Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages 672-678 (July 2009)


View previous. 16 of 27 View next.

White/Black Racial Differences in Risk of End-stage Renal Disease and Death

Andy I. Choi, MD, MASacCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Rudolph A. Rodriguez, MDb, Peter Bacchetti, PhDc, Daniel Bertenthal, MPHd, German T. Hernandez, MDe, Ann M. O'Hare, MD, MAb

Abstract 

Background

End-stage renal disease disproportionately affects black persons, but it is unknown when in the course of chronic kidney disease racial differences arise. Understanding the natural history of racial differences in kidney disease may help guide efforts to reduce disparities.

Methods

We compared white/black differences in the risk of end-stage renal disease and death by level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline in a national sample of 2,015,891 veterans between 2001 and 2005.

Results

Rates of end-stage renal disease among black patients exceeded those among white patients at all levels of baseline eGFR. The adjusted hazard ratios for end-stage renal disease associated with black versus white race for patients with an eGFR ≥90, 60-89, 45-59, 30-44, 15-29, and <15 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively, were 2.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-2.65), 2.30 (95% CI, 2.02-2.61), 3.08 (95% CI, 2.74-3.46), 2.47 (95% CI, 2.26-2.70), 1.86 (95% CI, 1.75-1.98), and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.12-1.34). We observed a similar pattern for mortality, with equal or higher rates of death among black persons at all levels of eGFR. The highest risk of mortality associated with black race also was observed among those with an eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73m2 (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI, 1.27-1.36).

Conclusion

Racial differences in the risk of end-stage renal disease appear early in the course of kidney disease and are not explained by a survival advantage among blacks. Efforts to identify and slow progression of chronic kidney disease at earlier stages may be needed to reduce racial disparities.

a Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, Calif

b Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle

c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, Calif

d VA Research Enhancement Award Program, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif

e Department of Medicine, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso

Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Andy I. Choi, MD, MAS, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Box 111J, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121

 Funding: This study was supported by a fellowship grant from the National Kidney Foundation, grants from the National Institutes of Health (K23DK080645-01A1, K23AG028980-03, R01AI069952-03), W.K. Kellogg Scholars in Health Disparities Program, Paso del Norte Health Foundation's Center for Border Health Research, and the San Francisco VA Research Enhancement Award Program to Improve Care for Older Veterans. These funding sources had no involvement in the design or execution of this study.

 Conflict of Interest: GTH has received research support from the Catholic Healthcare West, Genentech, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; he has received honoraria from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and Novartis. AMO receives royalties from UpToDate and research funding from the Centers for Disease Control. These funding sources played no role in the research presented here. The other authors declare no potential financial conflicts of interest.

 Authorship: AIC, AMO, and DB had access to the data; all authors had a role in writing the manuscript.

PII: S0002-9343(08)01258-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.11.021


View previous. 16 of 27 View next.

Advertisement