« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 8
, Pages
735-740
, August 2010
Venous Compression for Prevention of Postthrombotic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
-
Proportional effects of venous compression on prevention of mild-to-moderate postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.52 (P <.001). Black squares
=
point estimates (wProportional effects of venous compression on prevention of mild-to-moderate postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.52 (P <.001). Black squares
=
point estimates (with area proportional to number of events) and horizontal lines
=
95% confidence interval (CI) for observed effects in different subgroups; diamonds
=
point estimate and 95% CI for overall effects, with proportional reductions indicated alongside; long vertical line
=
hazard ratio of 1.0 (ie, no effect of treatment), and shorter vertical line
=
observed overall effect. -
Proportional effects of venous compression on prevention of severe postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.38 (P <.001). Black squares=point estimates (with area pProportional effects of venous compression on prevention of severe postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.38 (P <.001). Black squares
=
point estimates (with area proportional to number of events) and horizontal lines
=
95% confidence interval (CI) for observed effects in different subgroups; diamonds
=
point estimate and 95% CI for overall effects, with proportional reductions indicated alongside; long vertical line
=
hazard ratio of 1.0 (ie, no effect of treatment), and shorter vertical line
=
observed overall effect. -
Proportional effects of venous compression on prevention of mild to-severe postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.54 (P <.001). Black squares=point estimates (witProportional effects of venous compression on prevention of mild to-severe postthrombotic syndrome. Overall relative risk with venous compression was 0.54 (P <.001). Black squares
=
point estimates (with area proportional to number of events) and horizontal lines
=
95% confidence interval (CI) for observed effects in different subgroups; diamonds
=
point estimate and 95% CI for overall effects, with proportional reductions indicated alongside; long vertical line
=
hazard ratio of 1.0 (ie, no effect of treatment), and shorter vertical line
=
observed overall effect.
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any financial or other potential conflicts of interest relative to the data in this manuscript.
Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.
PII: S0002-9343(10)00352-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.027
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 8
, Pages
735-740
, August 2010

