The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 117, Issue 9 , Pages 643-649, 1 November 2004

Effectiveness of glucosamine for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: Results from an internet-based randomized double-blind controlled trial

  • Timothy McAlindon, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Rheumatology (TM, MF), Tufts–New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Timothy McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Tufts–New England Medical Center, Box 406, 750 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
  • ,
  • Margaret Formica, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Rheumatology (TM, MF), Tufts–New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Michael LaValley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit (ML, ML, KK), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Melissa Lehmer, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit (ML, ML, KK), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Karim Kabbara, MCIS

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit (ML, ML, KK), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 15 August 2003; accepted 10 June 2004.

Purpose

To present the safety and effectiveness results of a prototypical 12-week, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial of glucosamine among subjects with knee osteoarthritis who were recruited and followed entirely over the Internet.

Methods

The study comprised 205 subjects aged 45 years or older with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who were recruited over the Internet; eligibility was authenticated through medical record review. Participants were assigned randomly to 1.5 g/d of glucosamine (n = 101) or placebo (n = 104), of whom 108 completed the intervention (93 in each arm). The primary outcome measure was the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (Likert version). Additional outcome measures included the physical function and stiffness subscales and overall score of the questionnaire, and analgesic use.

Results

There was no difference between treatment and control groups in terms of change in pain score (2.0 ± 3.4 vs. 2.5 ± 3.8, P = 0.41), stiffness (0.7 ± 1.6 vs. 0.8 ± 1.5, P = 0.52), physical function (5.2 ± 9.5 vs. 4.6 ± 9.6, P = 0.49), overall score (7.8 ± 13.1 vs. 7.8 ± 13.5, P = 0.81), and analgesic use (133 ± 553 vs. –88 ± 755, P = 0.12). Stratification by osteoarthritis severity, glucosamine product, and use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, as well as exclusion of opiate users, did not alter the results. The number and type of adverse events reported was similar between the groups.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that although glucosamine appears to be safe, it is no more effective than placebo in treating the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.

 

 This study was supported by a grant from the Arthritis Foundation and through support from the National Library of Medicine (LM06856).

PII: S0002-9343(04)00477-2

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.023

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 117, Issue 9 , Pages 643-649, 1 November 2004