« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 7
, Pages 573-576
, July 2010
A Review of Clinical Guidelines with Some Thoughts about Their Utility and Appropriate Use
References
- . Why are we ignoring the guidelines?. Am J Med. 2010;123:97–98
- Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301:831–841
- Adherence to evidence-based statin guidelines reduces the risk of hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction by 40%: a cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:154–159
- Adherence to guidelines is a predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure: the MAHLER survey. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1653–1659
- Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1242–1248
- Compliance with guidelines and 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:873–880
- Care concordant with guidelines predicts decreased long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1218–1222
- . Health care: who knows best?. NY Rev Books. February 11, 2010;12–15
- . Dilemmas for doctors. NY Rev Books. December 17, 2009;22–24
- . Guideline chaos: conflicting recommendations for preoperative cardiac assessment. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1299–1303
- Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in the evaluation and treatment of patients with hypertension. Am J Med. 2004;117:14–18
- . Failure of guideline adherence for intervention in patients with mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:860–865
- Frequency of inappropriate exceptions to quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:225–231
PII: S0002-9343(10)00249-4
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.03.008
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 7
, Pages 573-576
, July 2010

