Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 122, Issue 10, Pages 947-954 (October 2009)


View previous. 15 of 24 View next.

Inflammation and Thrombosis Biomarkers and Incident Frailty in Postmenopausal Women

Alexander P. Reiner, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Aaron K. Aragaki, MSa, Shelly L. Gray, PharmD, MSd, Jean Wactawski-Wende, PhDg, Jane A. Cauley, DrPHf, Barbara B. Cochrane, PhDae, Charles L. Kooperberg, PhDac, Nancy F. Woods, PhDe, Andrea Z. LaCroix, PhDab

published online 14 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The immune and blood coagulation systems have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the geriatric syndrome of frailty, but limited prospective data examining the relationship of clotting/inflammation biomarkers to risk of incident frailty exist.

Methods

This prospective analysis was derived from a nested case-control study within the Women's Health Initiative. Among women 65 to 79 years free of frailty at enrollment, we randomly selected 900 incident cases from those developing frailty within 3 years; 900 non-frail controls were individually matched on age, ethnicity, and blood collection date. Biomarkers assessed for risk of incident frailty included fibrinogen, factor VIII, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA).

Results

When examined by quartiles in multivariable adjusted models, higher D-dimer and t-PA levels were each associated with increased risk of frailty (P trend = .04). Relative to the lowest quartile, the odds ratios for frailty compared with the upper quartile were 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.22) for t-PA and 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.22) for D-dimer. For women having high t-PA and high D-dimer compared with women having lower levels of both biomarkers, the odds of frailty was 2.20 (1.29-3.75). There was little evidence for association between coagulation factor VIII, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, or interleukin-6 levels and incident frailty.

Conclusion

This prospective analysis supports the role of markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis as independent predictors of incident frailty in postmenopausal women.

Article Outline

Abstract

Materials and Methods

Study Sample

Definition of Frailty in Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study

Potential Confounders

Laboratory Assays

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

References

Copyright

Frailty in older adults is defined as a syndrome consisting of involuntary weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and weakness. The syndrome of frailty is associated with increased vulnerability to aging-related diseases and mortality.1, 2 The pathophysiology of frailty is not well understood, but multiple physiologic systems seem to be involved, including activation of immune/inflammation and blood coagulation systems.3

Clinical Significance


In postmenopausal women, higher levels of the coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers D-dimer and t-PA were associated with increased risk of incident frailty.

The combined effects of high D-dimer and high t-pa on risk of incident frailty were greater than the risk associated with either biomarker alone.

Markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis might serve as independent predictors of incident frailty in postmenopausal women.

In cross-sectional analyses, frailty and functional decline have been associated with increased markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and inflammation, such as factor VIII, fibrinogen, and D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complex, factor XI α1-antitrypsin, interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), total white blood count, and circulating T-lymphocytes expressing C-C chemokine receptor-5.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 In an experimental mouse model of proinflammatory pathway activation due to deficiency of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, muscle weakness and higher IL-6 levels developed more rapidly with increasing age compared with control mice.11 The connection among blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and frailty is further supported by the recent report that community-dwelling older adults with frailty are at moderately increased risk of developing idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease.12

Although most existing reports support a cross-sectional relationship between hemostasis and inflammation markers and frailty, few prospective studies have examined the ability of biomarkers measured at baseline to predict incident frailty events during follow-up. In a recent prospective analysis of the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), baseline CRP level and, to a lesser extent, white blood count and factor VIII levels were associated with an increased risk of incident frailty during follow-up.13 We examined the association of coagulation and fibrinolysis biomarkers measured at baseline enrollment and risk of incident frailty in postmenopausal women from Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study (WHI-OS). In addition to CRP, IL-6, and factor VIII, our analysis included fibrinogen, D-dimer, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), which have not previously been assessed prospectively with respect to incident frailty.

