The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 3 , Pages 245-249, March 2010

Orthostatic Syndromes Differ in Syncope Frequency

  • Ajitesh Ojha

      Affiliations

    • The Autonomic Laboratory, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Kevin McNeeley

      Affiliations

    • The Autonomic Laboratory, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Heller

      Affiliations

    • The Autonomic Laboratory, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Amer Alshekhlee, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Autonomic Laboratory, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Gisela Chelimsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Thomas C. Chelimsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Autonomic Laboratory, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Thomas Chelimsky, MD, Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106

Abstract 

Background

There are conflicting opinions on whether postural tachycardia syndrome predisposes to syncope. We investigated this relationship by comparing the frequency of syncope in postural tachycardia syndrome and orthostatic hypotension.

Methods

We queried our autonomic laboratory database of 3700 patients. Orthostatic hypotension and postural tachycardia syndrome were defined in standard fashion, except that postural tachycardia syndrome required the presence of orthostatic symptoms and a further increase in heart rate beyond 10 minutes. Syncope was defined as an abrupt decrease in blood pressure and often, heart rate, requiring termination of the tilt study. Statistical analysis utilized Fisher's exact test and Student's t test, as appropriate.

Results

Of 810 patients referred for postural tachycardia syndrome, 185 met criteria while another 328 patients had orthostatic hypotension. Of the postural tachycardia syndrome patients, 38% had syncope on head-up tilt, compared with only 22% of those with orthostatic hypotension (P<.0001). In the postural tachycardia group, syncope on head-up tilt was associated with a clinical history of syncope in 90%, whereas absence of syncope on head-up tilt was associated with a clinical history of syncope in 30% (P<.0001). In contrast, syncope on head-up tilt did not bear any relationship to clinical history of syncope in the orthostatic hypotension group (41% vs 36%; P=.49).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that syncope (both tilt table and clinical) occurs far more commonly in patients who have postural tachycardia syndrome than in patients with orthostatic hypotension. These findings suggest that one should be clinically aware of the high risk of syncope in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome, and the low-pressure baroreceptor system that is implicated in postural tachycardia syndrome might confer more sensitivity to syncope than the high pressure system implicated in orthostatic hypotension.

Keywords: Dysautonomias, Orthostatic hypotension, Postural tachycardia syndrome, Syncope, Tilt table test

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding: Ajitesh Ojha received a T35 NIH grant for the project. No other funding was received.

 Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have conflicts of interest of financial disclosures to make.

 Authorship: All authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis. All authors had a role in the writing of the manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(09)00948-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.018

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 123, Issue 3 , Pages 245-249, March 2010