<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>The American Journal of Medicine - Articles in Press</title><description>The American Journal of Medicine RSS feed: Articles in Press. 
 The American Journal of Medicine  - "The Green Journal" -  publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal 
medicine, both in academia and community-based practice.  The American Journal of Medicine  is the official journal of The Association 
of Professors of Medicine, a prestigious group comprised of chairs of departments of internal medicine at more than 125 medical schools 
across the country. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, 
including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance, and position papers on health care issues, 
medical education, and public policy.  The journal's ISI factor - the international measure of cited manuscripts and scientific impact 
- is thirteenth in the world among all general medical journals.
  
 The  AJM  publishes studies performed by multi-center groups 
in the various disciplines of medicine, including clinical trials and cohort studies from large patient populations, specifically: 

 
 Phase I, phase II, and phase III studies performed under the auspices of groups such as general clinical research centers, cooperative 
oncology groups, and the like.   
 Reports of patients with common presentations or diseases, especially studies that delineate 
the natural history and therapy of important conditions.  
 Reviews oriented to the practicing internist and  diagnostic puzzles, 
complete with images from a variety of specialties. 
 Careful physiological or pharmacological studies that explain normal function 
or the body's response to disease.  
 Analytic reviews such as meta-analyses and decision analyses that use a formal structure 
to summarize an important field.  
 
</description><link>http://www.amjmed.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0002-9343</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309006640/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309011103/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309006640/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Racial Differences in Atrial Fibrillation Prevalence and Left Atrial Size - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309006640/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: Previous studies relying on clinical care data have suggested that atrial fibrillation is less common in African Americans than Caucasians, but the mechanism remains unknown. Clinical care may itself vary by race, potentially affecting the accuracy of atrial fibrillation ascertainment in studies relying on clinical data. We sought to examine racial differences in atrial fibrillation prevalence determined by protocol-driven electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained in prospective cohort studies and to study racial differences in echocardiographic characteristics.Methods: We pooled primary data from 3 cohort studies with atrial fibrillation adjudicated from study protocol ECGs and documentation of potentially important confounders: the Heart and Soul Study (n=1014), the Heart and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Study (n=2673), and The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Sleep Study (n=2911). Left atrial anatomic dimensions were compared among races from sinus rhythm echocardiograms in the Heart and Soul Study.Results: Of the 6611 participants, 268 (4%) had atrial fibrillation: Caucasians had the highest prevalence (5%), and African Americans had the lowest (1%; P&lt;.001 for each compared with all other races). After adjustment for potential confounders, Caucasians had a 3.8-fold greater odds of having atrial fibrillation than African Americans (95% confidence interval, 1.6-8.8, P=.002). Although ventricular and atrial volumes and function were similar in Caucasians and African Americans, Caucasians had a 2 mm larger anterior-posterior left atrial diameter after adjusting for potential confounders (95% confidence interval, 1-3 mm, P&lt;.001).Conclusion: ECG confirmed atrial fibrillation is more common in Caucasians than in African Americans, which might be related to the larger left atrial diameter observed in Caucasians.</description><dc:title>Racial Differences in Atrial Fibrillation Prevalence and Left Atrial Size - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Gregory M. Marcus, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Mary Whooley, Eric Vittinghoff, Katie L. Stone, Reena Mehra, Stephen B. Hulley, Nelson B. Schiller</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.019</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309011103/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Long-acting Beta-Agonists with and without Inhaled Corticosteroids and Catastrophic Asthma Events - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.amjmed.com/article/PIIS0002934309011103/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Background: It is unclear whether long-acting β-agonists with concomitant inhaled corticosteroids increase asthma-related intubations and deaths. We pooled data on long-acting β-agonists with variable and concomitant inhaled corticosteroids to evaluate the risk for catastrophic asthma events.Methods: We conducted searches of electronic databases, the US Food and Drug Administration website, clinical-trials registries, and selected references through December 2008. We analyzed randomized controlled trials in patients with asthma, which lasted at least 3 months, evaluated long-acting β-agonists compared with placebo or long-acting β-agonists with inhaled corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone, and included at least 1 catastrophic event, defined as asthma-related intubation or death.Results: In pooled trial data that included 36,588 participants, long-acting β-agonists increased catastrophic events 2-fold (Peto odds ratio [OR] 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-3.22). Statistically significant increases were seen for long-acting β-agonists with variable corticosteroids compared with placebo (OR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.14-2.95) and for concomitant treatment with corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone (OR 3.65; 95% CI, 1.39-9.55). Similar increases in risk were seen for variable and concomitant corticosteroid use, salmeterol and formoterol, and children and adults. When the analysis was restricted to trials with controlled corticosteroid use, given as part of the study intervention, concomitant treatment still increased catastrophic events compared with corticosteroids alone (OR 8.19; 95% CI, 1.10-61.18).Conclusion: Long-acting β-agonists increase the risk for asthma-related intubations and deaths, even when used in a controlled fashion with concomitant inhaled corticosteroids.</description><dc:title>Long-acting Beta-Agonists with and without Inhaled Corticosteroids and Catastrophic Asthma Events - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Shelley R. Salpeter, Andrew J. Wall, Nicholas S. Buckley</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.07.035</dc:identifier><dc:source>The American Journal of Medicine (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-02-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The American Journal of Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-02-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>