Materials and Methods 

return to Article Outline

Study Sample 

The WHI-OS is a prospective study of 93,676 women aged 50 to 79 years recruited from 1993 to 1998 from 40 clinical centers in the United States. Study details have been described.14, 15 Women were eligible for WHI-OS if they were postmenopausal, unlikely to relocate or die within 3 years, and not enrolled in any of the WHI clinical trials. The study was reviewed and approved by human subjects review committees at each participating institution. All women provided written informed consent.

The participants for the current analysis were derived from a case-control study of incident frailty nested within the WHI-OS. Women were considered eligible if they were at least 65 years old and not frail at study enrollment (see below for definition of frailty in WHI-OS), and did not report at baseline a diagnosis or disease that can manifest as frailty (Parkinson disease, severe autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, or use of antidepressant medications). Cases and controls also were excluded if they developed cardiovascular disease or cancer events during follow-up within 4 years of enrollment. A total of 25,378 WHI-OS women were eligible. Cases of frailty (n = 900) were randomly selected from the 3453 WHI-OS participants who developed incident frailty by year 3 follow-up contact. Controls (n = 900) were selected from 15,198 participants with a WHI-OS frailty score of 0 (zero) at year 3 of follow-up and were matched to cases on age (±1 year), ethnicity, and date of blood collection, using a 1:1 matching ratio.

Definition of Frailty in Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study 

The frailty phenotype developed in the WHI cohort was based on the criteria used by Fried et al1 and has been found to be strongly associated with future mortality, disability, hospitalization, and hip fracture among older women in the WHI-OS.2 Definition of the frailty phenotype in WHI was based on 5 component criteria (weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and unintended weight loss). Because physical performance measures were not available in WHI-OS, the CHS definition was modified to include the Rand-36 physical function scale,16 which was used as a self-report indicator of muscle weakness and slow walking speed. The Rand-36 Vitality Scale (range 0-100) was used to measure exhaustion using 4 items pertaining to the past 4 weeks: “Did you feel. worn out?; tired?; full of pep?; have a lot of energy?”. Low physical activity was classified using a questionnaire that assessed weekly frequency and duration of 4 speeds of walking and activities. Kilocalories of energy expended in a week on leisure time activity was calculated (metabolic equivalent task score = kcal/wk * kg). A dichotomous variable was created indicating unintentional weight loss of more than 5% of body weight in the past 2 years, based on measured weight at the baseline and 3-year clinic visits in combination with a self-reported item on whether recent weight loss was intentional at the 3-year follow-up. For each measure described above, a frailty component was classified as present if the participant had a score in the lowest quartile of the distribution for that component or unintentional weight loss. To align the scoring with the frailty measure developed in CHS, poor physical function was scored as 2 points because both the muscle strength and walking ability components were measured by this scale. We then summed the number of frailty components that were present, yielding a range of 0 to 5, and used a threshold score of ≥3 to create a dichotomous outcome of incident frailty.

Potential Confounders 

Data on demographic (race/ethnicity, age, education), medical history, and health behavior characteristics were obtained by self-report in the WHI-OS at baseline. Smoking status was classified as current, past, or never. Medical conditions at baseline included self-reported physician diagnosis of arthritis, treated diabetes, hypertension (on medication and/or blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg), cancer, Parkinson disease, autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Body mass index (BMI) was defined using measured height and weight at baseline as weight (kilograms) divided by height (meters squared). Depressive symptoms were assessed by an 8-item short form17 of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.18 Postmenopausal hormone therapy use was ascertained by interview and categorized as current, past, or never use of any estrogen with or without progestin. Other medication use was assessed by having participants bring all current medications taken on a regular basis to their first screening interview. Clinic interviewers entered each medication name and strength directly from the containers into a database that assigned drug codes using Medi-Span software (First DataBank, Inc, San Bruno, Calif). During follow-up, incident cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, definite or possible coronary death, angina, revascularization, carotid artery disease, congestive heart failure, and stroke) were ascertained, initially by annual self-report and confirmed through medical record review and adjudication by local clinic physicians and finally by a panel of central adjudicators.

