The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 117, Issue 9 , Pages 657-664, 1 November 2004

Sex- and age-related differences in the prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with angiographic coronary artery disease

  • Lillian L.C. Khor, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah (LLCK, JBM, JFC, JLA), Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Joseph B. Muhlestein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah (LLCK, JBM, JFC, JLA), Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • John F. Carlquist, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah (LLCK, JBM, JFC, JLA), Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Benjamin D. Horne, MStat, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
  • ,
  • Tami L. Bair

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
  • ,
  • Chloe A. Maycock, RN

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
  • ,
  • Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah (LLCK, JBM, JFC, JLA), Salt Lake City, Utah
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, LDS Hospital Cardiology, 8th Avenue and C Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84143
  • ,
  • for the Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study Group

Received 27 October 2003; accepted 7 June 2004.

Purpose

To determine whether sex and age affect serum C-reactive protein level and its prognostic value in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods

In a consecutive series of 2254 patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease, baseline C-reactive protein and predictive value for incident death or nonfatal myocardial infarction by sex and age (<55 and ≥55 years) were compared. C-reactive protein levels were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay with use of a medium-sensitivity method. Patients were followed for a mean (±SD) of 3.1 ± 2.2 years. Comparisons used ln-transformed C-reactive protein and linear and time-to-event regression analyses, adjusting for confounders.

Results

Overall, women had higher geometric mean C-reactive protein levels than did men (1.47 vs. 1.30 mg/dL, P <0.001), even after adjustment for age, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, body mass index, and heart failure (P = 0.002). High C-reactive protein levels were associated with increased mortality or myocardial infarction among men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 2.3) but not among women (HR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.4). Among patients aged <55 years, C-reactive protein level was similarly predictive in men and women (HR = 2.2 vs. 2.7), whereas in patients ≥55 years of age, it remained predictive for men (HR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.5 to 2.3) but not women (HR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.4).

Conclusion

We found that the prognostic value of C-reactive protein in coronary artery disease patients varied by sex and age. This sex-age interaction may have important implications for C-reactive protein–based secondary risk assessment and requires further investigation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded in part by a grant from the Deseret Foundation, Salt Lake City, Utah.

PII: S0002-9343(04)00438-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.021

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 117, Issue 9 , Pages 657-664, 1 November 2004