The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 10 , Pages 961.e1-961.e6, October 2009

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea on the Internet: Randomized Trial

  • Kevin O. Hwang, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Kevin O. Hwang, MD, MPH, 6410 Fannin St, UPB 1100.41, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • Abdurrahman M. Hamadah, BS

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
  • ,
  • Craig W. Johnson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston
  • ,
  • Eric J. Thomas, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
    • The University of Texas at Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • ,
  • G. Ken Goodrick, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
  • ,
  • Elmer V. Bernstam, MD, MSE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
    • The University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston

Abstract 

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea is underdiagnosed. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to promote obstructive sleep apnea screening among members of an Internet weight-loss community.

Methods

Members of an Internet weight-loss community who have never been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea or discussed the condition with their healthcare provider were randomized to intervention (online risk assessment+feedback) or control. The primary outcome was discussing obstructive sleep apnea with a healthcare provider at 12 weeks.

Results

Of 4700 members who were sent e-mail study announcements, 168 (97% were female, age 39.5 years [standard deviation 11.7], body mass index 30.3 [standard deviation 7.8]) were randomized to intervention (n=84) or control (n=84). Of 82 intervention subjects who completed the risk assessment, 50 (61%) were low risk and 32 (39%) were high risk for obstructive sleep apnea. Intervention subjects were more likely than control subjects to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider within 12 weeks (11% [9/84] vs 2% [2/84]; P=.02; relative risk=4.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-20.21). The number needed to treat was 12. High-risk intervention subjects were more likely than control subjects to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider (19% [6/32] vs 2% [2/84]; P=.004; relative risk=7.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-37.02). One high-risk intervention subject started treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Conclusion

An online screening intervention is feasible and likely effective in encouraging members of an Internet weight-loss community to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider.

Keywords: Internet, Obesity, Obstructive sleep apnea, Screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding: The study was supported in part by the Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (a National Center for Research Resources, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award program), and the Medical School Summer Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

 Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript.

 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(09)00491-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.031

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 10 , Pages 961.e1-961.e6, October 2009