Laboratory Assays 

Plasma biomarker assays were performed at the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine on aliquots of citrated plasma (fibrinogen, factor VIII, D-dimer) or EDTA plasma (CRP, IL-6, t-PA) that had been collected at a single time point during the baseline WHI examination, processed under standard protocols, and stored at −80°C. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by immunonephelometry (BNII, Dade-Behring, Deerfield, IL). Plasma fibrinogen and factor VIII activity were measured on an automated hemostasis analyzer (STA Compact; Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ) using the modified thrombin time method (Clauss assay) and 1-stage clotting time assay, respectively. For the factor VIII assay, values are reported as a percentage of normal plasma pool. Quantitative D-dimer and t-PA levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Asserachrom D-Di, Diagnostica Stago). IL-6 was measured using a commercial BioSource high-sensitivity ELISA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) according to manufacturer's instructions; the limit of detection for the IL-6 assay was 0.02 pg/mL.

Among the 1800 study participants, the number of participants with missing biomarkers values were 7 (0.4%) for fibrinogen, 7 (0.4%) for factor VIII, 7 (0.4%) for D-dimer, 8 (0.4%) for t-PA, 38 (2.1%) for IL-6, and 41 (2.3%) for CRP. A large number (847 or 47%) of participants had values below the detectable limit of the IL-6 immunoassay. One participant had a t-PA value of 153 mg/mL (>6 times higher than the next highest) and was excluded from the t-PA analyses. Eight participants (0.4%) had fibrinogen less than 100 mg/dL, and 42 participants (2.3%) had factor VIII less than 30%. To account for the possibility that some of these fibrinogen or factor VIII levels were spuriously low because of clot formation or sample degradation, we performed sensitivity analyses excluding these 50 subjects.

Statistical Analysis 

Baseline demographic, medical, and health behavior characteristics were compared for women according to quartile of biomarker levels and by case-control status. Corresponding P values were based on chi-square tests of association. Mean biomarker levels were compared between incident frailty cases and controls using paired t tests. We also visually assessed the relationship between biomarkers and risk of incident frailty by fitting generalized additive models with biomarker levels as a continuous variable (log10 scale) using splines and after adjusting for age, ethnicity, hypertension, hormone use, BMI, education, alcohol consumption, arthritis, and smoking.

To formally test the relationship between biomarkers and risk of incident frailty, conditional logistic regression, matching on case-control pairs, was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. This analytic approach, in the context of a matched case-control design, can be considered an adaptation of the Cox proportional hazards failure time model. Assessment of linear trend was approached by dividing the population into quartiles according to cut-points determined using the control distribution for each biomarker and calculating odds ratios for each quartile relative to the lowest quartile. Because of the large number of participants with undetectable IL-6 levels (<0.02 pg/mL), we performed a categoric analysis using tertiles, comparing individuals with values1.0 pg/mL and those with values between 0.02 and 1.0 pg/mL with the baseline category of<0.02 pg/mL. For each biomarker, we fit 2 covariate-adjusted regression models. Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, BMI, and matched on case-control pair (minimally adjusted model). Model 2 adjusted for these covariates and education, alcohol consumption, arthritis, and smoking, and matched on case-control pair (fully adjusted model). For any statistically significant results, a sensitivity analysis was performed by stratifying the risk of frailty according to baseline use of medications with anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant properties (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, non-statin anti-hyperlipidemics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and warfarin). In additional sensitivity analyses, we adjusted our regression models for baseline use of any sedating medication (benzodiazepines, hypnotics, opioids, antipsychotics, or neuroleptics), and all of our results were essentially unchanged.

