The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 6 , Pages 484-488, June 2010

Improving Stroke Risk Stratification in Atrial Fibrillation

  • Gregory Y.H. Lip, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, England
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests should be addressed to Gregory Y. H. Lip, MD, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Jonathan L. Halperin, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York

Abstract 

Risk factors for stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation used in current risk stratification schema are derived largely from analyses of clinical trial cohorts, and the available data depend on the comprehensiveness of trial reports and whether specific risk factors were sought. The most commonly used schema is the Cardiac failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke [Doubled] (CHADS2) score. Although simple and well validated, some limitations of CHADS2 this schema are apparent. A more recent approach to risk stratification of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation defines “major (definitive)” risk factors (eg, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack and age75 years) and “clinically relevant non-major” risk factors (eg, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, female gender, age 65-75 years, and atherosclerotic vascular disease). This scheme can be expressed as an acronym, CHA2DS2-VASc, denoting Cardiac failure or dysfunction, Hypertension, Age75 [Doubled], Diabetes, Stroke [Doubled]–Vascular disease, Age 65-74, and Sex category [Female]), whereby 2 points are assigned for a history of stroke or age 75 years or more and 1 point each is assigned for age 65 to 74 years, a history of hypertension, diabetes, cardiac failure, and vascular disease. Patients with 1 definitive risk factor or a patient with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 or more could be considered for oral anticoagulation, but a patient with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 is truly low risk and could be managed with no antithrombotic therapy. This would simplify our approach to thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Risk stratification, Stroke

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding: None.

 Conflict of Interest: Dr Lip has received funding for research, consultancy, and lecturing from different manufacturers of drugs used for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, including AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, Sanofi-Aventis, and Daichii-Sankyo. Dr Halperin has received consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, Bayer HealthCare, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Sanofi-Aventis, and an honorarium from Portola Pharmaceuticals for data safety monitoring activities.

 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(09)01151-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.12.013

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 6 , Pages 484-488, June 2010