The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 109, Issue 2 , Pages 95-101, 1 August 2000

Clinical clues to the causes of large pericardial effusions

  • Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda, MD

      Affiliations

    • Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda, MD, Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Passeig Vall d’Hebrón 119–129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Jordi Mercé, MD

      Affiliations

    • Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda, MD

      Affiliations

    • Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Jordi Soler-Soler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain

Received 23 August 1999; received in revised form 25 April 2000; accepted 25 April 2000. published online 16 August 2004.

Abstract 

PURPOSE: To examine whether the size of the effusion, the presence of tamponade, and inflammatory signs are useful in determining the causes of moderate or severe pericardial effusions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All echocardiograms performed at a general hospital between January 1990 and April 1996 were screened for pericardial effusion. Patients with moderate (echo-free space of 10 to 20 mm during diastole) or severe (echo-free space >20 mm) effusions were studied.

RESULTS: We identified 322 patients (166 [52%] men, mean [± SD] age 56 ± 17 years [range 15 to 88 years]), 132 (41%) with moderate and 190 (59%) with severe pericardial effusion. The most frequent etiologic diagnoses were acute idiopathic pericarditis (n = 66 [20%]), iatrogenic effusions (n = 50 [16%]), cancer (n = 43 [13%]), and chronic idiopathic pericardial effusion (n = 29 [9%]). In 192 (60%) of the patients, the cause of the effusion was a known medical condition. In the 130 other patients, inflammatory signs were associated with acute idiopathic pericarditis (likelihood ratio = 5.4, P < 0.001), severe effusions without inflammatory signs or tamponade were associated with chronic idiopathic pericardial effusion (likelihood ratio = 20, P < 0.001), and tamponade without inflammatory signs was associated with malignant effusions (likelihood ratio = 2.9, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: In many patients, pericardial effusions are due to a known underlying disease or condition. In patients without underlying diseases, inflammatory signs, the size of effusion, and the presence or absence of cardiac tamponade can be helpful in establishing cause.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9343(00)00459-9

The American Journal of Medicine
Volume 109, Issue 2 , Pages 95-101, 1 August 2000