In post hoc analyses, for each biomarker found to be individually associated with frailty (t-PA and D-dimer), we assessed whether the risk of incident frailty associated with the combination of the 2 biomarkers was greater than the risk associated with each biomarker individually. We divided participants into 4 categories: those being in the upper quartile distribution for both biomarkers, those being in the upper quartile for D-dimer, but not t-PA, those being in the upper quartile for t-PA but not D-dimer and the baseline category of being in the upper quartile for neither biomarker. A 3 degrees of freedom, chi-square test was performed to test risk differences across the 4 categories.

Results 

return to Article Outline

Of the baseline characteristics examined (Table 1), lower education, obesity, current smoking, infrequent alcohol consumption, worse health status, more depressive symptoms, diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and statin use were more common among frailty cases than controls (P ≤.01). Cross-sectional univariate analyses of baseline characteristics in the 900 non-frail control women according to quartile of plasma biomarker levels showed significant associations (P ≤.01) of age with higher D-dimer, factor VIII, and t-PA; BMI with higher CRP and t-PA; hormone therapy use with higher CRP, fibrinogen, and t-PA; hypertension with higher CRP and t-PA; and alcohol consumption with higher fibrinogen.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristic of Women's Health Initiative Observational Study Participants versus Incident Frailty

Frail CasesNon-Frail ControlsP Value
N%N%
Age group at screening, y
60-6948553.948553.91.00
70-7941546.141546.1.
Education
0-8 y121.360.7<.001
Some high school343.8171.9.
High school diploma/GED19221.513515.1.
School after high school34138.234238.2.
College degree or higher31435.239544.1.
Ethnicity
White86596.186596.11.00
Black161.8161.8.
Hispanic20.220.2.
Asian/Pacific Islander151.7151.7.
Unknown20.220.2.
BMI, kg/m2 (full categories)
Underweight (<18.5)40.4141.6<.001
Normal (18.5-24.9)27130.246151.5.
Overweight (25.0-29.9)35239.332035.8.
Obesity I (30.0-34.9)18821.0869.6.
Obesity II (35.0-39.9)556.1101.1.
Extreme obesity III (≥40)262.940.4.
Smoking
Never47252.947853.7.005
Past36040.438242.9.
Current606.7303.4.
Alcohol
Non/past drinker27230.320022.3<.001
<1 drink/wk31435.025128.0.
1-14 drinks/wk27130.240445.1.
>14 drinks/wk414.6404.5.
Hormone therapy use status
Never used37842.040044.5.48
Past user12914.313114.6.
Current user39343.736840.9.
Depressive mood
016718.732536.6<.001
1-236741.235640.1.
3-421524.115016.9.
5+14215.9576.4.
Activity of daily living disability
No86998.587899.1.27
Yes131.580.9.
Treated diabetes (pills or shots)
No86295.888898.8<.001
Yes384.2111.2.
Hypertensive
No44849.956462.7<.001
Yes45050.133637.3.
History of arthritis
No33036.752958.8<.001
Yes57063.337141.2.
History of hip fracture at age ≥55 y
No80598.982599.8.03
Yes91.120.2.
No. of falls in last 12 mo
None60567.364371.6.02
1 time17018.917119.0.
2 times819.0616.8.
≥3434.8232.6.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use
No81690.784493.8.01
Yes849.3566.2.
Non-statin antihyperlipidemic medication use
No88298.088898.7.27
Yes182.0121.3.
Statin use
No79888.783592.8.003
Yes10211.3657.2.
NSAID use
No52157.958865.3.001
Yes37942.131234.7.
Coumarin anticoagulant use
No88998.889899.8.01
Yes111.220.2.

