The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 121, Issue 5 , Pages 358-359 , May 2008

Can Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Replace Noninvasive Functional Stress Testing?

  • Pui-Wai Lee, MBChB
  • ,
  • Patricia A. Pellikka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Patricia A. Pellikka, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

References 

  1. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina) (ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina)). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:159–168
  2. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? (A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance). JAMA. 1998;280:913–920
  3. Kim C, Kwok YS, Heagerty P, Redberg R. Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2001;142:934–944
  4. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896–1910
  5. Brosh D, Higano ST, Lennon RJ, et al. Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Am Heart J. 2005;150:338–343
  6. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:819–824
  7. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508–2514
  8. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, et al. The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:661–669
  9. McCully RB, Roger VL, Ommen SR, et al. Outcomes of patients with reduced exercise capacity at time of exercise echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:750–757
  10. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, et al. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:227–237
  11. Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:1021–1041
  12. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:62–70
  13. Mann JM, Davies MJ. Vulnerable plaque (Relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries). Circulation. 1996;94:928–931
  14. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319–326
  15. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863–871
  16. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1059–1067

PII: S0002-9343(08)00076-4

doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.10.041

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 121, Issue 5 , Pages 358-359 , May 2008