The Association between Smoking and Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective
To assess the association between smoking and low back pain with meta-analysis.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until February 2009. Eighty-one studies were reviewed and 40 (27 cross-sectional and 13 cohort) studies were included in the meta-analyses.
Results
In cross-sectional studies, current smoking was associated with increased prevalence of low back pain in the past month (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.45), low back pain in the past 12 months (OR 1.33, 95% CI, 1.26-1.41), seeking care for low back pain (OR 1.49, 95% CI, 1.38-1.60), chronic low back pain (OR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.27-2.50) and disabling low back pain (OR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.11-4.13). Former smokers had a higher prevalence of low back pain compared with never smokers, but a lower prevalence of low back pain than current smokers. In cohort studies, both former (OR 1.32, 95% CI, 0.99-1.77) and current (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.11-1.55) smokers had an increased incidence of low back pain compared with never smokers. The association between current smoking and the incidence of low back pain was stronger in adolescents (OR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.42-2.33) than in adults (OR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.02-1.32).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that both current and former smokers have a higher prevalence and incidence of low back pain than never smokers, but the association is fairly modest. The association between current smoking and the incidence of low back pain is stronger in adolescents than in adults.
aCentre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Rahman Shiri, MD, PhD, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, Helsinki FIN-00250, Finland
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authorship: All authors had a role in writing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the design of the review, as well as interpretation of the findings and preparing the report. R. Shiri and S. Solovieva carried out the MEDLINE searches. R. Shiri carried out the EMBASE searches. All authors assessed the quality of the studies. R. Shiri carried out the meta-analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.
ABSTRACT