GED=General Equivalency Diploma; BMI=body mass index; NSAID=nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

In both minimally adjusted and fully adjusted regression models, women with t-PA or D-dimer levels in the upper quartile were at increased risk of incident frailty relative to women in the lowest respective quartiles; women in the second and third quartiles were at intermediate risk (Table 2). The trend P values associated with D-dimer and t-PA were each P = .04 for the fully adjusted models. Women with IL-6 levels ≥1 pg/mL and those with detectable IL-6 levels less than 1 pg/mL had a higher risk of frailty than women with undetectable IL-6 levels in the minimally adjusted model (P = .03), but the frailty-IL-6 association became nonsignificant on further covariate adjustment (P = .27). Baseline levels of CRP, fibrinogen, and factor VIII were not significantly associated with incident frailty in either minimally or fully adjusted models. Restricting the analysis to subjects with factor VIII levels>30% and fibrinogen levels>100 did not appreciably alter these results.

Table 2.

Risk of Frailty by Quartile of Inflammation and Coagulation Biomarkers

Biomarker QuartileModel 1 Odds Ratio (95% CI)Model 2 Odds Ratio (95% CI)
C-reactive protein Q1 (<1.1 mg/L)11
C-reactive protein Q2 (1.1-2.3 mg/L)1.12(0.80-1.56)1.24(0.84-1.81)
C-reactive protein Q3 (2.3-4.8 mg/L)1.13(0.81-1.58)1.14(0.78-1.65)
C-reactive protein Q4 (≥4.8 mg/L)1.15(0.82-1.62)1.05(0.72-1.54)
P for trend0.430.95
D-dimer Q1 (<0.24 ug/mL)11
D-dimer Q2 (0.24-0.36 ug/mL)1.14(0.84-1.56)1.27(0.90-1.79)
D-dimer Q3 (0.36-0.61 ug/mL)1.10(0.81-1.49)1.05(0.75-1.48)
D-dimer Q4 (≥0.61 ug/mL)1.37(1.00-1.88)1.57(1.11-2.22)
P for trend0.070.04
Factor VIII Q1 (<64%)11
Factor VIII Q2 (64%-90%)1.22(0.90-1.64)1.17(0.84-1.64)
Factor VIII Q3 (90%-116%)1.05(0.76-1.44)1.05(0.74-1.48)
Factor VIII Q4 (≥116%)1.02(0.73-1.42)1.10(0.76-1.59)
P for trend0.720.84
Fibrinogen Q1 (<261 mg/dL)11
Fibrinogen Q2 (261-305 mg/dL)0.71(0.52-0.97)0.70(0.49-1.00)
Fibrinogen Q3 (305-352 mg/dL)0.91(0.66-1.25)0.96(0.67-1.36)
Fibrinogen Q4 (≥352 mg/dL)0.95(0.69-1.31)0.93(0.64-1.34)
P for trend0.790.80
Tissue plasminogen activator Q1 (<6 mg/mL)11
Tissue plasminogen activator Q2 (6-8 mg/mL)1.14(0.83-1.57)1.23(0.87-1.75)
Tissue plasminogen activator Q3 (8-10.3 mg/mL)1.10(0.80-1.51)1.20(0.84-1.72)
Tissue plasminogen activator Q4 (≥10.3 mg/mL)1.48(1.05-2.07)1.52(1.05-2.22)
P for trend0.030.04
Interleukin-6 (0 pg/mL)11
Interleukin-6 (0<1 pg/mL)1.07(0.74-1.54)0.97(0.64-1.45)
Interleukin-6 (≥1 pg/mL)1.41(1.00-1.98)1.20(0.82-1.76)
P for trend0.030.27

CI=confidence interval.

Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, and BMI.

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 covariates+education, alcohol consumption, hypertension, arthritis, and smoking.

Additional sensitivity analyses were performed by stratifying the fully adjusted frailty-biomarker models for D-dimer and t-PA according to baseline use of any anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant medication, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, non-statin anti-hyperlipidemics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and warfarin. The frailty odds ratios by quartile of biomarker level were similar to those described above. For example, among the 936 participants (52%) not using anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant medications, the frailty odds ratio for the highest quartile of D-dimer was 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.91) compared with women in the lowest quartile of D-dimer. Similarly, among non-medication users, the frailty odds ratio associated with the highest quartile of tPA was 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.50) compared with women in the lowest quartile of t-PA. There was no significant interaction between either D-dimer or t-PA and anti-inflammatory/anticoagulant medication use on risk of frailty (P values for interaction = .47 and .42, respectively).

