The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 33-39, January 2007

Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract 

Purpose

To assess the effects of socioeconomic status on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Material and Methods

We studied a retrospective cohort of 5622 patients who presented to a hospital emergency department with an initial episode of acute myocardial infarction between April 1998 and March 2002 in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Our main outcome measure was 1-year all-cause mortality following the index emergency department visit; we used socioeconomic status (measured by neighborhood median household income) as our main predictor after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics and revascularization.

Results

Socioeconomic status profoundly affected the rate of emergency department presentation and the process and outcome of acute myocardial infarction care. In patients belonging to the lowest versus the highest socioeconomic status quartile, the risk of presenting to the emergency department was 72% higher (P <.001); at 1 year, revascularization was lower (36% vs 48%, P <.001), and mortality higher (19.1% vs 9.1%, P <.001). Socioeconomic status was independently associated with 1-year mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics and 1-year revascularization, and socioeconomic status was especially influential in non-revascularized patients.

Conclusions

Given the influence of socioeconomic status on mortality after acute myocardial infarction and the key role of revascularization in modulating this relationship, our study has important implications for access to and process of cardiac care.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, Socioeconomic status, Emergency department, Revascularization

 

 This study was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. Although the study is based in part on data provided by Alberta Health and Wellness, the interpretation and conclusions contained herein are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Alberta. Neither the Government nor Alberta Health and Wellness express any opinion in relation to this study.

PII: S0002-9343(06)00693-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.056

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1 , Pages 33-39, January 2007