The Thrombin Hypothesis in ACS: A Disappointing Disconnect between Bench Data and Bedside Clinical Trials
Abstract
Studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, a common limitation of unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin is that neither can neutralize clot-bound thrombin. To overcome this limitation of the broad heparin-based anticoagulants, novel anticoagulants targeted for both the free and clot-bound forms of thrombin (direct thrombin inhibitors), or other individual components of the coagulation cascade (eg, direct and indirect factor Xa inhibitors), were developed. These targeted anticoagulation agents showed promising results in preclinical testing and have been evaluated in large-scale clinical acute coronary syndrome trials. This review discusses the disconnect between the excellent preclinical findings obtained with these novel, targeted agents and the efficacy and safety data observed in patients with acute coronary syndrome, compared with the broader-range heparin-based anticoagulants.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Direct thrombin inhibitors, Factor Xa inhibitors
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Funding: Editorial/writing support for the preparation of this manuscript was funded by sanofi-aventis. The author, however, was fully responsible for all content and received no financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of the article.
Conflict of Interest: The author received grant support from Aventis Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from sanofi-aventis and AstraZeneca, and lecture fees from sanofi-aventis, Merck, and Schering.
Authorship: Author had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.
PII: S0002-9343(09)00772-4
doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.001
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

