The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46 , January 2007

A Comparison of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care at Academic and Nonacademic Hospitals

  • Manesh R. Patel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Anita Y. Chen, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • E. Magnus Ohman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • L. Kristin Newby, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Robert A. Harrington, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Sydney C. Smith Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • W. Brian Gibler, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • ,
  • James E. Calvin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
  • ,
  • Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH, P.O. Box 17969, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705.

References 

  1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation. 2002;106:1893–1900
  2. Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, et al. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993) (Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1994;90:2103–2114
  3. Burwen DR, Galusha DH, Lewis JM, et al. National and state trends in quality of care for acute myocardial infarction between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999: the Medicare health care quality improvement program. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1430–1439
  4. Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of care. JAMA. 1992;268:1709–1714
  5. Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, et al. Do “America’s Best Hospitals” perform better for acute myocardial infarction?. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:286–292
  6. Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, et al. Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. JAMA. 2000;284:1256–1262
  7. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina) [erratum appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:294-295]). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:970–1062
  8. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22
  9. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001;
  10. Berwick DM. A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘Quality Chasm’ report. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:80–90
  11. Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1147–1156
  12. Tran CT, Lee DS, Flintoft VF, et al. CCORT/CCS quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction care. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19:38–45
  13. Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:243–254
  14. Pelliccia F, Cartoni D, Verde M, et al. Comparison of presenting features, diagnostic tools, hospital outcomes, and quality of care indicators in older (>65 years) to younger, men to women, and diabetics to nondiabetics with acute chest pain triaged in the emergency department. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:216–219
  15. Perschbacher JM, Reeder GS, Jacobsen SJ, et al. Evidence-based therapies for myocardial infarction: secular trends and determinants of practice in the community. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:983–991
  16. Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, et al. Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1443–1449
  17. Mehta RH, Stalhandske EJ, McCargar PA, et al. Elderly patients at highest risk with acute myocardial infarction are more frequently transferred from community hospitals to tertiary centers: reality or myth?. Am Heart J. 1999;138:688–695
  18. Garg PP, Landrum MB, Normand SL, et al. Understanding individual and small area variation in the underuse of coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction. Med Care. 2002;40:614–626
  19. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, et al. Timeliness and quality of care for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction under health maintenance organization vs fee-for-service insurance. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2013–2020
  20. Brown AF, Gross AG, Gutierrez PR, et al. Income-related differences in the use of evidence-based therapies in older persons with diabetes mellitus in for-profit managed care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:665–670
  21. Rao SV, Kaul P, Newby LK, et al. Poverty, process of care, and outcome in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1948–1954

 CRUSADE is a National Quality Improvement Initiative of the Duke Clinical Research Institute. CRUSADE is funded by the Schering-Plough Corporation. The Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership provides additional funding support. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. also funded this research.

PII: S0002-9343(06)01254-X

doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.10.008

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46 , January 2007