« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 2
, Pages
152-161
, February 2009
The Impact of Revascularization on Mortality in Patients with Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease
-
Comparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for overall mortality. All included studies are shown by name along with point estimates of the OR and respective 95% CIs. The size of t
Comparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for overall mortality. All included studies are shown by name along with point estimates of the OR and respective 95% CIs. The size of the squares denoting the point estimate in each study is proportional to the weight of the study. The study by Hambrecht et al27 is not included because there were no mortalities in either the revascularization or medical therapy groups.
-
Comparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for overall mortality, stratified by revascularization modality: coronary artery bypass surgery (A) and percutaneous coronary interventiComparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for overall mortality, stratified by revascularization modality: coronary artery bypass surgery (A) and percutaneous coronary intervention (B). Interpretation of OR plot as in Figure 1.
-
Comparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for nonfatal myocardial infarction. Interpretation of OR plot as in Figure 1.Comparison of coronary revascularization versus medical therapy for nonfatal myocardial infarction. Interpretation of OR plot as in Figure 1.
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this article.
Authorship: All authors had access to the data and were involved as follows: Conception (AJ, TKR, LG, DLB); statistical analysis (AJ, SK, DLB); writing of article (AJ, DLB); critical review (AJ, SK, TKR, LG, DLB).
PII: S0002-9343(08)00955-8
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.07.027
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 122, Issue 2
, Pages
152-161
, February 2009

