| | Statins Decrease the Occurrence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with CancerAbstract BackgroundRecent data suggest a reduction in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in select groups of patients who use statins. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of statin use on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid organ tumor. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, case-control study reviewing 740 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of solid organ tumor who were admitted to the Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Penn, between October 2004 and September 2007. Patients treated with anticoagulation therapy before their first admission were excluded. The occurrence of venous thromboembolism, risk factors for venous thromboembolism, and statin use were recorded. Patients who never used statins or had used them for less than 2 months were relegated to the control group. ConclusionThis study suggests that the use of statins is associated with a significant reduction in the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. This pleiotropic effect warrants further investigation. The tendency for venous thromboembolism to develop in patients with malignancy was first described by Trousseau in 1865.1 This association has remained throughout the evolution of modern medicine, and recent literature suggests that cancer alone poses a 4.1-fold increased risk of thrombosis over that of the general population and that chemotherapy further increases the risk 6.5-fold.2, 3 This is of particular concern because complications from deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are a leading cause of death in patients with cancer.4 Clinical Significance•In addition to a cholesterol-lowering effect, statins exhibit antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties that might affect coagulation cascade. •In patients with cancer, the use of statins decreased the OR (0.33) of developing venous thromboembolism (95% CI, 0.19-0.57; P <.05) compared with non-statin users. •Statin use might confer protection against the risk of developing venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Many conditions are associated with both arterial and venous thromboses, such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, specific malignancies, and hyperhomocysteinaemia.5 Because common pathways overlap regarding the formation of arterial and venous thrombosis, it is reasonable to theorize a relationship exists between conditions such as dyslipidemia and venous thromboembolism. Consequently, it may be worthwhile to suggest that treatment for dyslipidemia might affect the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. Dyslipidemia plays a major role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. There are proposed effects of dyslipidemia on the vascular endothelium6 and the activation of platelets.7 Furthermore, circulating lipids seem to have both prothrombotic and endothelium-altering properties.6, 8 Recent epidemiologic evidence links dyslipidemia and venous thromboembolism. Three case-control studies9, 10, 11 have shown the relationship between dyslipidemia or increased lipoprotein (a) levels and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, or statins, are currently viewed as the most potent lipid-lowering medication available. Their efficacy in reducing coronary morbidity and mortality has been established by several large primary and secondary prevention trials.12 In addition to their cholesterol-lowering property, statins exhibit non–lipid-related action against atherosclerosis through various mechanisms. Recent studies suggest that statins might alter elements within the vascular endothelium and coagulation cascade in a manner consistent with an antithrombotic effect.13, 14 Devaraj et al15 studied the effect of simvastatin (Zocor; Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ) on serum markers of inflammation (eg, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, monocytic cytokines, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1) in patients with metabolic syndrome. Their study showed a direct anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin therapy, which significantly decreased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at 8 weeks compared with placebo. Furthermore, a recent randomized control trial, the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin, in healthy adults demonstrated the efficacy of rosuvastatin (Crestor; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Wilmington, DE) in the reduction of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37% after a median follow-up of 1.9 years.16 The recently published secondary end point of this trial demonstrated the significant reduction of the rates of venous thromboembolism in the rosuvastatin group with a hazard ratio of 0.57 compared with the placebo group.17 Two other clinical studies investigated the relationship between the use of statins and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. A retrospective cohort study in Canada demonstrated a 22% relative risk reduction in the risk of deep vein thrombosis in an elderly population using statins.18 In a retrospective subgroup analysis of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study, the risk of venous thromboembolism was significantly reduced among women who received statin therapy compared with the non-user group.19 These preliminary studies suggest that statins might lower the risk for venous thromboembolism. