The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 116, Issue 6, Supplement 1 , Pages 3-8, 22 March 2004

Past, present, and future standards for management of dyslipidemia

  • John C LaRosa, MD

      Affiliations

    • State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA, and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to John C. LaRosa, MD, State University of New York, Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Box 1, Brooklyn, New York 11203, USA.
  • ,
  • Antonio M Gotto Jr, MD, DPhil

      Affiliations

    • State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA, and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA

Abstract 

Evolution of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) guidelines for lipid lowering reflects a movement toward global risk assessment, including improved identification of risk in individuals without established coronary heart disease (CHD), and toward more aggressive lipid-lowering targets to reduce CHD risk. The current guidelines, for example, identify a segment of the population without established CHD as being at high risk on the basis of criteria that indicate CHD risk equivalency, recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma level <100 mg/dL as optimal in all individuals, and establish the metabolic syndrome as a secondary target for therapeutic intervention. Many questions remain for future guidelines to address: To what extent should plasma levels of LDL-C be lowered by therapy to afford optimal risk reduction? Can risk assessment be improved, e.g., by using novel risk measures (such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) to indicate patients at higher risk who may benefit from more aggressive interventions? Should the metabolic syndrome be considered a high-risk state warranting aggressive intervention irrespective of risk categorization using current scoring methods? Guidelines for lipid management represent a synthesis of constantly emerging and evolving data: ongoing efforts to improve understanding of the relation between dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, to increase knowledge of and ability to measure other CHD risk factors, and to improve therapeutic practices and options will be reflected in future guidelines.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9343(04)00071-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.005

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 116, Issue 6, Supplement 1 , Pages 3-8, 22 March 2004