Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 122, Issue 8, Pages 747-753 (August 2009)


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.

Diagnostic Criteria for Atrophic Rhinosinusitis

Tran H. Ly, MDa, Richard D. deShazo, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jake Olivier, PhDbc, Scott P. Stringer, MDd, William Daley, MDe, Christopher M. Stodard, MScf

published online 19 June 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Patients with atrophic rhinosinusitis have intractable upper airway symptoms that result from loss of the normal nasal epithelium. There is no consensus on how to diagnose this condition, and diagnostic criteria are not available to perform multicenter treatment trials. We sought to establish diagnostic criteria for atrophic rhinosinusitis.

Methods

Twenty-two patients for whom there was a consensus on the diagnosis of atrophic rhinosinusitis were compared with a control group of 22 randomly selected patients with garden-variety chronic rhinosinusitis. Medical records were reviewed on all patients and clinical data were tabulated. Clinical variables included the presence of nasal obstruction, epistaxis, anosmia, purulence, crusting, chronic inflammatory disease involving the upper airway, and multiple sinus surgeries.

Results

Both groups had similar degrees of persistent nasal obstruction (82% vs 77%). The other 6 clinical features occurred more frequently in patients with atrophic rhinosinusitis than controls (P <.05). Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and recurrent nasal purulence had a 25-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-221.7) increased probability, those with recurrent epistaxis had a 12-fold increased probability (95% CI, 1.3-106.8), and those with 2 or more sinus surgeries had a 15-fold (95% CI, 3.5-66.7) increased probability of having atrophic rhinosinusitis. As the number of symptoms increased, there was an increasing probability of the predetermined diagnosis of atrophic rhinosinusitis (P <.05). The presence of chronic rhinosinusitis and any 2 of the 6 clinical features for 6 months or longer resulted in a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.77 for the diagnosis of atrophic rhinosinusitis.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of the common secondary form of atrophic rhinosinusitis may be made with certainty if a patient with chronic rhinosinusitis demonstrates 2 or more clinical features for 6 months and longer. These features are patient-reported recurrent epistaxis or episodic anosmia; or physician-documented nasal purulence, nasal crusting, chronic inflammatory disease of the upper airway, or 2 or more sinus surgeries.

a Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson

b NSW Injury Risk Management Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

c School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

d Department of Otolaryngology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson

e Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson

f School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson

Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Richard D. deShazo, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216-4505

 Funding: None.

 Conflict of Interest: None.

 Authorship: The authors each had access to the data and a role in writing this manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(09)00334-9

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.025


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.

Advertisement