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer is a common scenario encountered in clinical practice. Recent developments in molecular biology have indicated that the high risk of venous thromboembolism in malignancy is attributed to the hypercoagulable state caused by the disease and its treatments.20 On the basis of currently available data, it is hypothesized that statins might have a role for primary prevention in patients with high risk for venous thromboembolism. The objective of this study is to determine the association between the use of statins and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid organ tumor, who are considered to be a high-risk population. Materials and Methods  We conducted a retrospective case-control study. All patients with a history of solid organ tumor, such as breast, colon, lung, prostate, stomach, esophagus, pancreas, ovary, kidney, and brain cancer (Table 1), who were admitted to Albert Einstein Medical Center between October 2004 and September 2007 were eligible. The occurrence of venous thromboembolism and concurrent use of a statin within 2 months of admission were recorded. Statin use included simvastatin (Zocor; Merck & Co, Inc), atorvastatin (Lipitor; Pfizer U.S. Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY), rosuvastatin (Crestor; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP), lovastatin (Mevacor; Merck & Co, Inc), pravastatin (Pravachol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY), and fluvastatin (Lescol, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill). Dosage of statin use also was recorded. Possible risk factors for venous thromboembolism and comorbidities were assessed. Patients who never used statins or had used them for less than 2 months were assigned to the control group. All patients included had at least 2 hospital admissions. | | |  | Type of Solid Organ Tumor | No. of Patients (N = 740) |  |
|---|
 | Breast cancer | 170 (23%) |  |  | Lung cancer | 95 (13%) |  |  | Colon cancer | 55 (8%) |  |  | Prostate cancer | 160 (21%) |  |  | Stomach cancer | 20 (3%) |  |  | Esophageal cancer | 45 (6%) |  |  | Pancreatic cancer | 56 (8%) |  |  | Ovarian cancer | 50 (7%) |  |  | Kidney cancer | 60 (8%) |  |  | Brain cancer | 29 (4%) |  | | | |
In total, 1194 patients with a diagnosed solid organ tumor were identified (Figure 1). However, 454 patients were excluded for the following reasons: advanced age, benign tumor, other types of malignancy, incomplete medical record, or currently receiving treatment with anticoagulation therapy (oral warfarin or intravenous heparin). A total of 740 patients were included in this study. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound with the single criteria of vein compressibility with the transducer probe. The femoral and popliteal veins were evaluated for noncompressibility. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography with the presence of segmental or subsegmental emboli in pulmonary veins or high probability on ventilation-perfusion scan with high clinical probability. All data were collected from the electronic medical record system. Demographic data and laboratory values were collected, including age, gender, and race. In addition, data were collected on comorbidities, risk factors for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, additional treatments (diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, immobilization, documented metastatic disease, current use of chemotherapy, history of smoking, use of aspirin, statin use at the time of admission), and whether or not the patient had a deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Patients who had either a deep vein thrombosis or a pulmonary embolism were included in the venous thromboembolism group. Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of the total group, as well as for those who did and did not use statins. The relationship between factors predictive of venous thromboembolism and comorbidities, such as diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, immobilization, documented metastatic disease, current use of chemotherapy, history of smoking within 1 year, use of aspirin, and use of statins, were analyzed using the chi-square test. An odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the relationship between the use of statins and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The relationship between the use of statins and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism, controlling for comorbidities and other factors related to venous thromboembolism, was analyzed using logistic regression. Results  The mean age of the study sample was 65 years (standard deviation = 13). Fifty-two percent of the patients were women, and 76% were African American. The overall frequency of venous thromboembolism was 18% (N = 132), 31% of patients had a history of dyslipidemia, and 26% (N = 194) were receiving statins. Baseline characteristics of the study sample comparing the statin user group with the control group are shown in Table 2. The distribution of the use of statins is listed in Table 3. | | |  | | Statin User (%) N = 194 | Control Group (%) N = 546 | Total N = 740 |  |
|---|
 | Age | 66 y | 65 y | 65 y |  |  | Gender | | | |  |  | Female | 97 (50%) | 289 (53%) | 386 (52%) |  |  | Male | 97 (50%) | 257 (47%) | 354 (48%) |  |  | Race | | | |  |  | African American | 144 (74%) | 418 (76%) | 562 (76%) |  |  | Caucasian | 37 (19%) | 92 (17%) | 129 (17%) |  |  | Others | 13 (7%) | 36 (7%) | 49 (7%) |  |  | Diabetes | 82 (42%) | 110 (20%) | 192 (26%) |  |  | Hypertension | 170 (87%) | 322 (59%) | 492 (66%) |  |  | Immobilization | 33 (25%) | 71 (12%) | 104 (14%) |  |  | Metastatic disease | 53 (40%) | 131 (21%) | 184 (24%) |  |  | Current chemotherapy | 37 (28%) | 96 (16%) | 133 (18%) |  |  | Smoking | 28 (21%) | 183 (30%) | 211 (29%) |  |  | Use of aspirin | 19 (14%) | 138 (23%) | 157 (21%) |  | | | |
| | |  | Type of Statins Used | Standard Dose (<40 mg) (N = 184) | High Dose (>40 mg) (N = 10) | Total No. of Patients (N = 194) |  |
|---|
 | Simvastatin | 50 | 2 | 52 (27%) |  |  | Atorvastatin | 103 | 3 | 106 (55%) |  |  | Lovastatin | 14 | 2 | 16 (8%) |  |  | Pravastatin | 10 | 2 | 12 (6%) |  |  | Rosuvastatin/fluvastatin | 7 | 1 | 8 (4%) |  | | | |