Because D-dimer and t-PA measure different aspects of the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis pathways, and circulating levels were uncorrelated with one another among non-frail WHI-OS controls (Spearman's r = −0.04), we also explored whether the combination of high D-dimer and high t-PA levels was associated with a greater risk of frailty compared with each biomarker individually (Table 3). In the fully adjusted regression model, women in the upper quartile for t-PA had only a 1.3-fold increased risk of frailty and women in the upper quartile for D-dimer had only a 1.4-fold increased risk of frailty, compared with women with low levels of both markers. For women in the upper quartile of both t-PA and D-dimer, the risk of incident frailty was even larger (odds ratio, 2.2). Although there was some overlap in the confidence intervals for these risk estimates, the combined effect of t-PA and D-dimer levels on risk frailty was significantly greater than the effect of each biomarker individually (P = .02).

Table 3.

Risk of Frailty Comparing Levels of D-dimer and Tissue Plasminogen Activator in the Upper Range of the Distribution

Biomarker QuartileModel 1 Odds Ratio (95% CI)Model 2 Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Neither D-dimer nor t-PA in the upper quartile11
Only t-PA in the upper quartile1.38(1.05-1.82)1.29(0.94-1.76)
Only D-dimer in the upper quartile1.30(0.97-1.74)1.38(0.99-1.91)
Both D-dimer and t-PA in the upper quartile1.90(1.17-3.08)2.20(1.29-3.75)
Overall P value(3 df test).02.02

CI=confidence interval; t-PA=tissue plasminogen activator.

Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, and BMI.

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 covariates+education, alcohol consumption, hypertension, arthritis, and smoking.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

In a nested case-control study of incident frailty in postmenopausal women, higher levels of the coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers D-dimer and t-PA were each associated with increased risk of frailty at 3-year follow-up. The associations between frailty and D-dimer or t-PA were independent of the potential confounding effects of comorbid conditions and lifestyle factors that also are associated with increased coagulation and inflammation biomarkers levels and frailty. To our knowledge, a prospective association between D-dimer and t-PA and incident frailty have not been reported. Moreover, the combined effects of high D-dimer and high t-PA on risk of incident frailty were greater than the risk associated with either biomarker alone. The risks of frailty associated with D-dimer and t-PA were not modified by baseline use of medications with anticoagulant or anti-inflammatory properties. Finally, we observed little evidence for association between coagulation factor VIII, fibrinogen, CRP, or IL-6 levels and development of frailty.

Studies of older adults consistently support associations between markers of thrombosis and inflammation and measures of disability, physical performance, or frailty.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 However, most previous studies assessing the outcome of frailty were cross-sectional analyses, in which the temporal relationships underlying the observed associations are more difficult to tease apart. To our knowledge, there has been one other prospective analysis examining the relationship of biomarkers measured at baseline to development of incident frailty during follow-up in CHS.13 In the report by Barzilay et al,13 CRP and insulin resistance were associated with increased risk of incident frailty in CHS independently of potential confounders, whereas coagulation factor VIII levels had a borderline significant association. The lack of association between CRP and incident frailty in the WHI-OS might reflect differences in gender or other study population characteristics between women from WHI compared with men and women from CHS. D-dimer and t-PA were not evaluated in the analysis of incident frailty by Barzilay et al,13 although higher D-dimer levels were previously reported to be increased with baseline frailty in a cross-sectional analysis from CHS.5 Therefore, additional prospective studies of older adults are required to confirm the role of D-dimer and t-PA as independent risk factors for incident frailty.

