The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 10, Supplement , Pages S22-S32, October 2009

Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: An Overview of Recent Guidelines

  • Alec B. O'Connor, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Alec B. O'Connor, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Box MED/HMD, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, New York 14642
  • ,
  • Robert H. Dworkin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA

Abstract 

A number of different treatments for neuropathic pain have been studied, but the literature is sizable, rapidly evolving, and lacks important information about practical aspects of patient management. Under the auspices of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG), a consensus process was used to develop evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain that take into account clinical efficacy, adverse effects, impact on health-related quality of life, convenience, and costs. On the basis of randomized clinical trials, medications recommended as first-line treatments for neuropathic pain included certain antidepressants (i.e., tricyclic antidepressants and dual reuptake inhibitors of both serotonin and norepinephrine), calcium channel α2-δ ligands (i.e., gabapentin and pregabalin), and topical lidocaine. Opioid analgesics and tramadol were recommended as second-line treatments that can be considered for first-line use in selected clinical circumstances. Other medications that generally would be used as third-line treatments include certain other antidepressant and antiepileptic medications, topical capsaicin, mexiletine, and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists. Two other national and international associations recently published pharmacologic treatment guidelines for neuropathic pain, which are summarized and contrasted with the NeuPSIG recommendations. Recent guidelines for the use of neurostimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain also are summarized. For all treatments for neuropathic pain, long-term studies, head-to-head comparisons, and studies of treatment combinations are a priority for future research.

Keywords: Evidence-based recommendations, Neuropathic pain, Pharmacologic management, Randomized clinical trials

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. O'Connor has received support from the Mayday Fund, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Dworkin has received support from the NIH and the US Veterans Administration (VA). He is a Special Government Employee of the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (FDA CDER).

 Statement of author disclosure: Please see the Author Disclosures section at the end of this article.

PII: S0002-9343(09)00396-9

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.007

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 10, Supplement , Pages S22-S32, October 2009