Significance of Cardiac Computed Tomography Incidental Findings in Acute Chest Pain
Abstract
Background
Coronary computed tomography angiography might improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain; however, noncoronary incidental findings are frequently detected. The prevalence and clinical significance of these findings have not been well described.
Methods
Consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and inconclusive initial evaluation between May 2005 and May 2007 underwent 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography before hospital admission with noncoronary incidental findings immediately reported. An expert panel adjudicated which incidental findings changed in-hospital patient management, and projections for additional testing were based on standard medical practice.
Results
Among 395 patients (37.0% were female, mean age 53 ± 12 years), incidental findings were detected in 44.8% (n = 177): noncalcified pulmonary nodules (n = 94, 23.8%), simple liver cysts (n = 26, 6.6%), calcified pulmonary nodules (n = 16, 4.1%), and contrast-enhancing liver lesions (n = 9, 2.3%). In-hospital management was changed because of incidental finding reporting in 5 patients (1.3%), and a potential alternative diagnosis was offered in another 16 patients (4.1%). Subsequent diagnostic imaging tests were recommended in 81 patients (20.5%), including 74 chest computed tomography scans. After 6 months, biopsy was performed in 3 patients, revealing cancer in 2 (0.5%) who underwent successful tumor resection.
Conclusion
Clinically important findings are detected in up to 5% of patients with a lead symptom of acute chest pain and low to intermediate likelihood of acute coronary syndrome, but only few directly change patient management; 21% are recommended for further imaging tests, resulting in invasive procedures and detection of cancer in few patients.
Keywords: Chest pain, Computed tomography, Incidental findings
Funding: Dr Lehman is supported by grants from the National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Royal Australian College of Physicians.
Conflict of Interest: None.
Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing.
PII: S0002-9343(08)01263-1
doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.039
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