D-dimer results from fibrin formation and degradation, and is a marker of activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems. Fibrinolytic activity is largely regulated by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) released from endothelial cells and by a circulating inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. t-PA antigen measures free, active t-PA, and t-PA complexed to plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. Therefore, t-PA and D-dimer each summarize different components of the coagulation/fibrinolytic systems. Both t-PA antigen and D-dimer levels increase with age19, 20 and have been reported to predict future venous thromboembolic21 and arterial thrombotic events22, 23 independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Together with a recent report that frailty predicts increased risk of idiopathic venous thrombotic events,12 the current WHI findings support a possible pathophysiologic connection among aging, activation of the blood coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, and occurrence of frailty. The association between D-dimer and t-PA and development of frailty in postmenopausal women from WHI was present in women without clinical cardiovascular disease, because women with overt cardiovascular disease were excluded from our analyses. Because frailty has been correlated with the extent of underlying atherosclerotic disease,24 studies that include subclinical noninvasive measures of vascular disease are needed to more accurately assess the interrelationships among coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers, vascular disease, and frailty.

Frailty has been conceptualized as a pathophysiologic state of global functional decline characterized by increased vulnerability to acute and chronic physical and psychosocial stressors due to impaired homeostatic mechanisms. Acute or chronic stress contributes to activation of the coagulation system and impaired fibrinolysis, including increases in circulating levels of D-dimer and t-PA.25, 26, 27, 28 Therefore, D-dimer and t-PA might hasten the clinical transition to frailty or other aging-related disorders in susceptible older individuals who experience sustained or repeated physical or psychosocial trauma, stress, injury, or “allostatic load.”29 Strengths of the current study include the use of a prospective study design in which we assessed incident cases of frailty that occurred subsequent to measurement of the biomarkers. Although we excluded women with chronic diseases that manifest as frailty and also performed sensitivity analyses according to use of medications with anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant properties, we cannot fully exclude the possibility that residual confounding due to unmeasured factors, such as subclinical atherosclerosis,24 might account for the observed frailty-biomarker associations. Because our study population comprised postmenopausal women of predominantly white race, whether the associations with t-PA and D-dimer with incident frailty are generalizable to men and other ethnic groups also requires additional study.

Other study limitations include the relatively short follow-up duration and lack of objective physical performance measurements of muscle weakness and walking speed, which may be prone to error. Nonetheless, our “modified definition” of frailty has been validated previously through strong association with future mortality, disability, hospitalization, and hip fracture events among older women in the WHI-OS.2 Because of assay and plasma specimen issues that we were not able to fully resolve, a sizeable proportion of our study participants had undetectable IL-6 levels; thus, our ability to assess the risk of frailty with IL-6 was limited, and longitudinal assessment of IL-6 in other frail populations is warranted.

Conclusions 

return to Article Outline

Plasma levels of D-dimer and t-PA, 2 markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis, were associated prospectively with risk of incident frailty in postmenopausal women. These findings support the role of activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in the pathophysiology and occurrence of frailty in older adults. If these results are confirmed in other study populations, screening of D-dimer and t-PA may be useful for identifying otherwise healthy older individuals at risk for developing frailty or other functional consequences of aging.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56A:M146–M156.

2. 2Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, et al. Frailty: emergence and consequences in women ages 65 and older in The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1321–1330. MEDLINE | CrossRef

3. 3Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:991–1001. MEDLINE | CrossRef

4. 4Cohen HJ, Harris T, Pieper CF. Coagulation and activation of inflammatory pathways in the development of functional decline and mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 2003;114:180–187. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (115 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Walston J, McBurnie MA, Newman A, et al.Cardiovascular Health Study Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2333–2341. MEDLINE | CrossRef

6. 6Ferrucci L, Harris TB, Guralnik JM, et al. Serum IL-6 and the development of disability in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:639–646. MEDLINE

