« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1
, Pages 72-82.e3
, January 2007
Self-Managed Long-Term Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Therapy: The Balance of Benefits and Harms
References
- Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest. 2001;119:176S–193S
- A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:677–681
- Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:682–687
- Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1676–1681
- Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest. 2001;119:8S–21S
- Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:631–639
- Van der Heijden JF, Hutten BA, Buller HR, Prins MH. Vitamin K antagonist or low-molecular-weight heparin for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002: The Cochrane Library, 2002;(1):CD002001. Available at: www.cochrane.org.
- Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1729–1735
- . Low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfarin for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:521–526
- Venographic comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with oral anticoagulant therapy in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:283–290
- . Lrezidivporphylaxe nach phlebothrombose—orale antikoagulation oder niedermolekulares heparin subkutan [Low molecular with heparin versus coumarin in the prevention of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis]. VASOMED. 1998;10:133–136
- Low molecular weight heparin versus acenocoumarol in the secondary prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81:26–31
- Low molecular weight heparin versus oral anticoagulants in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:77–90
- Low molecular weight heparin versus warfarin in the prevention of recurrences after deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1994;72:191–197
- Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus oral anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: a randomized trial. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:559–564
- Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:146–153
- . Primary and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparins: prolonged thromboprophylaxis, an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:473–481
- . Home-LITE: safety and efficacy results for a study investigating the long-term out-of-hospital treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis using subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 2001;(Suppl):OC1647
- The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaborations. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694
- . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1987–1991
- Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:781–788
- Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:830–831
- Optimal therapeutic level of heparin therapy in patients with venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(8):1589–1595
- The weight-based heparin nomogram compared with a ‘standard care’ nomogram: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:874–881
- Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001;119:64S–94S
- Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:342–345
- . Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:657–662
- . Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg. 1972;104:134–144
- The diagnosis of acute, recurrent, deep-vein thrombosis: a diagnostic challenge. Circulation. 1983;67:901–906
- Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:891–899
- . Value of the ventilation-perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
- . Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:227–232
- Pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism: indications, techniques, and results in 367 patients. Am Heart J. 1971;81:175–185
- Warfarin sodium versus low-dose heparin in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:855–858
- Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:975–982
- Adjusted subcutaneous heparin versus warfarin sodium in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:189–194
- Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1109–1114
- . Long-term out-of-hospital treatment with low-molecular weight heparin versus warfarin sodium: a randomized trial comparing the quality of life associated with these antithrombotic therapies. Blood. 2001;98:267A
- . A randomized trial evaluating long-term low-molecular-weight heparin therapy out-of-hospital versus warfarin sodium comparing the post-phlebitic outcomes at three months. Blood. 2001;98:447A
- . Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–526
- . Metan—an alternative meta-analysis command. Stata Tech Bull. 1998;44:4–15
- . Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1695–1702
- Fondaparinux or enoxaparin for the initial treatment of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:867–873
- Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip replacement. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2191–2196
- Comparison of the antithrombotic and hemorrhagic effects of heparin and a new low molecular weight heparin in the rat. Haemostasis. 1985;15:324–330
- The relationship between the hemorrhagic and antithrombotic properties of low molecular weight heparins and heparin. Blood. 1982;59:1239–1245
- . Low-molecular-weight heparin in the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:674–680
- . Low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfarin for secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Med. 2001;111:130–139
- Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:1–10
- Long-term LMWH versus usual-care in proximal-vein thrombosis patients with cancer. Am J Med. 2006;119:1062–1072
The study was supported by a Medical Research Council (now Canadian Institutes for Health Research) and Industry grant (Leo Pharmaceutical Products Ltd A/S of Denmark). Additional funding was provided by Pharmion and Dupont Pharmaceuticals. Leo provided study drug and drug safety monitoring. The funding organization(s) and sponsor(s) did not have a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation or approval of the article.
Study design table and participating sites appendix available online.
PII: S0002-9343(06)00507-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.030
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 120, Issue 1
, Pages 72-82.e3
, January 2007