The average duration of the follow-up period for statin users was 10.2 months (range, 2-41 months). Among statin users, the majority of patients (95%) were using a standard dose of statins (up to 40 mg per day of any statins). In a comparison of 2 frequently prescribed statins, there were fewer occurrences of venous thromboembolism with simvastatin compared with atorvastatin (7.7% in the simvastatin group and 8.5% in the atorvastatin group, P = .029). Having a history of diabetes and hypertension did not affect the odds of having a venous thromboembolism (OR 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.45; OR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.56-1.22, respectively). Immobilization, documented metastatic disease, and current use of chemotherapy statistically significantly increased the odds of developing venous thromboembolism (OR 2.52, 95% CI, 1.58-4.01; OR 2.44, 95% CI, 1.64-3.63; OR 2.07, 95% CI, 1.34-3.22, respectively). Smoking, use of aspirin, and use of statins were related to a decreased odds of developing a venous thromboembolism (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.34-0.96; OR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.19-0.57, respectively) (Table 4 and Figure 2). Bivariate analyses on statin use demonstrated the reductions were similar in subgroup analysis among patients with deep vein thrombosis (OR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.2-0.76) and pulmonary embolism (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.08-0.97). | | |  | | OR | 95% CI |  |
|---|
 | Diabetes | 0.94 | 0.61-1.45 |  |  | Hypertension | 0.82 | 0.56-1.22 |  |  | Immobilization | 2.52 | 1.58-4.02 |  |  | Metastatic disease | 2.44 | 1.64-3.64 |  |  | Current chemotherapy | 2.08 | 1.34-3.22 |  |  | Smoking | 0.62 | 0.40-0.98 |  |  | Aspirin use | 0.57 | 0.34-0.96 |  |  | Statin use | 0.33 | 0.19-0.58 |  | | | |
A logistic regression analysis included factors that were statistically significant in the bivariate analyses and have been shown to be related to venous thromboembolism (smoking, documented metastatic disease, current use of chemotherapy, immobilization, use of aspirin, and use of statin), along with statin use. Statin use continued to be related to a decreased odds of developing a venous thromboembolism, similar to the bivariate relationship between statin use and venous thromboembolism (OR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.19-0.59; P <.001). On the other hand, smoking and use of aspirin were no longer statistically significantly related to decreased odds of developing a venous thromboembolism (OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.39-1.01 and OR 0.69, 95% CI, 0.39-1.2, respectively) (Table 5 and Figure 3). | | |  | Factors | OR | 95% CI | P Value |  |
|---|
 | Immobilization | 2.88 | 1.74-4.75 | <.001 |  |  | Metastatic disease | 2.07 | 1.34-3.18 | .001 |  |  | Current chemotherapy | 1.77 | 1.10-2.86 | .019 |  |  | Smoking | 0.63 | 0.39-1.01 | .055 |  |  | Aspirin use | 0.69 | 0.40-1.20 | .188 |  |  | Statin use | 0.33 | 0.18-0.59 | <.001 |  | | | |
Discussion  We examined the relationship between factors related to venous thromboembolism and the comorbidities with the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and statin use in hospitalized patients with cancer. In this study, immobilization, documented metastatic disease, and active chemotherapy were all related to increased odds of developing venous thromboembolism. These are well-established risk factors in this population, and this finding is consistent with other recent studies.21, 22 In regard to aspirin use, a meta-analysis on antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular outcomes showed a significantly reduced risk in the incidence of fatal or nonfatal pulmonary embolism with an odds reduction of 25%.23 However, a recent randomized trial of healthy women demonstrated no clear benefit of aspirin in terms of long-term prevention of venous thromboembolism.24 Our findings are consistent with this result regarding aspirin use. Smoking seemed to be a protective factor for venous thromboembolism by bivariate analysis. However, smoking no longer statistically reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism in the logistic regression. It seems that patients who did not smoke during the study period were more likely to be immobilized, which was related to an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism. The inclusion of immobilization in the logistic regression equation might have minimized the effect of smoking. Our study provides preliminary evidence that statin use might confer protection against the risk of developing venous thromboembolism. There have been many preclinical studies on the effect of statin use and anti-inflammatory effects,25 and evidence that their use might alter vascular endothelial function.26 These studies suggest a pleiotropic effect of statins. On the basis of these theories, statin use might potentially decrease endothelial injury that is prone to propagate thrombus formation. In addition, there is evidence that patients with high levels of apolipoprotein A1 and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol have a decreased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.27 These theories might explain the protective effect statin use confers on patients with cancer, who have a high risk of developing venous thromboembolism. Lastly, statins have a satisfactory safety profile with relatively few adverse effects. The elevation of hepatic transaminase is a common side effect of statin use, but this is often dose-related. For atorvastatin, the rate was 0.2% with 10 mg and 2.3% with 80 mg.28 Warfarin remains the most common preventative medication for venous thromboembolism, but warfarin has multiple concerns and limitations. The therapeutic range needs to be closely monitored, and the case-fatality rate of major bleeding was 9.1% in patients who received anticoagulant therapy for more than 3 months.29 Anticoagulation therapy is contraindicated in patients with active intracranial bleeding30 and needs to be monitored closely in patients with metastatic lesions in the brain, leaving statins as a possible alternative medication for this group of patients. Limitations  This study has several limitations. It is retrospective, and there are incomplete records on serum lipid levels and serum markers of inflammation, which could help explain the effect of statins on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. Moreover, the dosage of each statin was not categorized to distinguish the effect of statins because there might be a dose-relationship response. Conclusions  This study provides preliminary data that patients with solid organ tumors receiving statins might have a lower occurrence of developing a venous thromboembolism. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial would provide further support and stronger evidence for this finding. References  1. 1Trousseau A. Phlegmasia alba dolens. Clin Med Hotel Dieu de Paris. 1865;3:94–96. 2. 2Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809–815. MEDLINE 3. 3Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585–593. MEDLINE 4. 4Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, et al. Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:632–643. MEDLINE 5. 5Ray JG. Why might statins prevent venous thromboembolism: what needs to be done to know more?. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:1659–1668. MEDLINE 6. 6Sattar N, Petrie JR, Jaap AJ. The atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype and vascular endothelial dysfunction. Atherosclerosis. 1998;138:229–235. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (81 KB)
7. 7Pathansali R, Smith N, Bath P. Altered megakaryocyte-platelet haemostatic axis in hypercholesterolemia. Platelets. 2001;12:292–297. MEDLINE 8. 8Miller GJ. Lipoproteins and the hemostatic system in atherothrombotic disorders. Bailliere's Best Pract Res Clin Hematol. 1999;12:555–575. 9. 9Kawasaki T, Kambayashi J, Ariyoshi H, et al. Hypercholesterolemia as a risk factor for deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Res. 1997;88:67–73. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (982 KB)
10. 10Nowak-Gottl U, Junker R, Hartmeier M, et al. Increased lipoprotein(a) is an important risk factor for venous thromboembolism in childhood. Circulation. 1999;100:743–748. 11. 11Von depka M, Nowak-Gottl U, Eisert R, et al. Increased lipoprotein(a) levels as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2000;96:3364–3368. MEDLINE 12. 12Maron DJ, Fazio S, Linton MF. Current perspectives on statins. Circulation. 2000;101:207–213. 13. 13Ray JG, Rosendaal F. Role of dyslipidemia and statins in venous thromboembolism. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2:165–170. 14. 14Kearney D, Fitzgerald D. The anti-thrombotic effects of statins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1305–1307.
Full-Text PDF (131 KB)
15. 15Devaraj S, Chan E, Jialal I, et al. Direct demonstration of anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4489–4496. 16. 16Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-Reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207. 17. 17Glynn RJ, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. A randomized trial of rosuvastatin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1851–1861. 18. 18Ray JG, Mamdani M, Tsuyuki RT, et al. Use of statins and the subsequent development of deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1405–1410. MEDLINE 19. 19Grady D, Wenger NK, Herrington D, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases risk for venous thromboembolic disease (The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study). Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:689–696. MEDLINE 20. 20Caine GJ, Stonelake PS, Lip GY, et al. The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate. Neoplasia. 2002;4:465–473. MEDLINE 21. 21Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110:2339–2346. 22. 22Lee AY. Epidemiology and management of venous thromboembolism in patient with cancer. Thromb Res. 2003;110:167–172. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (127 KB)
23. 23Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324:71–86. 24. 24Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Effect of low-dose aspirin on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:525–533. 25. 25Rezaie-Majd A, Maca T, Bucek RA, et al. Simvastatin reduces expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Atherioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:1194–1199. 26. 26Giurgea AG, Margeta C, Maca T, et al. Simvastatin reduces serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor in hypercholesterolemic patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:30–36. MEDLINE 27. 27Eichinger S, Pecheniuk NM, Hron G, et al. High-density lipoprotein and the risk of recurrence venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2007;115:1609–1614. 28. 28Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Szrek M, et al. Relation of characteristics of metabolic syndrome to short-term prognosis and effects of intensive statin therapy after acute coronary syndrome: an analysis of the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2508–2513. MEDLINE 29. 29Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:893–900. 30. 30Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5490–5505. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Penn Reprint requests should be addressed to Danai Khemasuwan, MD, Albert Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA 19141
Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript. Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript. PII: S0002-9343(09)00706-2 doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.025 © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|