7. 7Ferrucci L, Penninx BW, Volpato S, et al. Change in muscle strength explains accelerated decline of physical function in older women with high interleukin-6 serum levels. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1947–1954. MEDLINE | CrossRef

8. 8Penninx BW, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, et al. Inflammatory markers and incident mobility limitation in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1105–1113. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9Leng SX, Xue QL, Tian J, et al. Inflammation and frailty in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:864–871. MEDLINE | CrossRef

10. 10De Fanis U, Wang GC, Fedarko NS, Walston JD, Casolaro V, Leng SX. T-lymphocytes expressing CC chemokine receptor-5 are increased in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:904–908. CrossRef

11. 11Walston J, Fedarko N, Yang H, et al. The physical and biological characterization of a frail mouse model. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:391–398.

12. 12Folsom AR, Boland LL, Cushman M, et al. Frailty and risk of venous thromboembolism in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:79–82. MEDLINE

13. 13Barzilay JI, Blaum C, Moore T, et al. Insulin resistance and inflammation as precursors of frailty: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:635–641. MEDLINE | CrossRef

14. 14Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, et al. The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 suppl):S107–S121. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (134 KB) | CrossRef

15. 15Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational Study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:61–109. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (397 KB) | CrossRef

16. 16Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217–227. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Tuunainen A, Langer RD, Klauber MR, Kripke DF. Short version of the CES-D (Burnam screen) for depression in reference to the structured psychiatric interview. Psychiatry Res. 2001;103:261–270. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (103 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

19. 19Mari D, Coppola R, Provenzano R. Hemostasis factors and aging. Exp Gerontol. 2008;43:66–73. CrossRef

20. 20Rumley A, Emberson JR, Wannamethee SG, et al. Effects of older age on fibrin D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and other hemostatic and inflammatory variables in men aged 60-79 years. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:982–987. MEDLINE | CrossRef

21. 21Cushman M, Folsom AR, Wang L, et al. Fibrin fragment D-dimer and the risk of future venous thrombosis. Blood. 2003;101:1243–1248. MEDLINE | CrossRef

22. 22Lowe GD, Danesh J, Lewington S, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator antigen and coronary heart disease (Prospective study and meta-analysis). Eur Heart J. 2004;25:252–259. CrossRef

23. 23Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, et al. Fibrin D-dimer and coronary heart disease: prospective study and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2001;103:2323–2327.

24. 24Newman AB, Gottdiener JS, Mcburnie MA, et al.Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group Associations of subclinical cardiovascular disease with frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M158–M166. MEDLINE

25. 25Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY. A systematic review of the effects of acute psychological stress and physical activity on haemorheology, coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet reactivity: implications for the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Res. 2007;120:819–847. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (300 KB) | CrossRef

26. 26von Känel R, Dimsdale JE, Mills PJ, et al. Effect of Alzheimer caregiving stress and age on frailty markers interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:963–969. MEDLINE

27. 27Mausbach BT, von Känel R, Aschbacher K, et al. Spousal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease show longitudinal increases in plasma level of tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen. Psychosom Med. 2007;69:816–822. CrossRef

28. 28Matys T, Pawlak R, Matys E, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator promotes the effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on the amygdala and anxiety-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:16345–16350. MEDLINE | CrossRef

29. 29McEwen BS. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583:174–185. CrossRef

a Women's Health Initiative Clinical Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash

b Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

c Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

d Geriatric Pharmacy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

e School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

f Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Penn

g Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests should be addressed to Alexander P. Reiner, MD, Department of Epidemiology, Box 357236, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

 Funding: The Women's Health Initiative program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services. A full listing of Women's Health Initiative investigators can be found at http://www.whiscience.org/publications/WHI_investigators_shortlist.pdf. This article was supported by grant R01 AG025441 to Dr LaCroix from the National Institute of Aging.

 Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript.

 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(09)00539-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.016


View previous. 15 of 24 View next.