results in Patients Treated with Dabigatran - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Joanne van Ryn, Lawrence Baruch, Andreas Clemens</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.017</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BRIEF OBSERVATION</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005821/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagiarism, or Fool's Gold? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311005821/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Traditionally, personal integrity and professional accountability have guaranteed appropriate authorship of biomedical journal articles. However, recent controversies, including exposés of ghostwriting and guest authorship, have shown the fallibility of this trust.</description><dc:title>Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagiarism, or Fool's Gold? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Xavier Bosch, Joseph S. Ross</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006450/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Variation of Fasting Plasma Glucose: A Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006450/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
Background: 
The aim of this study was to examine whether time-dependent annual fasting plasma glucose (FPG) variation, as represented by coefficient of variation (CV), can predict mortality in subsequent all-cause, expanded, and nonexpanded cardiovascular disease-related mortality independent of mean FPG, renal function, mean hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), HbA1C variation, and other risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: 
A computerized database of all patients with type 2 diabetes aged 30 years and over (n = 5008) enrolled in the Diabetes Care Management Program of China Medical University Hospital before 2007 was used in a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results: 
The mortality rates were 8.64, 12.71, and 30.82 per 1000 person-years in groups of first, second, and third tertiles of baseline FPG-CV, respectively. Among these patients with type 2 diabetes, 336, 1191, 914, 585, and 1979 patients provided 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more years of annual FPG-CV measurements, respectively. After adjusting for mean FPG, mean HbA1C, HbA1C variation, and other risk factors, annual FPG-CV was independently associated with all-cause mortality and mortality due to expanded and nonexpanded cardiovascular disease, and the corresponding hazard ratios for third versus first tertile of annual FPG-CV were 5.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.85-7.94), 3.21 (95% CI, 2.00-5.15), and 9.45 (95% CI, 5.37-16.63), respectively.

Conclusions: 
Time-dependent variation of FPG was a strong predictor of all-cause, expanded, and nonexpanded cardiovascular disease-related mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that glucose variation may become a measure in clinical practice for the goal in the management of these patients.
</description><dc:title>Variation of Fasting Plasma Glucose: A Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Cheng-Chieh Lin, Chia-Ing Li, Sing-Yu Yang, Chiu-Shong Liu, Ching-Chu Chen, Martin Mao-Tsu Fuh, Walter Chen, Tsai-Chung Li</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.027</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006462/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Systematic Review of Noncancer Presentations with a Median Survival of 6 Months or Less - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934311006462/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Purpose: We report on clinical indicators of 6-month mortality in advanced noncancer illnesses and the effect of treatment on survival.Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched comprehensively to find studies evaluating survival for common advanced noncancer illnesses. We retrieved and evaluated studies that reported a median survival of ≤1 year and evaluated prognostic factors or effect of treatment on survival. We extracted data on presentations with median survivals of ≤6 months for heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, geriatric failure to thrive, cirrhosis, and end-stage renal failure. Independent risk factors for survival were combined and included if their combination was associated with a 6-month mortality of ≥50%.Results: The search identified 1000 potentially relevant studies, of which 475 were retrieved and evaluated, and 74 were included. We report the common clinical presentations that are consistently associated with a 6-month median survival. Even though advanced noncancer syndromes differ clinically, a universal set of prognostic factors signals progression to terminal disease, including poor performance status, advanced age, malnutrition, comorbid illness, organ dysfunction, and hospitalization for acute decompensation. Generally, a 6-month median survival is associated with the presence of 2-4 of these factors. With few exceptions, these terminal presentations are quite refractory to treatment.Conclusion: This systematic review summarizes prognostic factors common to advanced noncancer illness. There is little evidence at present that treatment prolongs survival at these terminal stages.</description><dc:title>Systematic Review of Noncancer Presentations with a Median Survival of 6 Months or Less - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Shelley R. Salpeter, Esther J. Luo, Dawn S. Malter, Brad Stuart</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.028</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-25</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-25</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>
